Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature review on employee resistance to change
Literature review on resistance to change
Factors that cause resistance to change in an organisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literature review on employee resistance to change
Individuals when faced with any major change will be inevitably resistant and will want to preserve the status quo, especially if they think their status or security within the organization is in danger (Bolognese, 2010). Folger and Skarlicki believe that organizational change produces skepticism in employees which make it problematic and possibly even impossible to contrive improvements within the organization (as cited in Bolognese, 2010) Therefore, management must understand, accept and make an effort to work with resistance, since it can undermine even the most well-conceived change efforts (Bolognese, 2010). Furthermore, Coetsee states for organizations to achieve the maximum benefits from change they must effectively create and maintain a climate and culture that does not support resistance and rewards acceptance and support ( as cited in Bolognese, 2010).
Therefore, it is important to understand what resistance is and how to reduce the affects from resistance. Bolognese (2010) looked at several examples of different definitions for resistance and one example by Alvin Zander explained resistance as behaviors that are intended to protect an individual from the negative effects of change which could be either real or imagined. Another definition of resistance by Zaltman and Duncan is any behavior that serves to maintain the status quo even in the face of server pressure to change. Finally, in the view of Folger and Skarlicki resistance is any behavior that seeks to challenge, disrupt, or invert prevailing culture of assumptions, discourses, and power relations (as sited in Bolognese, 2010). Although there are several different definitions for resistance to change, it is clear that resistance is an effort to avoid chang...
... middle of paper ...
...nce is coming from, facilitates listening and respect while focusing on the objectives of the change (Palmer, Dunford, & Akin, 2009).
Conclusion
Managing resistance starts with dialogue that engages and reveals the underlying reasons for resistance (A. Gilley, J. Gilley, & Godek, & 2009). Resistance to change is a complex issue and managers and leaders need to take the time to understand why and where the resistance is coming from if they have any chance of being successful. There are numerous reasons why an employee might be resisting the change and there are lots of approaches to address resistance, but without understanding why there is resistance, leaders are unprepared to deal with the issue. Therefore, leaders need to make the time to involve employees in the process, understand and respect their concerns, and work towards clear and focused goals.
Change affects more than just a program or a process within an organization, change affects employees, collecting data on employee’s readiness and willingness to accept a change will help leaders know if the organization is socially ready for change (Cole, Harris, and Bernerth, 2006). A change might be positive for an organization but if the employees who will be affect by the change are lost in the process then it could create a greater issue than not making the change. Leadership needs to communicate and inspire the employees to be positive toward the change, seeking to enhance their job satisfaction not make changes that will increase their desire to leave. This data is best collected early in the change initiative allowing leadership to properly cast the vision while addressing concerns. This requires leadership to create platforms for employees to engage in the change initiative freely (Ford, 2006). Employee attitudes can be measured through these dialogues providing leadership with necessary measureable data (Hughes, 2007).
The resistance to
In his short story, A Rose for Emily, well-known American writer and Nobel Prize laureate, William Faulkner, narrates the consequences of people not changing with the times. He lived in the south when slavery was acceptable and includes this in many of his stories. Faulkner’s purpose is to emphasize to his audience that people must accept change and evolve or risk isolation and ultimately dying alone. Faulkner’s views on change are brought out effectively in “A Rose for Emily” through his use of setting, tone, and diction. This paper will explore these strategies used by Faulkner to convey to his audience the importance of being able to adapt to a dynamically changing world. It will also answer the question of whether or not Miss Emily was stuck in the past and unable to move forward.
As a person one might find that we follow a specific routine on the day to day basis. Sudden changes to these routines feels weird and out of place. In William Faulkner’s “A Rose For Emily” based in a fictional town called Jefferson taking place during the twentieth century. The time period is indeed an important factor because southern tradition was above all of the highest importance. This short story gives the audience details of life during that time in which they followed the values of southern tradition and the importance to never stray away from those traditions. The context of the story is laced with subliminal messages of humanities resistance to change.
Kegan, R. & L. Laskow Lahey. (2009). Immunity to Change: How to overcome it and unlock potential in yourself and your organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Kegan, R., & Laskow Lahey, L. (2009). Immunity to change. How to overcome it and unlock the potential in yourself and your organization. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
Most subtle resistances will not create any large scale change but allow resistance to continue through everyday resistance. Syncretism is a form of subtle resistance that has proven to be very effective by allowing double victory. Overt resistances often develop after there has been a prophecy from God which instigates a revitalization movement. Overt resistances are necessary; without them change would not exist. For a successful resistance using both subtle and overt forms of resistances allows for the highest probability of
Prevention of resistance is most effective when implementing change. Preventing the weight of inertia in a workplace allows the change to happen in a timely manner with minimal problems. As Lee (2004) emphasizes, leaders have the ability to effect change and performance. If someone is accountable for outcomes and poor habits, outcomes will improve. The manager must show a caring attitude over the process of change and welcome any positive innovation. This caring attitude will become contagious to the employees working under him and become a priority to them as well. Approaching the change in an accepting, open-minded manner can decrease the vulnerability and frustration associated with change. How the change is presented can make the biggest difference in the outcome of the change. The manager must show that blaming will be avoided at all costs. One will only ask why, not who, to avoid the feeling of belittlement. This can allow employees to become comfortable with voicing their opinions and mistakes, which can allow an even greater range of improvement. The manager must also encourage...
In the face of pressure to change ingenuities in organization face with resistance. It involve barriers and risk in process of acquisition there have many reason such as no assurance for high performance, efficacy or better work condition so employees is resistance for it.
Prior to launching, the company had recognized that the importance of the human side of change could not be underestimated and proactively identified potential sources and courses for resistance (Forlaron, 2005, p. 38) therefore were prepared to combat resistance with empathy and support, communication, participation and involvement.
People are generally unwilling to change. Although a few warmly embrace change, most show negative reactions. Employees perceive change as disruptive and there are various reasons why they might resist it. Change coming from someone other than ourselves can make us feel that we are losing control and autonomy. To counteract this, leaders or upper management should allow those affected to be involved in the decision making process.
This shows that similar actions in the future could be experienced with ‘foreign element’ problems of resistance and lack of resilience towards risky changes that require a response (Satir et al, 1991).
Individuals go through a reaction process when they are personally confronted with major organizational change (Kyle, 1993; Jacobs, 1995; Bovey & Hede, 2001). Within this process there are four phases that it consists of: initial denial, resistance, gradual exploration, and eventual commitment (Scott & Jaffe, 1988; Bovey & Hede, 2001). Resistance to change is the initial area to focus on. The issues of organizational change and resistance to change have received a lot of attention over the past decade (Macri, Tagliaventi & Bertolotti, 2002). The perceptions of individuals play a fu...
There are many aspects in change leadership and people’s fear is one of them. Working as team member in a company takes a long time to adapt to other team members and work productively. Those employees who cannot accept changes fast and adapt to new team members may have troubles to work effectively and may be causing stagnation of other workers and a...