In his short story, A Rose for Emily, well-known American writer and Nobel Prize laureate, William Faulkner, narrates the consequences of people not changing with the times. He lived in the south when slavery was acceptable and includes this in many of his stories. Faulkner’s purpose is to emphasize to his audience that people must accept change and evolve or risk isolation and ultimately dying alone. Faulkner’s views on change are brought out effectively in “A Rose for Emily” through his use of setting, tone, and diction. This paper will explore these strategies used by Faulkner to convey to his audience the importance of being able to adapt to a dynamically changing world. It will also answer the question of whether or not Miss Emily was stuck in the past and unable to move forward.
Faulkner begins his story by telling his audience the whole town went to Emily Grierson’s funeral. The men went out of respect for her and the women out of curiosity. He describes her house in great detail. “Only Miss Emily’s house was left, lifting its stubborn and coquettish decay above the cotton wagons… an eyesore among eyesores” (Faulkner, 177). He compares her house to that of a flirtatious woman. Her house is so decayed it’s more fascinating and memorable to the viewer than the town’s cotton wagons are. This suggest that Miss Emily was stuck in the past and did not make improvements toward the future. When the new Board of Alderman call upon Miss Emily concerning her delinquent taxes she reverts back to the past as depicted in the following quote;
Her voice was dry and cold. “I have no taxes in Jefferson. Colonel Sartoris explained it to me. Perhaps one of you can gain access to the city records and satisfy yourselves.”
“But we hav...
... middle of paper ...
...ld have accepted the changes that were taking place with the Post Civil War Era. Instead of becoming a recluse and living out the rest of her days alone.
Work Cited
West, Ray B. Short Story Criticism, Volume 1: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works
Short Fiction Writers. Kansas City, MO: Gale Research, 1988. Print
May, Charles E. Critical Survey of Short Fiction. Ipswich, MA: Gale Research, 1981.Print
Cromie, Jenny. Short Story Criticism, Volume 42: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Short Fiction Writers. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group, 2000. Print
Nesbitt, Anna Sheets. Short Story Criticism, Volume 35: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Short Fiction Writers. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group, 2000. Print
Charters, Ann. Major Writers of Short Fiction: Stories and Commentaries. New York, NY: Bedford Books of St. Martin’s Press, 1993. Print
"Unit 2: Reading & Writing About Short Fiction." ENGL200: Composition and Literature. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. 49-219. Web. 19 Apr. 2014.
May, C. E. (2012). Critical Survey of Short Fiction: World Writers (4th ed.). Ipswich: Salem Press.
Studies In Short Fiction 18.1 (1981): 65. Literary Reference Center. Web. The Web. The Web.
Stein, Karen F. "Amy Tan." Critical Survey of Short Fiction, Second Revised Edition (2001): 1-3. Literary Reference Center Plus. EBSCO. Web. 13 Apr. 2011.
Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Joseph Palmisano. Vol.
Robison, James Curry. Peter Taylor: A Study of the Short Fiction. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1988. 78, 89-95.
(Sept. 1976): 35-39. Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Carol T. Gaffke. Vol. 26. Detroit:
Wilson, M. & Clark, R. (n.d.). Analyzing the Short Story. [online] Retrieved from: https://www.limcollege.edu/Analyzing_the_Short_Story.pdf [Accessed: 12 Apr 2014].
Callahan, John. "Review of Love and Trouble." Short Story Criticism Vol. 5. (Essay date 1974).
Evans, Robert C., Anne C. Little, and Barbara Wiedemann. Short Fiction: A Critical Companion. West Cornwall, CT: Locust Hill, 1997. 265-270.
Faulkner, Howard, and Theresa L. Stowell. "Richard Wright." Critical Survey Of Long Fiction, Fourth Edition (2010): 1-9. Literary Reference Center. Web. 5 Mar. 2014.
Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Janet Witalec. The.
O’Brien Edward J. “The Advance of the American Short Story.” Short Story Criticism 8 (1923): 230-231.
In "A Rose for Emily," William Faulkner's use of setting and characterization foreshadows and builds up to the climax of the story. His use of metaphors prepares the reader for the bittersweet ending. A theme of respectability and the loss of, is threaded throughout the story. Appropriately, the story begins with death, flashes back to the past and hints towards the demise of a woman and the traditions of the past she personifies. Faulkner has carefully crafted a multi-layered masterpiece, and he uses setting, characterization, and theme to move it along.