Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conservationism during progressive era
Environmental Movements in the US
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conservationism during progressive era
American conservationism and environmentalism spurred new societal and governmental attitudes towards land and natural resources while reflecting the values of the early and mid-20th century, respectively. With the conclusion of the Progressive era and the beginning of American counter-culture movement in the 1960s, the United States’ approach to the environment shifted from conservation and management to enforced regulation and protection showing the impact of a changing American awareness of the environment.
Although environmentalism and conservationism both promoted responsible human management of nature, the movements vary in their core ideologies. Specifically, conservation has its roots in the economic value of nature whereas environmentalism seeks to protect the environment from humans. Conservation arose in the early 20th century amidst the Progressive Era and the Second Industrial Revolution and although it encouraged the sustainable use of resources, many of its efforts and practices were actually implemented for human benefit. Conservationists called for the control of certain wildlife for recreational and economic uses such as hunting and food and were not concerned with the ecological consequences of their efforts. Gaining popularity in the 1960s, environmentalism pushed for ecological sensibility and protection of the environment rather than its exploitation for economic advantage. Environmentalism sought the governmental regulation of wildlife in the late 1960s and 1970s to limit human manipulation of nature. Environmentalism also led to the growth of environmental protection groups which advocated for a symbiotic relationship between humans and the environment. Even though environmentalism and conservationism bot...
... middle of paper ...
...ntal movements. In particular, the political pressure to minimize governmental regulation, the budget constraints affecting all areas of governmental spending and doubts about the existence of climate change will require innovative strategies to continue the protection of the environment.
Works Cited
Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962.
Hardin, Garrett. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162, no. 3859 (Dec. 13, 1968): 1243-48.
Hayes, Denis. “The Beginning.” In Earth Day—the Beginning: A Guide for Survival, edited by Environment Action, 480-83. New York: Bantam Books, 1970.
Merchant, Carolyn. American Environmental History: an Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.
Worster, Donald. “The Value of a Varmint.” In Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas, 258-90. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
In Mark Fiege’s book “The Republic of Nature,” the author embarks on an elaborate, yet eloquent quest to chronicle pivotal points in American history from an environmental perspective. This scholarly work composed by Fiege details the environmental perspective of American history by focusing on nine key moments showing how nature is very much entrenched in the fibers that manifested this great nation. The author sheds light on the forces that shape the lands of America and humanities desire to master and manipulate nature, while the human individual experience is dictated by the cycles that govern nature. The story of the human experience unfolds in Mark Fiege’s book through history’s actors and their challenges amongst an array of environmental possibilities, which led to nature being the deciding factor on how
The rise of conservation was first fueled by Theodore Roosevelt in the late 19th century. And the issues surrounding conservation had risen in the US around that time. The new understanding affects the country and its policies. Conservation is the careful preservation and protection of something; especially planned management of a natural resource to prevent exploitation, destruction, or neglect. Merriam-Webster:
He delves into the history of the word “environmental” as well as the history of environmental activism. He pinpoints the beginning of the movement to Rachel Carson. According to Quammen, she began the revolution by publishing her book Silent Spring. He says the negative connotations of the word began with her book, pairing “environment” and “the survival of humankind” as if they go hand in hand. This played a major role in the distortion of the word and the intentions of environmentalists.
Theodore Roosevelt: The Great Environmentalist This Paper will outline President Theodore Roosevelt’s role in helping to conserve our environment during his administration (1901-1909). It will also examine his theory of a stronger American democracy through environmental conservationism. “The movement for the conservation of wildlife, and the larger movement for the conservation of all our natural resources, are essentially democratic in spirit, purpose, and method.” (Roosevelt 274)
The battle between humanity and nature began when the industrial civilization started threatening our environment and natural resources. Hunters, like Theodore Roosevelt and Aldo Leopold, were the first Americans to realize that nature is something that we need to preserve. Leopold’s awakening was seeing a fierce green fire in the eyes of a wolf he had shot. He was able to understand what it means to take away pieces of life and how it affected the important role of earth’s grand scheme of nature. People started to become environmentalists when they experienced the same realization as
The Conservation movement was a driving force at the beginning of the twentieth century. It was a time during which Americans were coming to terms with their wasteful ways, and learning to conserve what they quickly realized to be limited resources. In the article from the Ladies’ Home Journal, the author points out that in times past, Americans took advantage of what they thought of as inexhaustible resources. For example, "if they wanted lumber for their houses, rails for their fences, fuel for their stoves, they would cut down half a forest at a time; and whatever they could not use or sell they would leave to rot on the ground. They never bothered their heads to inquire where more wood was coming from when this was gone" (33). The twentieth century opened with a vision towards the future, towards preserving the land that had previously been taken for granted. The Conservation movement came along around the same time as one of the first major waves of the feminist movement. With the two struggles going on: one for the freedom of nature and the other for the freedom of women, it stands to follow that they coincided. As homemakers, activists, and citizens of the United States of America, women have had an important role in Conservation.
John Muir helped the development of the American conservation movement during the late nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century. The creation of the National Park Service, the creation of several major national parks, including Yosemite National Park and the creation of the Sierra Club were all because of John Muir. In the late nineteenth century America was in a stage of expansion and economic development that used as well as threatened much of the natural world. Much of the economic development was in the form of industrialization that took its toll of the environment with both its consumption of natural resources as well pollution. This expansion and economic development had adverse consequences on the environment of the United States. During this time of development many became aware of the damage being done to the natural world and attempted to prevent or limit this damage being done. It is during this time of both industrialization and spiritual awakening that the conservation movement arose with one of its most famous activists, John Muir.
In 1989, seventy five percent of Americans identified themselves as environmentalists, and the number has continued to grow since then (Walls 1). Environmentalism is now the most popular social movement in the United States, with over five million American families donating regularly to environmental organizations (Walls 1). Environmentalists today focus on what kind of world they hope to see in the future, and largely deal with limiting pollution and changing consumption rates (Kent 1 and 9). Modern environmentalists also have much different issues than those Carson’s America faced. With climate change becoming more threatening each year, protection of the natural world is needed more than ever. Pollution has caused the warmest decade in history, the deterioration of the ozone layer, and species extinction in extreme numbers (Hunter 2). It not only threatens nature, but also human populations, who already suffer from lack of clean water and poisoning from toxic chemicals (Hunter 16). Unlike environmental actions in the 1960’s, which were mostly focused on protection, a massive increase in pollution has caused efforts to be focused on environmental restoration (Hunter 16). Like in the time of Silent Spring, environmentalists are not only concerned with one country. Protecting the environment remains a global issue, and every nation is threatened by the
Since the rise of the American environmental romanticism the idea of preservation and conservation have been seen as competing ideologies. Literary scholars such as Thoreau and Muir have all spoke to the defense of our natural lands in a pristine, untouched form. These pro-preservation thinkers believed in the protecting of American lands to not only ensure that future generations will get to experiences these lands, but to protect the heavily rooted early American nationalism in our natural expanses. Muir was one of the most outspoken supports of the preservation ideology, yet his stylistic writing style and rhetoric resulted in conservation being an adopted practice in the early 20th century
Radical Environmentalism is now a common term in our vocabulary. When you here the term what do you think about? I think about all the things that the environmentalists talk about and all the ideas brought to the table, good and bad. In the two articles I read they are both on the same subject of Environmental issues. The first author Jack Alan Brown Jr. is not against the environmentalism but feels that we have to do something to farther the advance of human kind. The second author F.R. Duplantier topic is “Do environmentalists really love nature, or do they just hate people”(p.1)? A combination of the author’s opinions would give you my thesis. For the advance of the human culture to take place, nature is going to have to help by giving the humans the resources available in nature.
This revolution also further drove the concept of our worldview on the planet to be understood as a gift for our exploitation, a Godsend that engrained this mantra of gaining life through money, rather than through the source itself. Preservationists hope to explain how this is not the way we are meant to look at our ecology. This idea does not have to be about living a minimalist lifestyle in the same manner as Thoreau, but it does demand that we take responsibility for the havoc we are wreaking on the source of life itself. Saving the earth from experiencing catastrophic destruction can be possible, but only if our world can adopt a worldview that incorporates preservationism. The closer we become to our materialistic possessions results in an inverse relationship with ourselves and reality. Areas like Yosemite, Yellowstone, the Serengeti and the Sierras have become iconic to mankind. Years ago when these land masses were coming about to be preserved as sacred national parks, it was indeed a battle that very few were willing to fight for. These awe-inspiring land masses provide an aesthetic appeasement that no multitude of materialistic items could ever come close to producing. However, due to how strong of
Ashlee Doyon Second Response Paper (Redo) Environmental Identity What is environmental identity? "Environmental identity, is how one views oneself in relation to the natural world. Environmental identity is part of the way in which one forms his/her self-concept and a sense of connection to some part of the nonhuman natural environment, based on personal history, emotional attachment, and/or similarity.
...is some way so that the movement can continue despite social changes. The Environmental Movement is an impeccable representation of what all social movements should be. They have been able to maintain their position throughout 150 years and in those years America has developed extraordinary and they have managed to modify to fit modern times. Their support system varies not only in racial background, but as well in class and economic background. The campaign’s success can be measured in the steps the take to accommodate society and in their ability to promote a tremendous amount of groups. Future social movements should take notes on what the Environmental Movement has managed to accomplish that others haven’t if they want to ensure their success.
* Daily, Gretchen C., ed. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1997.
“Environmentalism is a new and complex phenomenon. It is complex as it incorporates a strongly negative element of anti-development, anti-progress, anti-technology, anti-business, anti-established institutions, and, above all, anti-capitalism.” Environmentalism “as a movement is activist, adversarial, punitive, and coercive.” It “has repeatedly used the alleged threat of global eco-catastrophe to override the wishes of people who most desperately need