Freedom In The Handmaid's Tale

1144 Words3 Pages

There are two kinds of freedom, “freedom from and freedom to” (31) throughout Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. Freedom from is a negative liberty that involves external restriction to a person’s actions. On the other hand there is freedom to, a positive liberty the one can act upon their own free will. The two different categories of freedom are discussed and debated through a feminist view point. We explore and try to understand the way in which the difference between “freedom from” and “freedom to” is applied to females in society. This novel gives us two contrasting ways of liberal thinking. You are free if no one is stopping you from doing whatever you might want to. The story appears, in this sense, to be free. On the other hand, one can …show more content…

No one whistles.” (31) The freedom expressed, “freedom from”, is positively illustrated. The women are somewhat protected from men and out of harm’s way. However, women may have a hard time finding a soulmate, or possible partner. Women like Offred’s are strong while oppressed by the social culture of the sex life customs. A sex life is an obligation now, for fertile females. Aunt Lydia tells Offred “not to underrate it” because in some way, it is better than “freedom to”. Women’s “freedom to” was taken away because of social issues such as sexual revolutions, birth control, sexually transmitted diseases as well as a decreasing population.
The book hints at other reasons like the destruction of the traditional nuclear family as well. The Gilead society simple does not want single mothers or children growing up without parents despite having no regard for women. Women are restricted so much that they are treated as precious objects, machines even as Aunt Lydia points out “A thing is valued, she says only if it is rare and hard to get”(141) referring to the production of “normal” children, children without any birth defects which within the society they are having problems

Open Document