A Comparison Of Bombing Sarajevo And The Pippiest Place On Earth

668 Words2 Pages

Dimiter Kenarov’s article, “Bombing Sarajevo”, and Sam Anderson’s article “The Pippiest Place on Earth", can both be considered travel writing in their unique way. In “Bombing Sarajevo” Kenarov describes his time spent in the city of Sarajevo with young snowboarders. Sarajevo recently underwent a civil war and is still dealing with the hardships of the aftermath. The snowboarders of the city are focused on the future and disinterested in dwelling about the past. In “The Pippiest Place on Earth” Anderson visits Dickens’ World in London. While the theme park had several well executed concepts, it was ultimately disappointing. Anderson finds that he is able to connect with Dickens the most by visiting Rochester, a town which several details of Dickens’ stories were inspired by. Ultimately, both of these travel writings are historically informative and visually descriptive.

Both of these essays are examples of “history travel”. In “Bombing Sarajevo” we learn about the city’s past and its lasting effects on the current day. The title “Bombing Sarajevo” is literary in the sense that it has a dual meaning. During the civil war in Sarajevo, landmines were placed on Bjelasnica mountain. This is where the snowboarders frequently practice, even though active mines …show more content…

When first reading this article I was uncertain about how it fit into the category of travel writing. After all, Anderson is chiefly describing an attraction made to represent an older world—the whole affair was fabricated. Soon, it was apparent that this article was a perfect embodiment of historical travel writing. Dicken’s world is described in rich detail by Anderson. We learn quickly what type of place London was in the 1850’s—depressing, unsanitary, and riddled by disease. From Anderson’s descriptions it is easier to understand why Dicken’s work was so

Open Document