Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of rorschach test
Rorschach test history and impact on psychology
Rorschach test validity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages and disadvantages of rorschach test
Critical thinking journal assignment The Rorschach is an empirically supported projective assessment tool, which can aid in the clinical decision making process. The Rorschach has been a projective measure that has been found to have validity in relation to psychological constructs such as: depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia (Gacono, Evans & Viglione, 2002). The Rorschach has been found to aid in the formulation of personality information by generating data relating to a person’s emotional management, thinking arrangements, interpersonal functioning, and how they see themselves (Del Giudice, 2008). The Rorschach has various critics as well as those who endorse the assessment tool for its valid findings. It is imperative for researchers …show more content…
One weakness associated with the Rorschach is the association of cost and training of those who administer the test (Del Giudice, 2008). The Rorschach has been considered a very controversial measure and many psychologists consider the use of it risky (Del Giudice, 2008). It is also criticized by its lacking face validity; the measure is an inkblot test that does not show those who take the assessment what the assessor is actually looking for (Del Giudice, 2008). Thus, use of the Rorschach could be considered worrisome. Some authors consider some of the areas the Rorschach attempts to measure as problematic in terms of reliability (Wood, Lilienfeld, Nezworski, & Garb, 2001). In comparison to the reliability of a well-known cognitive test (the WAIS) the reliability for the Rorschach is markedly lower (Wood, Lilienfeld, Nezworski, & Garb, 2001). Though, there were findings related to the Rorschach and its findings related to personality functioning, there has been more recent research showing that the previous findings are not able to be replicated (Wood, Lilienfeld, Nezworski, & Garb, 2001). Other findings provide that the Rorschach may not be as related to anxiety and depression as it claims to be (Wood, Lilienfeld, Nezworski, & Garb, 2001). Another finding suggests that the Rorschach simply equates its findings to underlying constructs that may not necessarily be related …show more content…
While there are various tests that may correlate with personality functioning, the Rorschach addresses personality functioning, and also allows the clinician to observe the client’s behavior, feelings, and thoughts while they engage in the assessment process (Gacono, Evans & Viglione, 2002). The Rorschach is a beneficial tool in various settings such as: the work place, military settings, judicial settings, and clinical settings. The Rorschach is an assessment tool that allows for specificity in the data that are gathered related to personality patterns and reduces impression management. Though the Rorschach has its weaknesses, it appears to have strengths that allow it to continue as a beneficial measure for psychological
The final test that I administer is called the Faux-Rorschach test. This test is constructed of three inkblot pictures and it intends to analyze a person’s emotional functioning. As I handed Steven each inkblot picture I asked him, “What may this be? His response for the first inkblot picture was, “This is two aliens doing the Nae Nae and they are both having babies at the same time while doing the Nae Nae.” I added, “What is the Nae Nae?” and he responded, “The NaeNae is a dance.” I then asked him to show me where he saw that. This was a really interesting response because it seem like Steven incorporated movement that doesn’t really exist. This is a sign of creativity because I was able to see his perspective after he pointed the picture out to me.When I handed him the next inkblot his response was, “This is an alien jumping towards me because he wants to attack me. I then asked him if he could show me where he saw that. He pointed at the picture and said, “These are his legs and his pulling his feet up because he is jumping towards me and the arms are out because he wants to grab me and take me down. And these are his foot prints from when he jumped.” I noticed Steven seemed to have a theme and that was unrealistic creatures. This makes me believe that he may be misunderstood and feels attacked by others. His final response to the last inkblot picture was, Steve: “These are two devils that are
This essay will explore one of the possible combinations of theories on personality and explain how it can be applied in practical therapy.
Butcher, James N. "Assessment in Clinical Psychology: A Perspective on the Past, Present Challenges, and Future Prospects." Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 13(3)(2006): 205-209.
The Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire is a tool often used by professionals to assess a patient’s personality subtypes on a rating scale of 20 to 80. Under the higher order temperament factor Positive Emotionality (PEM) there are four trait scales. For the trait scale Well Being, John Wayne Gacy would score a 70. He was an upstanding member of his community, liked by his neighbors and coworkers, and would even attend children’s birthday parties and hospitals dressed as Pogo the Clown (Hickey, 2016). He had a cheerful disposition when facing the public, however, he only receives a 70 because he would, in fact, be subject to violent mood swings. For the trait scale Social Potency, Gacy receives a score of 80. He
Schwartz, G. E. (1982). Testing the biopsychosocial model: The ultimate challenge facing behavioral medicine? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(6), 1040
P.J. (2004). Personality: Theory and Research. USA: Wiley. SMITH. T. W. and WILLIAMS.
Cervone, D., Pervin, L. A. (2008). Personality: Theory and research (10th Ed.). New York: Wiley.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Journal of personality and social psychology and. Retrieved from http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~broberts/Hazan & Shaver, 1987.pdf
People have studied personalities for thousands of years. Personality assessments have existed for the past 100 years. There are several different tests available to help you understand yourself and others better. Once this is achieved, the idea is to foster better communication based upon the knowledge of the traits of your team.
Mcbride, Carolina. Zuroff, David. Ravitz, Paula. Koestner, Richard. Moskowitz, Debbie. Quilty, Lena. Bagby, Michael. (2010). British Journal of Clinical Psychology. , 49(4), p529-545.
Orne, M. T., & Holland, C. H. (1968). On the ecological validity of laboratory deceptions. International Journal of Psychiatry, 6: 282-293.
The clinical and statistical approaches have both proven to be successful methods in clinical psychology. Each approach has its pros and cons depending on the type of situation that is being dealt with. Clinical judgment can be a complex process because it requires a patient’s data which are composed of samples, observations, signs of underlying states and the clinician’s responses. According to Sundberg, Tyler and Taplin (1973) clinical interpretation may consist of 3 different levels: Level 1 deals with clinicians being familiar with certain experiences, and therefore, making a prediction based off of that. An example of this would be the SAT or GRE assessments. Level 2 is comprised of clinicians carefully observing a patient’s behaviors and coming up with a conclusion based off of the behavior characteristics that the patient displays. In level 3, based off of the individual’s determinants in a specific situation, the clinician seeks a consistent understanding. For example, blood responses on the Rorschach test can be a determinant of hidden aggression, which would then lead to future impulsive outbursts or losing control of oneself (Sundverg, Tyler and Taplin 1973). Although both the clinical and statistical approaches have proven to be beneficial, I believe that clinical psychologists should not rely more on statistical predictions and prepackaged treatments than clinical judgment and individual patients.
Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research (5th ed). Boston , MA, USA: Pearson
Personality tests and skills assessments provide valuable information for certain well-defined positions, such as seller, buyer and worker in routine production. The interviews to study the person, carried out by experts are also useful when simpler methods do not clearly show certain characteristics such as emotional stability. Psychological tests on knowledge have limited success. The diversity of requirements for them, coupled with the complexity of motivations and behavior of individuals, make the structuring of proof extremely difficult. Psychological tests and interviews implemented for personality assessment act as a supplement to other administrative criteria. When it comes to executive positions, the main value of the evidence lies in corroboration or uncertainty about personal qualifications. The qualifications of persons based on experience are an important administrative requirement (Archer & Smith,