Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive and negative consequences of gentrification
Impact of television on our social values
Positive and negative consequences of gentrification
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive and negative consequences of gentrification
My response paper speaks directly to Murray Forman’s “Welcome to the City” essay, pecifically, the complex relationship the ghetto has with its inhabitants as well as outsiders. In the essay Forman says, “Youth continues to be framed against the American middle-class ideals of a liberated consumer culture” (47). Since our course is focused on black popular culture, I thought it would be interesting to examine the portrayal of domestic space occupied by black families on television sitcoms, a genre defined heavily by shows from the 1950s. Additionally, Forman specifically mentions Chicago’s Cabrini Green housing projects as an example of urban housing development, and that seemed like an invitation to analyze episodes of Good Times. Understanding the ghetto as both a real and imagined place needs to be contextaulized in the larger concept of homeownership and the American Dream.
Television and the housing boom are both products of post-war American prosperity. Both developments are linked not only temporally, but culturally as well. Their significance is often times interdependent. The introduction of network television programming into American homes began in the late 1940s, as did the housing, and post-War baby boom. Suburbs became the new melting pot as migration from ethnic working class neighborhoods created enclaves of whiteness. At the same time, families on television were reflecting this change in social hierarchy. Early television sitcom families were happy and safe, with a professional father, a loving, nurturing mother, and two or three well-adjusted children. And they were always white and money was never an issue. The suburban home was an oasis of domesticity, free from communism and atomic threat.
The house an...
... middle of paper ...
...based
solely on the setting of each family’s home.
Of course, that difference in setting speaks to race and social class, but those issues are not examined further in either sitcom. Where a family lives is dependent on what type of life they lead; their level of education, their economic prosperity, their happiness and quality of life. Of course, the same could be theorized about rich white families and poor white families, but the complication of racism and its perpetuation gets removed if that argument is made. White homogeneity was part of the attraction in selling the American Dream to potential residents. Good Times illustrates that living in the ghetto is tolerable by “black folks”, they are simply better suited for the hardship; while The Cosby Show is an example of an exceptional black family with family situations similar to those of white families.
Good Times is an sitcom about a poor African American family who lives in the ghetto. The Evans family is family of five living in a small apartment on each others back. James Evans the man of the house is bouncing around from job to job while his loving wife Florida Evans is a school bus driver and trying to maintain things around the house. Their first child JJ Evans is not your typically type of son. JJ is a smart, outgoing, and a hustle man. Thelema is the only girl. She is spoil and the type of sister that everyone has. Whatever she wants she gets and that makes her brothers mad. Lastly there is Michael. He is the baby and is the nerd of the family. Michael is all about his books and making his parents proud. Good Times was released in
A three generation African American family of five living in a small, substandard apartment in the city of Chicago faced many obstacles in order to thrive. Blacks often felt that they could “be somebody” when they saw the growing shopping districts, parks and lake side beaches as well as theaters, ballrooms and fancy hotels (Mays). While great strides had been taken in ...
While whites lived comfortable lives in their extravagant mansions and driving their fancy cars blacks had to live in a disease infested neighborhood with no electricity or in door plumbing. Approximately one thousand people lived in shacks that were squeezed together in a one-mile zone. The alleys were filled with dirt, rats, human wasted and diseases. Blacks lived in houses made of “old whitewash, a leaking ceiling of rusted Inx propped up by a thin wall of crumbling adobe bricks, two tiny windows made of cardboard and pieces of glass, a creaky, termite-eaten door low for a person of average height to pass through...and a floor made of patches of cement earth”(31). Living in such a degrading environment kills self-esteem, lowers work ethic and leaves no hope for the future.
Sudhir Venkatesh’s ethnography Gang Leader for a Day is a summary of his research through the University of Chicago in the 1990s. Venkatesh chose to do research on poor African-Americans in Chicago, and their experiences in public housing developments. He concentrated his study on the Robert Taylor Housing to better understand how residents lived and differentiated from those in other parts of the city. Venkatesh’s target population was those living in harsh living conditions, primarily black and poor. Throughout this paper, I will be addressing Venkatesh’s research and its limitations. I will also share my opinion on Venkatesh’s analysis and understanding of his findings about the residents, and how his experiences mesh with my own. In
For example, on the television sitcom ‘Good Times’ viewers observed a black family living in a Chicago housing project in poverty. Sitcoms of African Americans who did not live in poverty were uncommon until the 80’s. The Huxtables introduced me and everyone else to a new image of living as an African American. ‘‘The Cosby Show’’ enlightened me to a new sense of self-confidence and pride. Throughout its broadcasting years, the Huxtable family candidly crushed the stereotypical images of the African-American family.
The twentieth century was a time of tremendous change that commenced with WWI and the Great Depression. While WWI brought countless deaths, the Great Depression affected both urban and rural Americans. Yet, underlying these devastating events was the abuse of black Americans. Both whites and blacks had to cope with the major occurrences of the time, but blacks also faced strife from whites themselves. During the early part of the twentieth century, white Americans Russell Baker and Mildred Armstrong Kalish gained kindred attributes from their families, especially in comparison to that of Richard Wright, a black American. The key differences between the experience of whites and blacks can be found within the mentality of the family, the extent to which they were influenced by their families in their respective lives, and the shielding from the outside world, or lack thereof, by their families. Through the compelling narrations of these three authors, readers can glimpse into this racially divided world from the perspective of individuals who actually lived through it.
Williamson, Kevin. “The White Ghetto.” National Review Online. 9 January 2014. Web. 05 October 2014.
Obviously the television isn't a new technological development; it's been around since at least the turn of the 1920’s and was readily available for public sale by the late 1930’s (Stephens). After the Second World War, the television expanded with its introduction into the commercial mainstream, and by 1955 it was estimated that roughly half of all American homes had at least one (Stephens). Although certainly impressive, this statistic would only continue to burgeon throughout the decades with the rise of color TV and cable b...
Ever since television was introduced to America in 1947, it has changed a lot about American culture.
The 1950’s we started to see early sitcoms where the setting was urban, families were ethnic and working middle class. The most popular show at the time was “I Love Lucy”, it ran from 1951 to 1957. Later on in the 1950s we started to see other sitcoms, where it was families with children that lived in suburban areas. Some included, “The Donna Reed Show” that ran from 1958-66 and “Leave It to Beaver” that ran from 1957-63. The 1950s was
In American memory, the image of the 1950s is characterized by clean cut, all American families living in suburban neighborhoods without a worry in the world. Because Europe needed American goods to help rebuild their losses from war, the American economy boomed and began to shape into a material world. Homes became affordable to apartment residents, which exploded the suburb population, and new toys, such as televisions, convertible automobiles, and fancy kitchen appliance became well known in the American household. Furthermore old television shows such as I Love Lucy and The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet portray the 1950s family life style as pure bliss and suggest that this decade is filled with leisure activities and cherished moments.
... conclude the marketing techniques of the 1950’s Arvin TV reveals some common desires and values the 1950’s. Family was highly valued, not just any family but the “ideal” family. Men were expected to seek and create these families. Families were expected to be wealthy and not afraid to show it by having nice clothes, spacious living place and a stylish television set (from Arvin of course).The ideal family excluded the following non-whites, homosexuals, single women, and the poor. While it is entirely acceptable for men to watch woman on television for their entertainment of any form, but for a woman to own a television on her own or with her female lover, that is far from the ordinary and ideal. It goes to show that the threats of history can be found in many unexpected avenues. I leave you with the question, “What will they say about our ads in seventy-five years?”
The evolution of the sitcom also parallels the change in television from the Classic Network area to the convergence era, by illustrating that as families began to get busier and parents have to take on more work both inside the domestic sphere and out, families became more mobile to keep up with the lack of time they had due to work or other obligations. The prevalence of too much obligations and a mobile family unit worked to change the function of television from an event to one of distraction, whereby people would watch sitcoms that would closely mirror their own life to distract themselves from their own
Make room for TV: television and the family ideal in post-war America. 1992. By Lynn Spigel. The University of Chicago Press, Ltd. London
First of all we are going to go back in the past, talk a bit about “television” history, and how television became something necessary in a household.