Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of different parenting styles
Effects of different parenting styles
Social stratification
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of different parenting styles
In the sociologist Annette Lareau’s monograph, Unequal Childhoods, we are shown what social stratification influences parenting and how this perplexes within itself. Lareau’s book is a profound study that examines how parenting styles differ amongst poor parents, middle class, and the working class. Lareau’s book also examines how these parenting styles ultimately shapes the child’s future, sometimes negatively and other times positively.
After viewing the short interview with Annette Lareau, I do agree with her findings. I agree with her findings not only because it was a study in which was conducted which means it was tested and the results are facts, but because it is something that I can relate to in the society. There are even films
…show more content…
As Lareau mentions in her interview, concerted cultivation is the middle class parents that take an active role in fostering opportunities and activities for their children. Lareau found that in both black middle class families and white middle class families, parents were very involved in overseeing the success of their children. This included being very active in their lives, choices, and academics. Middle class children are usually enrolled in a number of dissimilar activities. Most of these activities require time for children to spend on homework and academics. And other times, they would have extracurricular obligations such as play an instrument or playing a sport. This concludes that most middle class lives were often busy. This is a very interesting and agreeable finding. This is interesting because interaction to extracurricular activities helps the mind make more neural connections in which can be used in later interactions with people. In addition, interactions with people helps individuals learn and enhance in skills mostly unconsciously in which are essential in the world such as communication and the morals and values of society. Therefore, there is a bigger benefit to joining extra curricular activities (especially that there is time and assistance in academics for those who may need it and not receive it at home) and enjoining time into learning new things and exploring the world and it’s opportunities rather than going home after school and needing extra help with homework and not having someone to assist you, or even being bored and tired of playing video games and sleeping all
I was aware that child rearing differed upon classes, but I never thought that when I would learn about them, they’d be so spot on, at least the strategy that the working class and poor parents have adopted. I grew up in a single parent household and my mother barely had enough time to feed us in between her two jobs and sleeping. Don’t get me wrong, I love childhood and my mother even more for sacrificing so much for us, but I mean, this is the
In Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life, Annette Lareau discussed the extensive amount of research she conducted employing observational and interview techniques. She collected data on the middle class, working class, and poor families. She was trying to understand the impact of a child’s early parental guidance on the child’s life. She was able to conduct this research with 12 families, all of whom had fourth graders. She gathered enough information to conclude the major differences in the parenting styles of each type of family, which was directly correlated to socioeconomic status. Annette Lareau opens her book with two chapters to give the reader an idea on what the examples she gives will detail.
The book Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life published in 2003, takes a close look into the lives of different families in the United States and how they are affected by race and social class and how their family lives differ. The Author, Annette Lareau, discusses how social class affects the parenting styles and how these parenting styles are affecting the children. Although Lareau’s book could use a few changes, it is well written and it is a good read to help better understand how social class and parenting styles can affect the lives of different children on a personal level. In
After reading “Invisible Inequality: Social Class and Childrearing in Black families and White Families,” by Annette Lareau, it was evident that she collected much data from her study of different types of families. In this study with the help of other sociologists, Lareau went into the lives of both black and white middle class and working class/ poor families. In her study she observed the behavior of children at home, school, and in the public eye. She observed the parenting methods the adults chose to use and the child’s reaction to them. Lareau and her team were able to see what influences certain factors such as income, race, family size, home location, schooling, and career choices had on each family and their children. The purpose of this study as well as the central argument is very well addressed by Lareau in the text and leads to many well supported conclusions.
Lichter,Daniel T. and David J. Eggebeen. 1987. “Rich kids, Poor kids: Changing Family Structure and Income Inequality Among American Children.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, 23-27 Aug., Cincinnati, OH. 12 May 2014
...oming to an understanding of the daily struggles of every person, who attempts to raise a child in the American society. Inferring from the book, the extent to which the scholar discusses race as a key influence of childhood inequality is not as extended as that of social class. This is clear evidence that the Lareau dwells much on social class as the principal and prevalent theme in the American society towards parenting and child bearing (4). Indeed, at some point, Lareau reports that while race produces childhood inequality, most outcomes for children, from interactions to education, largely depends with social stratification (4). Therefore, she discusses that social class is more influential in relation to race.
The theme in working and poor class parents is that they are not as attentive to their kids as middle class parents are. However, this does not mean that they do not love their kids. It is just a different approach to development. This ties back into the major concept Lareau: concerted cultivation or natural growth. Working and poor class parents adopt a “let kids be kids” mentality and do not intervene as much. Middle class parents are very involved in their kids’ lives by enrolling them in various activities, but because of hectic schedules they to do not have a great deal of down time to spend together as a
The upper class are able to afford all kinds of things that put their children at a higher advantage. Whether it be playing tennis at a country club, private piano lessons, and etc. The lower class have less access to these types of learning experiences for their children. They are more of a self-taught learner, and success is rarely a solo achievement. That was the whole takeaway from Lareau's study. She conducted a study with twelve families within the middle and the lower class, and saw how they performed based on their parenting skills. She learned that they’re two child learning styles. First method is Concerted Cultivation. This is commonly used by wealthier families. These kids would have more privilege than the majority, "One of the well-off children Lareau followed played on a baseball team, two soccer teams...lessons" (pg.103-104.) and, "They expected their children... authority." Parents are highly involved with their child’s success, being active in their lives and their talents. Teaching them how to perform their own insights, as oppose of adults talking down to children. Second method is Natural growth. Parents see their children already growing and taking care of themselves and are seen as less whiny and more behaved. However, were not taught to speak up for one's self to a higher authority, "The poorer children were, to her mind, often better behaved...
... Reestablishing community goals and encouraging youths to engage in extracurricular activities will greatly improve outlooks on life and help them make the right choices for a better tomorrow.
In chapter twelve, Annette Lareau explains how family behavior is a characteristic of social class and explores how social class affects social mobility. Lareau says that childrearing is a mentality that is natural product of social classes, and that it is passed down a social class, which makes it a characteristic of the social class of the family. This is interesting because other ideologies state that family behavior may be impacted by social classes, but Lareau takes it further by saying that that family behavior is a definitive aspect of social class also. She also concedes that it is harder for children raised through natural growth to socioeconomically mobilize because concerted cultivation is the model by which institutions in society
In her article Mother Inferior?, Hanna Rosin, editor at the Atlantic, discusses that parents should rear their children in more supportive ways. By introducing Rosin’s experience of her own, Rosin also shows her objection to the child rearing philosophies that Amy Chua mentioned in the book The Battle Hymn of Tiger Mother. In general, I agree strongly with Rosin’s idea that children need to be less constrained by parents, whereas I disagree with Rosin's idea that all children have the motivation to work on their own. The author discusses how parents should do and what kinds of attitude they should have when rearing the children.
In Howard Garner’s argument, I can see where he has a point when he stated that “Harris and most of the authorities that she cites are not studying child rearing in general, indeed they are studying child-rearing largely in the white, middle-class United States during the last half century” (pg. 43). I believe as I had stated earlier that both our parents and peers could influence us in different points in our lives. However, for Judith Harris to have a better argument she could have used more studies outside of the United States. Nevertheless, either way both peers or parents have a major impact on our lives.
Do extra-curricular activities have a positive or negative effect on a student’s academic performance? If they do, then why do schools take activities away from students at the first sign of academic troubles? If they are scientifically proven to be positive, then why are they not curricular rather than extra curricular? There are numerous influences that impact the academic performance of a student other than after school activities. However, this study will focus on the effect of extra curricular activities on academic performances. In many cases, participation in extra curricular activities positively influences attendance and connection to school. This study will investigate the impact of extra curricular activities that require a daily commitment over an extended period of time, greater than a month. Athletics is the dominant after school activity that requires a daily commitment; therefore, this study will involve student athletes as well as students who are involved in other extra curricular activities. Another reason why student athletes will be a large part of this study is that there may be a correlation between the skills necessary to succeed in athletics and academics (American Sports Institute, 1991).
A wise man once said, "In life you can't force people to do something they don't want to do, or be someone they're not. You have to let people be who they are." In this quote, they are explaining how people should be able to live the life they want to that fits their standards and goals. Not living or doing something because others may believe can help you, because only you know what is best for you. This is one of the main reasons why I think it shouldn't be required of students to participate in an extracurricular activity. Furthermore, because it can create multiple financial burdens, rebellion in the school community, and it will cause more hurt than intended help.
Extracurricular activities can benefit students greatly through their personal lives and well being. According to Justin Coulson in his article on kidspot.com, students that are involved in extracurricular activities, such as sports or clubs, are generally healthier than those who do not participate. Extracurricular activities can help raise student’s self esteem and self awareness as stated by Joy Burgess in her article, “Extracurricular School Activities and the Benefits” at more4kids.info. Being involved allows the student to learn about the skills and talents they already have and can teach them new ones such as time management, organization, and prioritizing skills. It also allows the students to realize what they are good at or enjoy doing (Burgess). As similarly described by the College Board staff at collegeboard.org, extracurriculars can enable you to learn your personal talents, interests, ...