Rhetorical Analysis Of 'A Genetic Of Justice' By Julia Alvarez

In the articles “A Genetic of Justice” by Julia Alvarez, “The text of Malala Yousafzai’s speech at the United Nations” and “On the Adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human” they talk about freedom and their human rights. The interesting thing about these articles is that they all fight for freedom. For instance, they are fighting for what they believe in. Also, these people were caring towards others because not only were they fighting for their rights, but others as well. In these articles, it displays the same rhetorical devices of diction and rhetorical device. Given these points these representatives like Minerva, Malala, and Eleanor are brave for standing up for themselves and others because it takes a lot of courage to speak up

and defend for your beliefs and others.
To begin with, “A Genetic of Justice” is good example of an article that displays the rhetorical device of diction. For instance, this article has a unique style of writing. Also, it talks about the character’s life and how things were when in the process of fighting for their belief. In the article it states, “About all these matters, my parents were silent, afraid that the ungratefulness would result in our being sent back to where we had come from.” (paragraphs 19) This evidence helps us understand the struggle of Minerva and her family when they were fighting for their rights.
Secondly, “The text of Malala Yousafzai’s speech at the United Nations” is an article that talks about a little girl who is fighting for her rights of an education.

During this process a lot happened. For example, many wanted to assassinate her for disobeying them and going against their rules. The thing was Malala didn’t care because she knew in her heart that she was doing the right thing when speaking. In the article it states, “ there are hundreds of Human Rights activist and social workers who are not only speaking for human rights, but who are struggling to achieve their goals of Education, peace and equality. Thousands of people have been killed by terrorists and millions have been injured. I am just one of them.” (Paragraph 3) She was a brave little girl for speaking up because not many had the guts to do what she did. Also, malala knew she was putting her life at risk ,but she still did what she did because now it’s not only about her, but others as

well.
Lastly, in “On the Adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human” is an article that talks about Eleanor Roosevelt fighting for others freedom and equality.

For example, she talks about how blacks aren't allowed to go to certain places. The reason being is the white's discriminate the black people for the fact that the color is different. The white people use this as an excuse to limit the black people's freedom. In the article it states, “certain provisions of the Declaration are stated in such broad terms as to be acceptable only because the provisions and article 30 providing for limitation on the exercise of the rights for the purpose of meeting the requirement of morality, public order, and the general welfare.” This means that everyone has the right to equal access to the public service in this country. On the other hand, it clearly states that everyone has their rights, but in reality the white community is limiting the black people's rights. Which I believe isn't fair because either everyone gets their rights or no one gets their

rights.
To conclude, the articles “A Genetic of Justice” by Julia Alvarez, “The text of Malala Yousafzai’s speech at the United Nations” and “On the Adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human” all have one thing in common, they discuss about fighting for freedom and equality. Also, the articles have the same rhetorical devices of diction and rhetorical device. For instance, the articles all have a unique style of writing because it uses advanced words and explain their thoughts really well. All in all, these articles are a good example of explaining their beliefs because the authors demonstrate how the characters fight their equality.