Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Saudi arabia laws based on
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Saudi arabia laws based on
In today’s world, there are many different aspects taken into account for a nation’s ability to govern and rule. There are various countries that have different beliefs and culture styles that ultimately decide the foundation of their nation. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), has proven to be a leading power in the Middle Eastern region of the world. Therefore, this has allowed them to become a true asset to the United States of America; by being an ally. The bond between the Saudi Arabian and United States of America; demonstrate their abilities to work together for a more unified Middle Eastern region. Throughout this essay the impact of Saudi Arabia’s government, military, and economy in the Middle Eastern region and the world will …show more content…
(MidEastWeb, 2003) A Monarchy is when a government or nation has “supreme power or sovereignty held by a single person.” (Dictionary.com, n.d.) However, since the formation of the Saudi Arabian government it has only been ruled by the Al Sa’ud family. (Britannica, 2017) Currently the King of Saudi Arabia is Salman bin Abdul-Aziz; who also serves as the Prime Minister of Saudi Arabia. (BBC News, 2015) The major difference in governing between the America and Saudi Arabia is visibly demonstrated through their governing polices implemented by the two nations. One key difference is the way Saudi Arabia treats women of their country and foreigners, compared to the United States of America. Saudi Arabia is governed under strict Islamic laws of the Wahhabi; which regulates the public’s behavior, and this is especially true for women and foreigners. (MidEastWeb, 2003) This mean that something as simple as driving a motor vehicle are not allowed for women along with countless other basic behaviors that an American would have. The ability to accept foreigners in the American society is seen as something that is welcomed and highly encouraged.
The place of women in Saudi society is determined by a deeply conservative culture, vindicated by a narrow interpretation of religion, and enforced by law. That place it would appear is at home, subservient to and legally dependant on their male guardian. Saudi society suffers from pervasive segregation along gender lines and women's freedom of movement is impeded, forcing them to rely on male chaperons.
Firstly, gender discrimination is not an exclusive feature of Saudi Arabia, but it is a more outwardly visible problem there. Gender discrimination and male superiority are most visible in Saudi Arabian culture because “inhabitants of the region where the Arabic language predominates are, despite their diversity, bound into a singular cultural unit with a particular gender system” (Tucker VII). If one group of Arabic individuals hold misogynistic views, or thinks that males are the superior gender, it is very likely that other Arabic individuals will as well. Individuals of the Arabic culture, regardless of their location share a particularly conservative and traditional set of moral beliefs the same way Christians from America may share similar beliefs with Christians from Europe. One belief most Saudi’s have in common is their “conservative view toward women” (Al-Mannai 82). Middle Eastern individuals know what behaviors to expect from each gender, and what each gender should and should not do. An effect of holding such a belief is that a man’s role in Saudi Arabia tends to be one of dominance and power; the male is the ruler ...
Although the United Sates and Saudi Arabia present the United States and Saudi Arabia’s relationship as excellent, there are actually two nations who have bitter disagreements but who allies through oil. The only thing that has held this alliance together is the US dependence on Saudi oil. The United States has felt and still fells that it is a necessity to have bases present in the Middle East to protect oil, and silently to protect Israel. The relationship began in 1933 when Standard Oil of California signed an agreement with the Saudi government. In 1943 FDR affirmed that the defense of Saudi Arabia was a vital interest to the United States and moved troops into the region. Future presidents would emulate this declaration and mobilization of troops to Saudi Arabia. Again in 1945 Abd al Aziz, the Saudi king, and FDR would cement this alliance, on a US warship in the Suez Canal. Soon after, airfields were constructed at Dhahran and other spots over Saudi Arabia; beginning a long tradition of US military facilities in Saudi Arabia. Abd al Aziz was the first of his line of successors to meet with US presidents. The relationship was only strengthened with the onset on the Cold war, as the US used the bases in Saudi Arabia as potential air force launch sites to the USSR and constructed more military facilities. In 1941 Harry S. Truman made another assertion of Americas protection and alliance with Saudi Arabia to Abd Al Aziz. Truman stated that “support for Saudi Arabia’s territorial integrity and political independence was a primary objective of the United States.” (Countrystudies.com) Another stipulation of this pact was that the US established a permanent military training mission in the Saudi Arabia. That mission lasted until 1992. Soon after the pact between Truman and Aziz was agreed upon the US-Saudi relationship would endure its first major disagreement. On May 14th, 1948 Israel was declared an independent state in the former Arab dominated Palestine. Israel’s independence was backed the United States. Saudi Arabia refused to acknowledge the country of Israel and to engage in any relations with them. The Saudis concerns of the Israel-US relationship were reinforced in the 1970’s and 1980’s when the US sold arms to Israel, but refused to sell arms to Saudi Arabia. In some cases congressional leaders refused to sell arms to Saudi Arabia on the grounds that Saudi Arabia might use them against Israel.
One of the biggest issues that seems to offend Iran greatly is American involvement in the Middle East. For many years, the United States has been helping regional allies to enhance their national security through {arms trade and military bases}. Iran, however, feels threatened by the American presence in the region. The Iranian goals of spreading Iranian-Islamic culture and increasing relations with neighboring countries are undoubtedly hindered by the United States’ close relationship with several countries in the region. Cohen, Edelman, and Takeyh argue that “the United States should help the Gulf state not only as they battle Iranian proxies in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen, but also as they deal with...protecting themselves against Iran’s efforts to undermine their internal security, defending their economic infrastructure, and preventing Iran from interdicting their energy exports along key transit routes.”
Maynes, Charles. "The Middle East in the Twenty-First Century." Middle East Journal 52.1 (1998): 9-16. JSTOR. Web. 6 June 2011.
It is bordered by Iraq and Jordan on the north, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and United Arab Emirates on the east, Oman and Yemen on the south. The Arabian Gulf Sea surrounded from the east and the Red Sea from the west. Saudi Arabia is a traditional monarchy. Al Saud dynasty is a royal family of the kingdom. The population of the kingdom was estimated to be 29,369,428 in 2014 - the 43rd largest in the world (Worldpopulationreview.com, 2014). In the technology side, Saudi Arabia is becoming focused on technology. They increase the spending on connectivity and human resources (Saudi Arabia Emergence of Innovation Kingdom,
Gerner, Deborah J., and Philip A. Schrodt. "Middle Eastern Politics." Understanding the contemporary Middle East. 3rd ed. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2008. 85 -136. Print.
...gely by religious values: Conservative dress, conservative literature, and conservative behavior. Freedom of political and religious expression is not allowed, and diversions like dancing, or movies, activities are almost nonexistence in Saudi Arabia. As it has been for centuries, the cultural and political life of Saudi Arabia continues to be expressed in terms of Islamic principles.
Both countries have nearly identical scores in the dimension of masculinity. This exhibits the driving cultural forces of competition and achievement, with success held in high regard over other values. With Uncertainty Avoidance, the country is once again polarized. With the USA's relatively low score, the culture exhibits acceptance for new ideas with an emphasis on innovation and toleration. On the opposite end of the spectrum, Saudi Arabia maintains rigidity in belief systems and acceptable behaviors and ideas, valuing security over uncertainty.
?US Challenges and Choices Saudi Arabia: A View from the Inside,? The Atlantic Council of the United States, The Middle East Institute, The Middle East Policy Council, and The Stanley Foundation, <http://reports.stanleyfdn.org/EFCgulfh02.pdf> (May 31, 2004).
...Arabia is a petrostate. Oil dominates the national economy, international exports, and the nation’s politics. It has greatly shaped what the kingdom is today. Having started out as somewhat of a tourist economy, the kingdom has become a world, monetary power. From their massive amounts of oil and extremely cheap production, the country has been able to gain large amounts of affluence and political power. With its large abundance of oil, the country has been able to profit immensely on sales and spur diplomatic outcomes to their benefit due to the great need of the resource. Without the discovery oil, Saudi Arabia would be of little importance in the modern world, having the Grand Mosque be the extent of its importance. But because of its discovery of oil, Saudi Arabia became of international importance, coming to be one of the greatest assets to world superpowers.
In an article published in the Wall Street Journal, Hirsi Ali begins by asking the reader a supposedly innocent question: “Will Saudi Arabia Free Its Women?” Implicit in the framing of the question is the notion that freedom is something granted not something fought for. For Hirsi Ali, the advent of freedom for Muslim women, whatever that might mean, would not be a transaction but instead a gift from those in power. Subtly undermining the agency of Muslim women, she continues by bluntly stating that “Saudi women do not have freedom of movement” pointing to the existing guardianship laws on the peninsula. (These laws prohibit adult women from Saudi Arabia from traveling, marrying, working, or accessing healthcare without obtaining permission from a male guardian.)
India and Saudi Arabia to maintain cordial and friendly relations, the old economic and socio- cultural relations reflect. Establishment of diplomatic relations in 1947 followed high-level visits from both sides. King Saud visited India in 1955 and Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru visited in 1956 the United Kingdom. Further strengthened visit of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in Saudi Arabia in 1982, the bilateral relations. Recently, the historic visit of King Abdullah to India in 2006 led to the signing of the "Declaration Delhi” new impetus to bilateral relations. Visit served as the basis for cooperation in all fields of mutual interest. Return visit of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to Saudi Arabia in 2010 raised the level of bilateral cooperation "strategic partnership” and “Riyadh declaration " signed during the visit of breathtaking realms.refers in political, economic, defense and security, bilateral relations between the Republic of India and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia cooperation strengthened. Relations between the two countries, as a rule, strong and close.
Constitutional monarchy can be described as a form of government in which a monarch acts as the head of state but functions within the parameters or guidelines of a written and/or unwritten constitution. Although the government may function officially in the monarch’s name, the monarch does not set public policies or choose the political leaders. Constitutional monarchy therefore differs from absolute monarchy where the monarch controls political decision making without being restricted by constitutional constraints. Consequently, a constitutional monarch has often been defined as a sovereign who reigns but does not rule. Constitutional monarchies have also been called limited monarchies, crowned republics or parliamentary monarchies.
In summary, Saudi Arabia is a conservative country and the debate about should women drive has shown us that people are at the edge of changing. Women have every right to drive and the government should take some serious steps to make that happen. It should allow them to drive while satisfying both sides because each side has valid points, and the only way this is going to work is new laws that assure women can safely drive.