Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of tourism on local
Ugly tourist jamaica kincaid summary
How tourism affects culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“A tourist is an ugly human being. You are not an ugly person all the time; you are not an ugly person ordinarily; you are not an ugly person day to day.” These are the words that Jamaica Kincaid says about tourists. Kincaid believes that her opinion should be heard about how tourism ruins the cultural feel of different Throughout the essay Jamaica Kincaid inform and persuade the readers about tourism, Kincaid uses pathos and ethos to appeal to the audience, and how you can confirm the author’s argument. Jamaica Kincaid conveys her opinions about tourists and how ugly they can be. “A tourist is an ugly human being,” is used as the attention getter and used as a shock factor throughout the entire story line. Kincaid wants the reader and/or …show more content…
Because Kincaid is trying to persuade the readers not to be that ugly tourist that everybody hates. He uses tactical logistical reasoning as to why the reader should not travel. Kincaid refuses to let the readers look away from the real life situations and problems of tourism. Kincaid also uses the appeal of pathos as a way to get his point across. He goes as far as to mention that the natives of the places you are traveling to, are too poor to travel outside of their everyday life and tries to make you feel for the natives even more when he says “every native everywhere lives a life of overwhelming and crushing banality and boredom and desperation and depression…”. He tries to rope you in and make you feel bad for touring to a place where there are underlying suffrage, that you do not know is happening. Kincaid provides the readers with strong evidence on why tourism is awful. She states in tourist can get trapped in the “grass is always greener on the other side” effect. He uses this to his advantage when he talks about how miserable you are at your paying job, at your house with working plumbing, at home with your family and friends, and then goes over to the unknown and become another ‘rich’ face to the ‘poor’ and ‘sad’ faces in that
Whereas, the essay, A Small Place, written by Jamaica Kincaid in 1988, effectively uses an ironical tone to persuade and criticize the close-mindedness of tourists; the review, Antigua and Barbuda, published in www.wheretostay.com, adequately advises readers to visit, by addressing the different types of tourists who would be interested. One of the main differences between these two texts is the tone the authors use. In the essay, A Small Place, the author makes use of a 2nd person perspective to create a narrative the reader can follow and put themselves in the situation. This type of perspective directly points out and speaks to the audience.
Through the use of emotional arguments and social appeal the author, Kincaid, gets the feeling across that she was a victim of England. To get you to feel like the victim she uses lots of metaphors. In the first paragraph she uses the one, “England was a special jewel all right and only special people got to wear it”(p.61). It is right here that the author sets the tone of the essay. She gives you the idea that she was not special enough to put on this gem of England. In doing this she makes a social appeal to anyone looking for a view of colonization. In using descriptive language she make you feel sorry for her in the how she had to “Draw a map of England”(p.63), at the end of every test.
The article written by Alexis Celeste Bunten called “Sharing culture or selling out?” talks about the theory of “commodified persona” or the “self commodification” of a tourism worker in Sitka and how capitalism has influenced the way a tour guide is presented. Chapter eleven in Charles C. Mann’s book called “1491, New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus” is a slight summary of the second half of the book which talks about how similar Indians were more advanced than the colonists and that we should accept the fact that indigenous people and their societies have influenced American culture.
In "Bread" two children try to put their parents' house together (or perhaps take it apart) after their parents' accidental death; one seeks refuge in sarcasm and denial, while the other makes bread which will never be eaten and thinks on various kinds of "debris": the "still-smoking rubble" of his two-year marriage, the pile of clothes which has "nothing to do with how my mother wore my father's flannel shorts on Sunday to cook in..."In the stylistically innovative "Bring Your Friends to the Zoo," a couple (these are nearly always duets of longing) awkwardly try to dismantle (or remember?) their affair, while being directed by the narrator about how to move, what to see: "Once through the gate, face right.The Deer House, the Camel House ... As you face your right you see a path before you.Take it."The zoo would seem at first neutral ground, but we discover there is no neutrality, no one is the innocent bystander, the one-day tourist.In "Is Anyone Left This Time of Year?" tourism of another kind is explored when a recently widowed man visits a town where there are no more tourists, and once there, shell-shocked with grief, he merely repeats everything said to him, thus becoming an echo of his previous visits; absolutely passive, he is the compleat tourist, merely and only "seeing" the sights.
Rosalie Schwartz analyzes tourism during the Twentieth Century in Cuba. She focuses mainly on the 1920s, 1950s, and then ending with the 1990s. In the introduction, Schwartz briefly describes and makes the point that her research is based not on the history of tourism, but that tourism as history is the focal point. She looks at tourism from the aspects of behavior, attitudes, and cultures that influenced tourism in Cuba. Schwartz’s historical issue gives attention to the impact that Cuba’s tourism had on the social change that would leave an everlasting impact on the culture, behavior, and country as a whole.
... the plight of the Antiguan. At times she appears to revile Antigua, but she disproves any doubts about her true loyalty as she alludes to the hidden beauty of the country. At other times it seems as though Kincaid agrees with the treatment of the Antiguan natives, but she is doing so only in an attempt to point out the racism that is so embedded into Antiguan culture. So the answer to the question “is Kincaid an Antiguan or a tourist” is quite simply both.
The biggest aspect of Kincaid's argument that makes it flawed is her anger. That is not to say that there aren't times where anger is justified. At the same time, the harsh language that Kincaid uses to discuss tourists is only based on her perspective. In other words, when Kincaid calls the tourists “ugly” because of how they treat a vacation, it makes Kincaid seem like she is placing blame on the tourists for not being proactive in making sure that the workers in the tourism sector are not better appreciated. Another quote that indicates a lack of consideration for the tourists was “they (the natives) envy your (the tourists) ability to turn their own banality and boredom into a source of pleasure for yourself” (pg 18-19). The words “banality” and “boredom” indicate that Kincaid believes that the tourists’ lives are based on the rare time that they can go to another place to escape the monotony of their lives. Kincaid’s belief is flawed because it does not consider the fact that people are going on vacation in Antigua, because they heard that it is a tremendous place to go on vacation. More to the point, the language that Kincaid uses shows an unjustified anger at people w...
In part fictional and part autobiographical novel “A Small Place” published in 1988, Jamaica Kincaid offers a commentary on how the tenets of white superiority and ignorance seem to emerge naturally from white tourists. She establishes this by using the nameless “you” depicted in the story to elucidate the thoughts they have when visiting such formerly colonized islands. This inner mentality of the white tourists reveals how tourism is still a form of oppression for the natives of such formerly colonized tourists as it continues to exploit them. I will be focusing primarily on page 10 of the text to illustrate this.
Kincaid guides her readers through their vacation, illustrating the sights and experiences a typical tourist would encounter while visiting Antigua. However, Kincaid’s words are laced with sarcasm. Kincaid draws upon experiences with real tourists and condemns them by passing this criticism on to her readers. Kincaid writes, “You see yourself taking a walk on that beach, you see yourself meeting new people (only they are new in a very limited way, for they are people just like you). You see yourself eating some delicious, locally grown food. You see yourself, you see yourself…” (13). Here, she is commenting on the vanity of a tourist. By repeating the phrase “you see yourself”, Kincaid is hinting that the tourist does exactly that. The tourist is egotistical, caring only about their own paradisiacal vacation. This is further emphasised when Kincaid mockingly states “you could ruin your holiday” (10). She implies that tourists often turn a blind eye to the corruption that plagues the island and its government, intentionally choosing to overlook the injustice and hardships faced by the Antiguan natives. The “slightly funny feeling” (10) that Kincaid refers to is the tourist’s guilty conscience, thus Kincaid is accusing the tourist of inhumanely placing their own trivial getaway from their relatively comfortable lives over the basic human needs and rights of the natives. By directly addressing her readers, insulting and accusing them of such inconsiderate and heartless behaviour, Kincaid is trying to inflict feelings of guilt, hoping that her readers would reflect on the way they act when they inhabit another’s
A Small Place by Jamaica Kincaid presents the hypothetical story of a tourist visiting Antigua, the author’s hometown. Kincaid places the reader in the shoes of the tourist, and tells the tourist what he/she would see through his/her travels on the island. She paints a picturesque scene of the tourist’s view of Antigua, but stains the image with details of issues that most tourists overlook: the bad roads, the origin of the so-called native food, the inefficiency of the plumbing systems in resorts, and the glitches in the health care system. Kincaid was an established writer for The New Yorker when she wrote this book, and it can be safely assumed that majority of her readers had, at some point in their lives, been tourists. I have been a tourist so many times before and yet, I had never stopped to consider what happens behind the surface of the countries I visit until I read this essay. Kincaid aims to provoke her readers; her style of writing supports her goal and sets both her and her essay apart. To the reader, it sounds like Kincaid is attacking the beautiful island, pin-pointing the very things that we, as tourists, wish to ignore. No tourist wants to think about faeces from the several tourists in the hotel swimming alongside them in the oceans, nor do they want to think about having accidents and having to deal with the hospital. It seems so natural that a tourist would not consider these, and that is exactly what Kincaid has a problem with.
In an archetypal lens, there are many universal gestures that any reader would know, which will help them understand the plot. Analyzing Kincaid's writing can helps us understand not only the emotions she feels, but also a reoccuring theme we can all relate to. It doesn't surprise us how much hate she has towards the "tourist," because the way she talks reminds us how everyone has different mannerisms and when we see these different ways of doing things, it can be alarming, and will possibly want us to shut them out. "An ugly thing that is what you are when you become a tourist, an ugly, empty thing, a stupid thing,a piece of rubbish pausing here and there to gaze at this, and see that, and it will never occur to you that the people who inhabit the place in which you have just paused cannot stand you, that behind their closed doors they laugh at your strangeness (you do not look the way they look); the physical sight of you does not please them; you have bad manners (it is their custom to eat their food with their hands; you try eating their way, you look silly; you try eating the way you eat, you look silly); they do not like the way you speak (you have an accent); they collapse helplessly from laughter, mimicking the way they imagine you must look as you carry out some everyday bodily function." (Kincaid 17). The tourists are automatically on the outside according to
When first reading this article I was uncertain about how it fit into the category of travel writing. After all, Anderson is chiefly describing an attraction made to represent an older world—the whole affair was fabricated. Soon, it was apparent that this article was a perfect embodiment of historical travel writing. Dicken’s world is described in rich detail by Anderson. We learn quickly what type of place London was in the 1850’s—depressing, unsanitary, and riddled by disease. From Anderson’s descriptions it is easier to understand why Dicken’s work was so
Kincaid’s experience starts us with putting us as the readers into her text as the tourists of Antigua. Noting the tourists find the place of absolute beauty, but the natives of Antigua find the tourists ugly. She then goes on to the old times when Antigua was in colonial possession, but now has their people enslaved, which has corrupted the island. The people of Antigua dislike the tourists out of envy, in spite of being so poor they are not able to travel anywhere, and are ‘stuck’ in their homeland, just watching the travelers take in the beauty of their land when they are trapped in.
My second point is on Tourists. Why are there so many? 85% of people said that they annoy them as much as they do me. So what do they ...
There are many definitions for the word “tourist.” The known definition of a tourist is a person that travels for pleasure and isn’t born in the place they travel to. To some people, the tourists that come to Nantucket may be very annoying, rude, dirty, and smelly and they are not native to the island. While others may think they are nice, friendly, and very generous people that just weren’t born here, I tend to disgree. Just think of the many day-trippers who flock, like seagulls, to the Tavern and don’t leave a tip after treating the hardworking waitress in a rude manner, with their screaming kids whining and belching, and the horny husband who pinches her derriere as she walks away. To back up the definition of the word that I agree with, I have provided some other examples based on occurences I have been involved with or seen.