Roary Leadership Style

• Leadership is very important ability that demonstrate when influencing others to act in a particular way. Through direction, encouragement, sensitivity, consideration, and support that people inspire your followers to accept challenges and achieve goals that may be viewed as difficult to achieve. As a leader, helping their followers to develop a sense of personal and professional accomplishment is a must because being a leader, building a commitment to goal attainment among those being led, as well as a strong desire for them to continue to follow.

The words leader and supervisor are frequently used to mean the same thing, but they do not. To those who supervise others are appointed by the organization. They have legitimate power that allows

them to reward and push their employees. Their ability to influence employees is based on the formal authority inherent in their positions. In contrast, leaders may either be appointed or emerge from within group. Leaders can influence others to perform beyond the actions dictated by formal authority.
There are never a one size fits to all leadership style for every business and companies operate differently and certain traits will be more successful in some environment than others. However, having a thorough understanding of various leadership styles enables senior executives to not only adopt the correct characteristic for themselves, but also choose better managers throughout the company or organization.
On the other hand, within this exercise I learned different types of leadership styles.

Each one defines different types of leadership that exist in work environments. From the laissez-faire to the supreme autocrat, leaders and organizations have a variety of leadership styles, but not every style is right for everyone. I also found my capabilities and leadership style in were I feel I am suitable and I am a laissez-faire leader because I am laid back and allowing my employees to get on with their tasks as they see fits and also in how direct supervisor and somehow fails to provide regular feedback to those under

me.
Overall, the culture and goals of an organization determine which leadership style fits the firm best while personality differences often command which is most often uses. Companies offer several leadership styles and within the organization the dependent upon the necessary tasks to complete the department needs.

• I highly suggest for Roary to be resourceful and use the web to find his own leadership style and how to overcome his own leadership style’s disadvantage, so that he could be successful for his own management level position.

• https://online.stu.edu/autocratic-leadership/
o It is from an online out of state university that helps leadership and explaining how autocratic leadership works in aspect of business.
• https://www.findcourses.co.uk/inspiration/articles/authoritarian-leadership-style-10084
o An online course from United Kingdom that helps authoritarian leadership: cases for and against. It is divided into the definition, benefits and the drawbacks of authoritarian leadership.
• https://yourbusiness.azcentral.com/authoritative-leadership-styles-16647.html
o Random website that characterize authoritative leadership.

• Roary’s leadership style is an autocratic leader which best described as a taskmaster.

This individual leaves no doubt as to who’s on charger and who has the authority and power in the group. They make all decisions affecting the group and tell others what to do. This telling frequently happens in the form of orders – mandates that are expected to be followed. Failure to obey these orders usually results in some negative reinforcement at the hands of the authoritarian leader. Although counter to contemporary leadership philosophy, there are leaders in all types of organizations – business, government, and the military – for whom the autocratic style works

best.
o Apparently, this style is appropriate for business, government and military because of how strict and fast pace the decision making. Also the disadvantages of this style were:
♣ Communicating without feedback leads to misunderstanding and communications breakdown.
♣ Making own decisions which can be very dangerous in this age of technological and sociological complexity.
♣ Developing worker’s commitment to the objectives for the work place.
♣ Creating problems both with employee morale and production in the long-run because of their anger.