Rhetorical Analysis
Sabrina Ricksecker
Grand Canyon University: Eng-105
September 17, 2015
Introduction
Every person on earth is destined for self-definition. When it comes to tattoos, most of society has formed preconceived notions; that people with tattoos are seeking to identify themselves. This topic is important because it should be considered a crime to label these people as a whole the way Andres Martin does. Andres Martin is a well-known child psychiatrist who specializes in diagnosing, and treating mental illnesses such as anxiety disorders, depression, substance abuse and schizophrenia. In On Teenagers and Tattoos, he is trying to express to other psychologists that it could be easier getting to know a teenaged
…show more content…
patient who has a tattoo. Summary In “On Teenagers and Tattoos,” Andres Martin expresses his views on why adolescents are prone to getting tattoos at such a young age.
In the beginning of the article, Martin explains that teenagers usually pursue tattoos from an influence or even in an effort to confirm affiliation or identity (Martin, 1). He then compares the standpoints of the adolescents and parents. Adolescents tend to get tattoos or piercings for the look and feel of it, while parents feel that their child receiving a piercing or tattoo as a threat to their authority. Martin expresses how even the simplicity of piercing or tattooing skin can cause strain and arguments in families (Martin, 2). He then introduces his three main sections: Identity and the Adolescent’s Body, Incorporation and Ownership, and The Quest for Permanence. In his first section, Identity and the Adolescent’s Body, Martin explains some reasons as to why adolescents seek receiving something involving such permanence. He conveys how most teenagers seek piercing and tattooing as a refuge from an identity crisis or conflict, which are normal for youth development (Martin, 3). In Martin’s second section, Incorporation and Ownership, he explains how some adolescents receive tattoos after long thought processes; they embrace fantasy and imagination (Martin, 4). Last but not least, The Quest for Permanence. Martin explains how an anchor tattoo could mean something different for everyone. It is impossible to perceive a tattoo and know …show more content…
exactly what it means to the person. Tattoo motifs are different for everyone. Furthermore, involving the title, he moves on to how the tattoo will stay permanent but things around you may change (Martin, 5). Audience Analysis When it comes to psychology, psychologists expect professionalism, open minds, and substantial beliefs. In Andres Martin’s “On Teenagers and Tattoos,” he writes “Tattoos and piercing can offer a concrete and readily available solution for many of the identity crises and conflicts normative to adolescent development. In using such decorations, and by marking out their bodily territories, adolescents can support their efforts at autonomy, privacy, and insulation. Seeking individuation, tattooed adolescents can become unambiguously demarcated from others and singled out as unique.” In this quote and most of the article as it is, Martin is too narrow-minded and only focuses on youth instead of realizing tattoos are a “world effort;” in which every age, race, and gender have participated. The tone and form of the paper is very well written, and provides a great outlook on tattoos involving youth. Martin’s article was very well written; it was a basic formal article. While reading the article, it was hard to be sure whom it, was directed towards. Parents? Youth? Psychologists? It was easy to assume it was mostly for parents to read, but it was a strong annoyance to not know for sure. Overall, Martin did a great job incorporating real stories into his article but his objective strayed so it created some miscommunications. Persuasive Analysis Metaphors, analogies, and comparisons help provide different scenarios to help readers develop a beginning stance or viewpoint. They can help readers to gain a good impression, a bad impression, or an undecided impression. In this comparison, the first example compares tattoos as attention grabbers. The second example portrays people who get tattoos as people who are having trouble expressing themselves; so they portray their emotions through their tattoos. While considering these examples, most child psychiatrists would think the comparisons were too limited and possibly could have been broadened just a bit. Martin does not provide enough information through the comparison which would help a reader to decide their standpoint; so a limited extent. Andres Martin mentions the word quest only once, but in such a way that makes you think. “The quest for permanence may at other times prove misleading and offer premature closure to unresolved conflicts (Martin, 10).” In context, the word quest is used to imply an emotional journey rather than an actual expedition. Connotations refer to a separate meaning implied by different words. When Martin is using the phrase, he is implying that teenagers who get tattoos are on an emotional journey trying to find something physically and emotionally permanent. From a teenager’s point of view, it’s as if Martin is assuming that teenagers seeking tattoos are on a quest trying to fill an emotional void, when in actuality that is not always true. The entire phrase containing the word quest implies the wrong impression to teenaged readers. The word quest in context also implies that only emotionally damaged people get tattoos. In On Teenagers and Tattoos, Andres Martin provides three sources for qualitative evidence; real people.
His first source of qualitative evidence is a quote from the book Moby Dick, the quote is basically saying “Why not tell my story on my body?” His second source is a case vignette of a 13-year-old boy with a tattoo; he received the tattoo in remembrance of his father passing away. Each aspect of the tattoo is significant in some way. The last case vignette is of a 17-year-old father with a tattoo of his four month old baby girl’s face on his chest. “For many North Americans, tattoos reflect hopes, values, or beliefs and act as vehicles to communicate those beliefs to others (Sanders, 1989).” Regarding Martin’s evidence, his readers will form their own opinions, and eventually decide their own standpoint. “For some young people today, as has been true throughout history, body art is a beautifying, positive experience.” When Martin uses qualitative evidence, the word quality comes to mind. Since his message to fellow psychiatrists is that tattoos can be beneficial when getting to know teenaged patients, his use of qualitative evidence really does form quality in his article and definitely helps his audience to develop a standpoint. In no way does his qualitative evidence undermine his
purpose. Direct Response The audience is fellow psychiatrists and Martin is relaying the message that tattooed teenaged patients would be easier to treat, understand and relate to. While reading Andres Martin’s article on adolescents with tattoos, one can only assume his objective has strayed off the deep end. Throughout the entire article, Martin is undermining his objective by describing or labeling all teenagers as damaged or seeking self-identity. The only time Martin ever supports his objective is with his case vignettes and quotes. Tattoos are a very hard topic to label and Martin labels them disappointingly. He never once explains how not all teenagers with tattoos are seeking self-identity, unless his case vignettes and quotes are taken into account. Conclusion Not every teenager is seeking self-identity. What if they have a tattoo because they want to show the world they know who they are? Yes, some teenagers receive tattoos as a cry for permanence, but it is impossible to label all tattooed teenagers, and that is why I do not support Andres Martin’s approach. The reason we are here on earth is to discover who we are, and who God wants us to be. Receiving a tattoo could be considered a way to emphasize and further pursue self-identity, and that is not a bad thing. Reference Martin, A. (2000). On Teenagers and Tattoos. Reclaiming Children and Youth. Retrieved from https://lc-trad1.gcu.edu/ McGuinness, T. M. (2006). Teens & Body Art. Journal Of Psychosocial Nursing & Mental Health Services, 44(4), 13. Sanders, C. (1989). Customizing the body: Vie art and culture of tattooing. Philadelphia: Temple University.
Tattoo’s that are removable are not romantic, and it’s the wuss way to do it. I believe that the main idea of this article is how she got a tattoo that most people would regret because of how much she picked at it, but she didn’t regret it like most people would. In one of the paragraphs she says how even though her tattoo is blurry, scarred, and bad-looking, but she still has no regrets about it unlike 17% of the people in America who have tattoo’s.
“A Generation of Slackers? Not So Much” written by Catherine Rampell is an informative article about today’s millennial generation after high school. It provides the reader with a deeper look into young people’s work ethic, or what some to think to be, lack-there-of. The author does a fantastic job using research, credible resources, and statistics to support her belief that Generation Y (children born in the 1980s and 1990s) is no less productive than previous generations. I will admit that before reading this piece, I was one of those who believed that Millennials were in fact the “coddled, disrespectful and narcissistic generation” (Rampell, 2011, para 3). After reading this article, my opinion has changed. It has touched on issues
Kosut, M. (2006). An Ironic Fad: The Commodification And Consumption Of Tattoos. The Journal of Popular Culture, 39(6), 1035-1048. Retrieved November 29, 2013, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2006.00333.x
Society has changed in many ways over the years; at one point tattoos were considered unprofessional and disgusting to most people, but today, they are quite common amongst young adults and people who enjoy art. Parents and people of many older generations, sometimes struggle to understand why this new interest in tattoos has been able to consume American culture so quickly. Prior to this boom of interest in tattoos, there were many horror stories that surrounded the subject due to unsanitary tools used and possible diseases a person could catch if a mistake was made. Lois Desocio is one of those adults who has struggled to understand tattoos, especially since her son Alec began to fill his body with them. As Alec’s collection of body art continues
“This world is but a canvas to our imagination” (Thoreau). The world is quite literally a canvas for graffiti artists, and these two opinion editorials cover the desire for this medium of art to be appreciated and showcased. Eric Felisbret wrote “Legal Venues Celebrate Graffiti as an Art Form” which was published on July 16, 2014 in the New York Times. Felisbret’s article was about creating more legal venues to showcase graffiti. Kathy Grayson wrote “L.A. Graffiti Exhibition, ‘Art in the Streets,’ belongs in N.Y.C.,” which was published on June 26, 2011 in the New York Daily News. Grayson wrote her article to persuade readers that “Art in the Streets” belongs in New York. The articles were simultaneously the same and very different in their content. Even though the specific messages were diverse the purpose was to persuade the discourse community, who value law, education, and their community, into having graffiti displayed as art. These two
Body modifications, with the focus of tattoos, have existed in our society for centuries and the way in which it is perceived has changed somewhat over the years, yet certain dishonors still remain our modern day. Like most body modifications, tattoos are an often misunderstood form of body modification. Despite the stigmas, tattoos have become a unique object of desire to endless diverse groups of people. But are the popular assumptions of tattoos out of sync with the true meaning behind them? Further explanation and exploration of the history will reveal the social and cultural practices of tattooing and the causal connection between the mind and the tattooed body, in addition to providing answers as to why tattoos stimulate uneasiness and curiosity and create a challenge to discursive practices.
Many people have been getting tattoos lately. People of all ages have been getting them and from all different backgrounds. On a nice day in just about any public place one can spot a tattoo about every five minutes, from the business man who had a portrait of his daughter put on him to a young girl with a butterfly on her ankle and even people with extensive tattoo coverage. What is even more interesting is the rise in the number of people who are heavily tattooed and that they come from all different backgrounds. Not too long ago tattooing did not experience the popularity in mainstream culture that it does now. The question that must be asked in order to understand this fascination that popular culture has had with tattoos is why people get tattoos.
This photograph of the Execution of a Viet Cong prisoner in Saigon is a very powerful, political and emotionally affecting photograph taken by Eddie Adams. First of all, the photograph is in black and white, unusual from the conventional colour photograph that we are used to seeing in today’s modern world. As the photograph is in black and white, the eye doesn’t attract to the vibrant colours that would usually be seen, the focal point is the scared look on the Viet Cong prisoner’s face. It’s the shock and the power that is immediately brought to the attention of the viewer’s eye when they first look upon the photograph. The eye is then immediately attracted to the cause of the photograph, General Nguyen Ngoc Loan.
A controversial topic today is whether or not body piercings and tattoos should be accepted by professionals working in health care. Currently, tattoos and piercings are allowed in health care as long as they are not visible. According to one of the studies, “Body piercing is defined as a piercing of the body anywhere other than the earlobes” (Westerfield). Therefore, the only visible piercings allowed are small studs in the lobes of the ears for females. The reason body piercings and tattoos are not suggested in health care is that they keep someone from looking professional as well as making them look intimidating. Not everyone sees them that way. The opposing side is that they do not affect
Mark Twain, who needs no introduction, has inspired hundreds of thousands, even millions of American youth through his speech “Advice to Youth.” During his speech, Twain tells young people all of the common advice which they have undoubtedly heard time and time again but this time, with a satirical spin. This satirical spin of advice including “[g]o to bed early, get up early” and “[a]lways obey your parents[,]” reveals an underlying tone of the essay: conformity kills individuality. His entire essay is used as an attempt to drill this point into our youth and to persuade them to accept it in truth. Twain undoubtedly persuades his audience that we should conform with society when our leaders and authorities are around us
A persons’ image is vital when meeting someone for the first time. Our peers, employers, family, superiors, even strangers that you walk past can automatically judge someone, and imagine how they present themselves to the world. Tattoos have been predominantly linked with a rebellious attitude and pictured on out of control stereotypes such as rock starts, bikers, sailors, and disobedient teenagers who want nothing more than to hack off their parents. With a new coming of age generation and a step into a more lenient and liberal society these types of patrons still participate in body art but so do doctors, lawyers, or just the run of the mill house mom. Tattoos signify religious beliefs, cultural influence, or each individual’s sole style. Body art is no longer socially offensive, employers are more apt to hiring tatted hopeful applicants, parents are warming up to the idea of their children inking their body and no longer a stranger on the street with a tattoo is necessarily prejudged as a criminal or safety hazard. Tattoos have become more evolved over the years because they have become more of a socially accepted element of the general public.
Symbolism and meaning is by far one of the most important aspects of the tattoo industry. “The abstract emotions and human awareness of emotions show what really is going on in ones life (Johnson)”. For that reason tattooing is a form of self-expression, and can stand for literal interpretations. For the most part these interpretations are the conveying of spiritual meaning, or marking milestones such as life or death” (Johnson). For those who think tattooing is just for looks or put a bad judgment on it, should also realize that ones personal interest reflects upon their lives. “Many individuals get their first tattoos during adolescence or young adulthood.”(Bravermark) Due to the mainstream culture, these traditions traditionally associate with stereotypes. Stereotypes defiantly have a huge impact on life. Which leads to the next point? Whether flaunted or hidden, sought as art or brought out on a whim, the tattoo has left a huge impact on generation after generation.
Tattoos are a controversial subject in the world we live in. The kind of people that get tattoos is now varied to almost all humans regardless of race, religion, or age. What many people fail to understand or realize is how much of an effect a tattoo can have on the rest of your life. The original tattoo stereotypes have faded from what they were many years ago and yet tattoos still have a reputation as for what kind of people get tattoos. There are many reasons as to why people would get a tattoo but there are many reason why you should think before you ink. Our society and the social media today has a huge impact on the tattoo industry. Movie stars and pop singers with many tattoos are posing as role models for our generation and
Jones, Jonathan . "Tattooing: Eye Catching- but are they art?." Guardian 23 September 2011, n.
Are tattoos a kiss of death at a workplace? According to Student Research Center, nearly 4 out of every 10 Americans in their 30s have been inked. ''In April 2000 15% of Americans were tattooed (which is roughly around 40 million people) (The National Geographic).'There are different types of tattoos, from color to black and white, even glow in the dark. Number of tattoo paralos in the U.S. is 21,000'' (Tattoo Statistics 1) and more is being added every single day. People spend about $1.6 billion on tattoos once a year. ''In the U.S. more women than men are tattooed, 36% of the ages is between 18-25 and 40% of those ages are 26-40 that have at least one tattoo.''(Random facts 1) People have been getting tattoos for a while now. It has been said that ''tattoos date back as far as the Neolithic era or around the fourth to fifth millennium BC.''(skinsight.com 1) Tattoos should be acceptable at a place of business because people get tattoos for significant purposes, tattoos can tell stories and build confidence, body art is a way for someone to express themselves, make up, and tattoos are reminders of life time experiences.