Saudis In Bikinis Analysis

875 Words2 Pages

In Saudis In Bikinis, Nicholas D. Kristof describes a particular scene while he was in Riyadh. He observes three women in abayas shopping for provocative clothing. Bewildered by the scene, Kristof begins a series of interviews on Saudi women continuously asking them how they feel about being repressed. The Saudi women never claimed to be repressed, on the contrary, they believed western women have fallen under societies manipulation and have become the toys of men. Despite the rejection of the stereotype, Kristof persist on his mindset and judges Saudi women for their beliefs. Kristof insist on interviewing Saudi women in hopes for a different response. He believes they are in need of saving. Finally, he ends the article by saying Saudi women are incapable of progressing as a society because of their “repression”. Saudi Arabian women are not repressed, because it is simply a culture, and a choice; they are the only ones entitled to speak about their choices, but Westerners are blinded by their own opinion of them. …show more content…

Kristof viewed the scene as peculiar, how could Saudi women shop for such reveling clothing? When in reality, this was further proof that Saudi women are not repressed and have absolute freedom of what they wear, despite their abayas. A Saudi woman interviewed by Kristof, stated that she is at peace with her religion. She is pleased to cover herself up and abide by the rules. Many other Saudi women agree with her response. She further states how her abaya or religion do not stop her from participating in everyday activities. Saudi women can wear bikinis and wear provocative clothing, they can do anything a western woman can. They can do as they please, just not in front of men. Some might analyze this as a form of repression. However, Saudi women view it as a form of

Open Document