Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Feminism in the handmaid's tale book
The handmaids tale dystopian text
Margaret atwood handmaid tale role of women
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Feminism in the handmaid's tale book
Margaret Atwood’s 1985 novel The Handmaid’s Tale explores through the portrayal of dystopian state, the shocking notion that the choice to take or abandon action in the present can transform the future. Dystopias portray an idealised world and paradigm of social excellence, which once scrutinised exposes an artifice of oppressive societal control reflecting the imperfections of social mechanisms and the simultaneous inadequacies of the human condition. Through her depiction of a chauvinistic totalitarian state, Atwood investigates the appalling complications and consequences of the dystopian construct, specifically through repression, the loss of personal choice in shaping one's future, and the consequent loss of identity. A conceptual centrepiece …show more content…
Developing from a fear of authority, Offred is increasingly uncertain of her surroundings, becoming repressed and unable to act against the predetermination of her fate by Gilean society with independent thought. Such behaviour can be observed in her rhetoric response towards the questioning of her happiness ‘Yes, we are very happy I murmur. I have to say something. What else can I say?’ where despite denoting her apprehension towards society’s oppressive totalitarian regime, she chooses to submit externally as ‘it’s as dangerous not to speak’. A similar situation is depicted where Offred is once again forced to choose between the risk of deviating from the standard and repression. ‘She was gang-raped at fourteen and had an abortion...But whose fault was it? … Her fault, her fault, her fault, we chant in unison. Who led them on? ... She did, she did, she did.’ The repetition of the feminine pronouns in ‘her fault’ and ‘she did’ emphasises Offred’s choice to submit to the chauvinistic values of Gilead and, by extension, the future enforced upon her by society. This idea is reinforced by Offred’s words ‘I would not be able to stand it, I know that…I’ll say anything they like, I’ll incriminate anyone… I’ll confess to any crime, I’ll end up hanging from a hook on the Wall’ in which a literary allusion to George Orwell’s 1984 depicts the capitulation of the protagonist to dystopian authority. As is demonstrated by these examples, the repression of independent thought can result in the devastating inability of the dystopian protagonist to act against their fate as determined by
They are not free to choose when or who t... ... middle of paper ... ... f no use. Again here Atwood presents Offred in a negative manner. Atwood then from showing Offred in a negative way, to positive, then back to negative, she shows us the club of Jezebels and shows us hopes for Offred again.
Offred, among other women depicted in this novel, tries to overcome this dominion. In her own way, she attempts to do this by ensuring the Commander’s expectations of her behavior which could result in her freedom. Thus, there is a present power struggle between the Commander and Offred throughout The Handmaid’s
In Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, Offred recounts the story of her life and that of others in Gilead, but she does not do so alone. The symbolic meanings found in the dress code of the women, the names/titles of characters, the absence of the mirror, and the smell and hunger imagery aid her in telling of the repugnant conditions in the Republic of Gilead. The symbols speak with a voice of their own and in decibels louder than Offred can ever dare to use. They convey the social structure of Gileadean society and carry the theme of the individual's loss of identity.
This establishes how the society is controlled, tense, and lacks the freedom of knowledge. In this case, censorship reveals the act of silencing and the unimaginable thought of freedom permitted in order for individuals to follow the “ideal” society 's norm. In the novel Offred recalls, “I don’t know what the words are right. I can’t remember. Such songs are not sung anymore in public, especially the ones that use words like free. They are considered too dangerous.” (Atwood, 66). This quote portrays how Offred has been brainwashed to an extent that she does not remember some of the memories from her past such as the lyrics to a song. The government has made sure that after censoring information for many years, people soon forget the feeling of freedom and self expression. People no longer know what it is like to have an opinion about something, and they no longer feel that there is any importance in their lives. The only tasks that citizens of Gilead need to do, is repopulate; therefore, it is not important to live a free and joyful life. The government makes sure to censor words like "free" so that it does not trigger any memory or an idea for the citizens of
Offred finds herself believing that she failed as a mother, seeing the photograph of her daughter, Offred realizes that she would be just as good as dead and considers herself as “erased”, this could lead to changes in her character by her thinking it’s futile to keep being suppressed by Gilead’s laws and try to challenge them. In the following chapter Offred is noticed taking a risk by accepting a request from the commander, she finds her life dull and boring even if she does communicate with the commander. In the novel Offred reaches her breaking point, “ I know without being told that what he’s proposing is risky, for him but especially for me; but I want to go anyway. I want anything that breaks the monotony, subverts the perceived respectable order of things” (Atwood 231). Offred decides to go on a date with the commander because she is tired of living an isolated, dull life, and all of this is caused by her believing she doesn’t have anything to live for since she lost connections with everyone in her past.
Dystopian worlds are not products of the present, but are depictions of contemporary society. The realisation that oppressive fictional worlds bear an irrefutable resemblance to modern society, is fundamentally the most shocking aspect of the dystopian genre. This notion is advanced in Margaret Atwood’s speculative fiction novel ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ (1985), which satirises political concerns that were prevalent during the second wave of feminism, and cautions contemporary society of the dangers of religious fanaticism. In doing so, it exposes the vices and follies of Christian theocracy; highlighting it’s decaying values and the loss of identity. Through Atwood’s exploration of the Gileadean regime, it is evident that the similarities between her dystopian world and the modern world are truly shocking.
In Margaret Atwood’s novel, The Handmaid’s Tale, Atwood creates a society of oppression in which she redefines oppression in common culture. Gilead is a society characterized by highly regulated systems of social control and extreme regulation of the female body. The instinctive need to “protect and preserve” the female body is driven by the innate biological desires of the men. The manipulation of language, commodification, and attire, enhances the theme of oppression and highlights the imbalance of power in the Gilead society.
There are two kinds of freedom, “freedom from and freedom to” (31) throughout Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. Freedom from is a negative liberty that involves external restriction to a person’s actions. On the other hand there is freedom to, a positive liberty the one can act upon their own free will. The two different categories of freedom are discussed and debated through a feminist view point. We explore and try to understand the way in which the difference between “freedom from” and “freedom to” is applied to females in society. This novel gives us two contrasting ways of liberal thinking. You are free if no one is stopping you from doing whatever you might want to. The story appears, in this sense, to be free. On the other hand, one can
Similarly to Montag, reading provides Offred with a sense of rebellion and acts as a way to fight against conformity, as women are not allowed to read. The Latin phrase which is carved into her closet symbolises inner resistance to Gilead, allowing her to feel as though she can communicate with the woman who engraved the message; even more so does it make Offred rebellious, when the meaning of the phrase is revealed to be “Don’t
The Handmaid’s Tale is a dystopian novel, written by Margaret Atwood, about Offred’s experience in an oppressive government and how she deals with it. Atwood expresses her thought on the possible oppression brought by a government through generic dystopian conventions. The Handmaid’s Tale conforms
She realizes the privilege that she had after she lost it and now she wants it back, at least for a second. Now, she is craving freedom, freedom that she used to have before. Offred talks about the room that she lives in now, but she doesn’t call it “her room”. She remembers about the hotel rooms that she used to live in with her husband, about all the rights that she used to have, saying: “It seems like something so impossible now, like something you’d make up” (Atwood 50). After men took over Gilead, the past seems like people are talking about fairytales, like it is something made up.
Throughout The Handmaid’s Tale, the author Margaret Atwood gives the reader an understanding of what life would be like in a theocratic society that controls women’s lives. The narrator, Offred, gives the reader her perspective on the many injustices she faces as a handmaid. Offred is a woman who lived before this society was established and when she undergoes the transition to her new status she has a hard time coping with the new laws she must follow. There are many laws in this government that degrade women and give men the authority to own their household. All women are placed in each household for a reason and if they do not follow their duties they are sent away or killed.
Though Offred is developed as a character through her opinions on female sexuality, she is further characterized by her individuality and willingness to defy her social expectations as a female, assigned to her by her government. In Atwood’s work, the narrative is told by an intelligent individual named Offred who is oppressed by Gilead’s female expectations but is not afraid to defy these assigned roles despite not being a traditional heroine (Nakamura). Even as Offred’s previous identity is stripped away from her, she retains small pieces of her womenhood and individuality through defiant actions such as manipulating men with her feminity from swaying her hips slighty in their line of sight to making direct eye contact with certain men, which she is forbidden from. On the other hand, a major act of rebellion from
Margaret Atwood's “The Handmaids Tale” is about a fictitious totalitarian state in the not-too-distant future. The main character Offred has the task of the maid, she was assigned to a commander and must be at his service once a month, so that she will get pregnant by him. This is necessary to maintain the population, because the population is slowly dying out and the birth rate is falling steadily. The system is well thought out, perfectly clear and ice cold. This story is very diverse it its setup, the reader is submerged in a joining of style, the perfect setting, a well throughout plot and theme that pulls the reader in via the connection that flourishes throughout the story with the main character.
It is too simplistic to merely suggest that Offred gains empowerment through sexuality, as from a feminist perspective we could also argue that through ‘wordlessly’ ‘silenced’ and ‘silently’- holds the semantic field of oppression, she is able to ‘clamour’ and fight her way through the patriarchal regime and attempt to fight against the subjugation of women. The sexual revolution of 1960’s influenced by the Thatcher/Reagan era is cleverly used by Atwood to highlight the damning effects of suppressed sexuality as the stream of consciousness renders Offred as slightly delusional through flirtatious and ‘insinuating’ language such as the ‘bricks of the house are softening’ trying to release her suppressed sexuality through any means. Despite this, her sexuality here can be defined as empowering as the ‘bricks’ symbolise a totalitarian Gilead, but she is able to mould the ‘bricks’ to be ‘warm and yielding’ through her defiant sexual