Rhetorical Analysis Of Malala Yousafzai

423 Words1 Page

The Effectiveness of Rhetoric Malala Yousafzai has made many claims for what she believes in. Those without a voice need to be heard. The taliban cannot quiet her. Nonviolence is one of the World’s greatest traditions. Education is one of the most important human rights. Yousafzai is able to support these claims with the way she speaks. She is splendid at using rhetoric, persuasive language with techniques like figures of speech. Malala Yousafzai uses repetition, pathos, and ethos to support her claims. Repetition is used to emphasize her claim that the Taliban will not quiet her. For example, after Yousafzai is shot by the Taliban her “...ambitions are the same. [Her] hopes are the same. [Her] dreams are the same” (Six). The repeating of the phrase “are the same” makes the listener or reader take a moment and think what Yousafzai is saying. The repetition also brings a …show more content…

For example, Yousafzai speaks about girls and boys education because "... they are suffering the most" (Eleven). Using the word "suffering" draws emotion from the listeners or readers. This is using pathos because it is evoking emotion. In addition, Yousafzai shows that “... innocent and poor children are victims of child labor,” (Ten) instead of getting an education. Saying that the children are innocent and poor brings out emotion, evoking pathos. This adds to her claim by making education sound even more important. Pathos is used to evoke emotion from the audience about her claim. To support her claims, Malala Yousafzai uses pathos, ethos, and repetition. Pathos to support her claim on education and draw out emotion from the audience. Ethos to support her claim on nonviolence and give her credibility. Repetition to support her claim on the Taliban and to emphasize her points. Through using these rhetorics, Malala Yousafzai produces a wonderfully inspirational speech that is supported by

Open Document