Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetoric and truth
Rhetoric and truth
Functions and characteristics of rhetoric
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ace Atkins use of a critical tone and various pathos cause those who thought they were environmentally friendly to rethink their actions. Atkins critical tone gives his writing personality. He begins his essay by calling out Prius owners. He basically states that some Prius owners are not worthy enough to have Prius. His tone throughout the article is critical and snobby. Ace Atkins states “Contrary to the current fad, you don't become a better planetary citizen simply by investing in a more fuel-efficient car.” Basically he means that we believe that people who have more expansive possessions than us are not always above us. A Prius is looked at as a very expensive car for the upper class. On the road Prius owners are put on a pedestal. …show more content…
He is telling us that they are equal to us. Later on in the article his critical tone returns. Atkins begins to observe house sizes. He basically concludes that since the 1970s our house sizes have nearly doubled. He then begins to put himself back on the pedestal when he explains how his own house is only 1,800 square feet. Atkins use of his critical tone drew readers in. His writing is very abrupt. In the first paragraph his personality is clearly shown when he begins to describe his thoughts on the road. “Oh, great, you thinka red-stater. The son of a bitch probably never even saw An Inconvenient Truth and tunes in to Fox News between reruns of Walker, Texas Ranger.” Atkins says. His style of writing makes readers interested. His word choice is so strange it makes readers want to continue. Ace Atkins mixed several pathos into his writing.
He uses this rhetorical strategy to get inside readers heads. He quotes the words of what he refers to as a “Mississippi native Bo Diddley: “Before you accuse me, take a look at yourself." This quote is then followed by a short one sentence paragraph that asks the question “Does your life match your ride?” What Atkins is doing is trying to get inside his readers heads. He is drawn to the conclusion that we believe that we are better than others because of our possessions. We accuse others of problems that we never thought were actually our own fault. We jump to conclusions and always look past this idea. He then continues to place himself back on the pedestal by explaining how he owns a small truck, runs a dog-rescue group, and grows his own produce. Then he turns to us. “You drive an eco-friendly gas sipper. That's great.” He observes. He then continues to explain how our vehicles and other modes of transportation pollute the earth. He uses this same strategy several times throughout the article. His one arguments on others lifestyles are quickly followed by a sentence paragraph that can be seen as a snorky comment. The style of Ace Atkins writing is very critical and uses pathos that place himself above
us.
Ace Atkins begins by providing the reader with a scenario of two distinct persons driving a Prius and a Ford truck. He describes the stereotypical thoughts that may run through the Prius driver’s mind of the Ford driver such as being “a red stater”. The tone of Atkins introduction is certainly humorous and nonchalant as he explains that the man behind
Prius creates a positive image about their brand by designing their cars around the issue of global warming. Whether people believe in it or not, everyone knows how harmful car emission fuels are to the earth’s atmosphere. Prius advertises themselves as a brand that has helped reduce the amount of gases affecting the earth. This gives them credibility for being educated about the problems going on and coming up with a solution to benefit the earth and people. This allows the audience to trust Prius as a whole and their intentions.
By doing this he is making his evidence reliable since he uses two different styles of research and stating where he got his evidence. You can analyze the rhetorical appeals of ethos by looking at where the author gets into his evidence and how he states it as well such as, “I asked Todd Dawson, a biologist at Berkeley, to run McDonald’s meal through his mass spectrometer and calculate how much of carbon in it came originally from corn plant.” (p. 116). This will show you what type of author he is and where his intentions are with his writing. As for pathos, he talks about his own experiences with him and his family when it came to fast food. What his relationship with fast food is and his son, who seems to really enjoy fast food and how it effects his relationship with food such as, “My eleven-year-old son, Issac, was more than happy to join me at McDonald’s;” (p. 109). This means that the author is trying to be relatable to the audience. Finally logos, Pollan has brought in a scientists that did research on the fast food. Therefore, bringing in logic and scientific evidence, which brings in unbiased point of
While shopping at a local Trader Joe’s, Freedman spots a bag of peas, which have been breaded, deep-fried and then sprinkled with salt. Upon seeing this snack, he is in shock to know that this same store, which is known for their wholesome food, would sell such a thing. With a tone of exasperation, he admits that, “I can’t recall ever seeing anything at any fast-food restaurant that represents as big an obesogenic crime against the vegetable kingdom.” It was such an unexpected situation for him to come across this small snack that represented the opposite of what the wholesome-food movement is for. To settle his own confusion, he clarifies that, “…many of the foods served up and even glorified by the wholesome-food movement are themselves chock full of fat and problem carbs.” This further proves that just because a certain food is promoted by a health fad, it does not validate that it is genuinely better than fast-food itself. A simple cheeseburger and fries from any fast-food restaurant would more than likely contain less calories than a fancy salad from the next hole-in-the-wall cafe. Not only that, but the burger and fries will be tastier and much cheaper
...g statistics about the public’s health and make the future seem bleak, “the lifespan is shortening for new American children” (Pastor) and “ one in three children born after the year 2010 will develop type II diabetes” (Pastor). Pastor says that he is shocked by the impact and wants to break away from the cycle created. In his closing statements he convinces the audience to break away from the cycle away as well, by drawing on the seeds he planted with pathos, ethos, and logos. The film was well made and addressed all the issues of “organic” food and well informed the audience of what is occurring. Next time, an audience member goes to the supermarket to buy food they will probably remember what their children will look like in twenty years if they don’t take a more “organic” approach to their lives.
Rhetorical Analysis of “The Pleasures of Eating” by Wendell Berry In the article by Wendell Berry titled “The Pleasures of Eating” he tries to persuade the readers of the necessity and importance of critical thinking and approach to choosing meals and owning responsibility for the quality of the food cooked. He states that people who are not conscious enough while consuming products, and those who do not connect the concept of food with agricultural products, as people whose denial or avoidance prevents them from eating healthy and natural food. Berry tries to make people think about what they eat, and how this food they eat is produced. He points to the aspects, some which may not be recognized by people, of ethical, financial and
Andrew Simms, a policy director and head of the Climate Change Program for the New Economics Foundation in England, presents his argument about the impact SUV’s have on our roadways, and the air we breathe. “Would You Buy a Car That Looked like This? “. The title alone gives great insight on what the article is going to be about, (vehicles). “They clog the streets and litter the pages of weekend colour *supplements. Sport utility vehicles or SUV’s have become badges of middle class aspiration” (Simms 542). Simms opening statement not only gives his opinion on how SUV’s are the new trend, but he also paints a picture of what we see every day driving down our roadways. Simms also compares the tobacco industry’s gap between image and reality to that of SUV’s; stating that the cause and consequences of climate change resemble smoking and cancer. Simms comparison between SUV’s and cigarettes shows how dangerous he believes SUV’s are.
...ocessed, un-chewable food from their childhood. Pastor uses logos best by providing to the viewers many facts that support his point of view. These facts ranged from effects on the human body to the environment, all supporting that organic food is healthy. Ethos was also used effectively by incorporating interviews with professionals. Pastor was able to gain respect and authority because he has done his research on the topic. Lastly, pathos was used in the documentary to appeal to the emotions of the audience. Pastor accomplishes this by interviewing people who have touching stories involving the issue of healthy eating. Pastor effectively uses rhetorical technique to convince the audience that organic food is the healthy choice, leaving the viewers with only one thought to consider: Why not go organic?
In the Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan talks about 4 different models that we consume, purchase, and add it to our daily lives. Michael Pollan travels to different locations around the United States, where he mentions his models which are fast food, industrial organic, beyond organic, and hunting. I believe that the 3 important models that we need to feed the population are fast food, industrial organic, and beyond organic. Fast food is one of the most important models in this society because people nowadays, eat fast food everyday and it is hurting us in the long run. We need to stick to beyond organic or industrial organic food because it is good for our well being. Ever since the government and corporations took over on what we eat, we have lost our culture. In the introduction of the Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan states that we have lost our culture:
... Nestle’s quote, Bittman makes his editorial plea to ethos, by proposing proof that a woman of reliable mental power of this issue come to an agreement with Bittman's thesis statement. Bittman also develops pathos in this article because he grabs a widely held matter that to many individuals is elaborate with: "...giving them the gift of appreciating the pleasures of nourishing one another and enjoying that nourishment together.” (Mark Bittman) Bittman gives the reader the actions to think about the last time they had a family dinner and further imposes how these family dinners are altogether important for family time. Therefore, Bittman did a magnificent job in pointing into the morals of his targeted audience and developing a critical point of view about fast food to his intended audience leaving them with a thought on less fast food and more home prepared meals.
“If the most influential-voices in our food culture today get their way we will achieve a genuine food revolution. Too bad it would be one tailored to the dubious health fantasies of a small, elite minority.” (934) said Freedman. All the people who believe that wholefoods is the answer to obesity do not realize it is helping no one but themselves. The word Elite shows that this group of people believes that they are on top and that they are better than everyone. He groups elite with small and minority to show the low number of people who can actually fit into their group. What they do not realize is that not everyone can afford to buy the food they do. As I said earlier in the essay they seem to be out of touch with everyday experiences. Freedman is urging the Pollanites to lower their food prices if their food really is better for people. This way everyone can become
When we think of our national health we wonder why Americans end up obese, heart disease filled, and diabetic. Michael Pollan’s “ Escape from the Western Diet” suggest that everything we eat has been processed some food to the point where most of could not tell what went into what we ate. Pollan thinks that if America thought more about our “Western diets” of constantly modified foods and begin to shift away from it to a more home grown of mostly plant based diet it could create a more pleasing eating culture. He calls for us to “Eat food, Not too much, Mostly plants.” However, Mary Maxfield’s “Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating”, argues differently she has the point of view that people simply eat in the wrong amounts. She recommends for others to “Trust yourself. Trust your body. Meet your needs.” The skewed perception of eating will cause you all kinds of health issues, while not eating at all and going skinny will mean that you will remain healthy rather than be anorexic. Then, as Maxfield points out, “We hear go out and Cram your face with Twinkies!”(Maxfield 446) when all that was said was eating as much as you need.
I believe that the essay, “Did My Car Join Al Qaudea” by Wood Hochswender, is persuasive. The reason why I think Hochswender’s essay is persuasive because he makes several statements about why SUV’s are more efficient. Hochswender shows the use of ethos by stating “I choose not to whip around corners or to follow others so closely and at such high speeds that I have to make harrowing, emergency stops. I drive so as not to roll over (Hochswender 155).” I believe Hochswender is trying to get individuals to understand that it is not the SUV that makes the passengers unsafe, but more so the driver. Hochswender shows the use of pathos by stating “If some drunken driver veers across the center divider-I would prefer that my 9-year-old and I not be
Throughout the essay, Berry logically progresses from stating the problem of the consumer’s ignorance and the manipulative food industry that plays into that ignorance, to stating his solution where consumers can take part in the agricultural process and alter how they think about eating in order to take pleasure in it. He effectively uses appeals to emotion and common values to convince the reader that this is an important issue and make her realize that she needs to wake up and change what she is doing. By using appeals to pathos, logos, and ethos, Berry creates a strong argument to make his point and get people to change how they attain and eat food.
“Don’t Blame the Eater” is an article by David Zinczenko that explains to Americans, specifically overweight young Americans, about the risks eating at fast food restaurants and its cause of affecting one’s health. In his article, he tries to address the issue about America’s food industries by using literal devices such as tone, logos, ethos, diction, and organization in order to spread his message. He begins his article by addressing the topic and as he continues writing, he supports his topic by writing about personal experience and moves onto the reasons why his topic in a serious issue. Although he shows an overall clear progress, he does tend to have a few problems with his writing that could be improved.