Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosophy of special education
Brief reflection points special education
The importance of special education to teachers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Philosophy of special education
What specific intervention can the librarian use to improve reading and math skills of identified RTI (Response to Intervention) Tier II & III students?
Background
Mills Elementary is a Pk-5th grade elementary school and around 98% of the school is economically disadvantaged students. The school is made up of 52% Hispanics, 47% African American, and 1% White students. Tier II and III of the academic section of RTI is about 73% of students. The main concern about the RTI program is the high number of students on Tier II and III. The RTI program will allow in-depth tutoring for students in the two Tiers. The curriculum used at the school is Journeys for reading and math is Texas Mathematics by: McGraw Hill. The program will test monthly on the progression of the students reading and math by doing a reading and math mini-test. The school will have a cut-off point for both subjects to determine if the students are learning, if the test scores fall under the cut-off number, then students will come to tutoring before, during, and after school.
Mills Elementary has 8% of the students in the Special Education classes. Over the past few months, classroom size has increased and small groups are not pulled because the reading, math, and science coach are busy pulling students to learn how to pass the STAAR test. Students on Tier II and III are not being pulled consistently because of the high number of students in each Tier group. The librarian has a flexible schedule that allows for additional tutoring throughout the day.
RTi falls under the nation’s special education law. The RTI program helps school aged students that are struggling with academics or behavior, due to poor curriculum or instruction at one time in the student ...
... middle of paper ...
...ep directions _______________________
Additional Comments:
Appendix B
Student:
Grade: RTI INTERVENTION REPORT
Academic Year -
Meeting Date:
Teacher:
Summary of Current Intervention(s) Primary Concern:
Duration(time per week):
Progress Monitoring Data
Identify Assessments and
Attach Graph(s)
Who has been providing the interventions?
New or Additional Information
Analysis/Summary of Progress
Current Grades
Reading/ELA
Math
Science
Social Studies
Appendix C
Name:______________________________ Subject: _____________________
Week of: _____________________________
Student Learning Log
Instructions:
Use this Learning Log to keep track of what is being taught in this class and whether you have learned it.
What should I be learning this week? Respond to what was taught.
This is a reading intervention classroom of six 3rd grade students ages 9-10. This intervention group focuses on phonics, fluency, and comprehension. The students were placed in this group based on the results of the DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency assessment. Students in this class lack basic decoding skills.
The Section 504 Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was designed to meet the needs of students with disabilities and who do not fall under or qualify for special education services. For example, a student that is perfectly capable of meeting all curricular requirements on assessments and assignments but cannot hear very well will fall under the 504 act. They will not necessarily meet the special education qualifications of the IDEA. Therefore, they will not be classified as special education students and will not receive the same services as special education students, even though they need modifications and accommodations to ensure their overall success. A major curricular impact of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is that all educators are legally required to provide students that meet the requirements to be qualified or classified as a 504 student with the same course of study as general educations students without making changes to their course work. Educators do this by way of allowing additional time on assignments and assessments. They also do this by changing the environment or method of lesson delivery to said students if and when necessary to ensure
Thornton Fractional South High School represents a diverse school building in the South Suburbs of Chicago, Illinois. We consist of a traditional 9th through 12th grade building with the exception of busing students to the District 215 Tech Center for vocational classes. We share these resources with our sister school TF North. Although we consistently outperform TFN, we are behind the state averages on both the ACT and the PSAE. On the ACT, we are below the state average on the composite score as well as on all three recorded sub-categories. We were closest to the state average in Science and the furthest in Reading. As for the PSAE test to measure those students meeting and exceeding standards, we are again behind the state average. TFS averaged 40.5% of students tested to meet or exceed standards. Meanwhile, the State of Illinois average was 53%. Currently, we are on the Academic Watch Status year 2. We were unable to meet the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) or the Safe Harbor Target Goal for Reading and Mathematics which are the two target areas. Our goal as a school is to reach the AYP and attempt to reach and exceed the state averages on the ACT and PSAE.
RtI was designed to provide early intervention to students that are experiencing difficulties in developing literacy skills. Throughout RtI, assessment data is collected to monitor student progress, and is used to determine if the intervention should be continued or modified (Smetana 2010). A common consensus is that the RtI framework consists of three tiers: Tier I, Tier II, and Tier III. In Tier I, primary interventions are used that differentiate instruction, routines, and accommodations to the students that need little to no interventions. The students in this tier are often times classified with the color green.
... and RTI’s have shown their significance in schools and classrooms all over the country. These programs are great for helping children and we can see the progress all the way though their academic years, helping children reach their full potential should be the desire for all parents and educators.
To begin, the RTI process my school begins with the teacher. At the beginning of the year, a battery of assessments is conducted to help identify students’ levels in reading. Students take the first Dibbles benchmark to determine their fluency rate as well as the Star test to diagnose phonemic awareness, vocabulary, and comprehension. Also, students are administered the Words Their Way spelling inventory to identify and create word study interventions. Once teachers have gathered all the data, they create a reading learning plan for students who scored significantly below the benchmark for the beginning of the year.
Woodward, M., & Johnson, C. T. (2009, November). Reading Intervention Models: Challenges of Classroom Support and Separated Instruction. The Reading Teacher, 63(3).
The Individuals with Disabilities Act is a federal funding statute that provides "financial aid to states in their efforts to ensure adequate and appropriate services for disabled children." IDEA seeks to improve the educational results for children with disabilities. It also provides guidelines for determining what related services are necessary and outlines a "due process" procedure to make sure these needs are adequately met. According to the IDEA, all children must be educated in the least restrictive environment.
In conclusion, it seems as though all the positives of the response to intervention program outweigh any negatives about it. The RTI program is extremely helpful in identifying any student that is having academic difficulties at an early age. Whether these students should be considered in the special education program or not can also be determined by using the RTI program. There is no reason to allow students to fail before any intervention is even considered. Anything that is beneficial in helping students succeed in their academic achievements should be viewed as a
In 1991 the Public Law 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act was replaced by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. This law was passed to provide free and appropriate public education to every child with a disability. It requires that each child with a disability “have access to the program best suited to that child’s special needs which is as close as possible to a normal child’s educational program” (Martin, 1978). The Individualized education program (IEP) was developed to help provide a written record of students’ needs and procedures for each child that receives special education services. The IEP will list all the services to be provided, the student's performance level, academic performance, and modifications in place for the student.
Response to intervention (RTI) is an assessment procedure that consists of a multi-step approach to progressively intensive intervention and monitoring within general education for purposes of improving achievement outcomes and accurately recognizing students with learning disabilities. Components of the RTI process include universal screening, multi-tiered levels of support, evidence-based intervention, and using students' responsiveness to evaluate the status of their progress (Jenkins, Schiller, Blackorby, Thayer, & Tilly, 2013). Universal screening measures for students are not likely to result in definite identification for special education. Before students are placed they must be correctly identified with a precise assessment procedure. Many students who are at risk, or struggle academically are assessed with the RTI model to prevent failure and determine eligibility of services. Students, who are identified as at-risk for reading difficulties are provided with additional instructional interventions, also known as tier two intervention, in addition to their regular curriculum instruction. Students with persistently insufficient response to tear two interventions are given more intensive interventions at tier three levels (Denton, Vaughn, Tolar, Fletcher, Barth, & Francis, 2013). These interventions provided are specific to each individual students needs and implemented in accordance to recommendations from their teachers. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the reading curriculum focusing especially on tier two and tier three instructional interventions of the RTI model.
Public Law 94-142: The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, now called Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), requires states to provide free, appropriate public education (FAPE) for every child regardless of disability. This federal law was the first to clearly define the rights of disabled children to receive special education services if their disability affects their educational performance. A parent of a special education student also has basic rights under IDEA including the right to have their child evaluated by the school district and to be included when the school district meets about the child or makes decisions about his or her education. If a child is identified as in need of special education services, the school district must devise a written individual education program (IEP) for the child, which includes related services. An IEP is a statement of a student’s special education and related services including speech services, psychological services, physical and occupational therapy, counseling and assistive technology and transportation. In addition, this legally binding, individualized plan outlines reasonable educational goals for the student and is reviewed and updated yearly.
High functioning Special Education students in grades six through eight have to sit the same SC-Ready Assessment as the Regular Education students. In the self-contained Intellectual Disability class, there are twenty students, 14 males and 6 females, age ranges from eleven to fifteen years old. These students are mostly African American boys with different socioeconomic background. Some of these students have behavior issue and are moved from school to school. It is assumed that these students have already possess the necessary skills to cite evidence and create a summary since they are high functioning. Majority of the students have Mild Intellectual Disability and are intellectually two to three years below their peer. They are average readers
... all the teachers, except for the multi-disability teacher, having an Intervention Specialist licensure. This allows the teachers to teach students in a cross-categorical situation in promoting academic excellence. The RTI program is designed to further enhance the needs of students with disabilities, under Title I, and is also taught by qualified and licensed teachers (personal communication, July 10, 2009).
Special education is no longer restricted to schools that cater for specific disabilities. Increasingly mainstream classrooms must cater for a diverse range of abilities and be inclusive of children with disabilities, therefore providing special education (Heward as cited on Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010). In catering for all children within a class, teachers also need to provide intervention as necessary. Intervention according to Heward (as cited on Education.com, 2011) intends to reduce, eliminate and/or limit the hurdles faced by students with disabilities that may prevent them from maximising their learning and becoming productive members of society. This essay will discuss how teachers can provide all three kinds of intervention; preventive, remedial and compensatory on behalf of individual students who may require it (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010). Each type of intervention will be explored with examples to demonstrate the possible use of each one and the potential issues that may be associated with them.