Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between people and animals
The relationship between people and animals
The relationship between animals and humans essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relationship between people and animals
Before divulging into the biological aspects and psychologically driven actions that prove sympathy in animals, one must understand the reason why the presence of sympathy in animals seems to be a novel concept. Contemporary animal compassion is primarily driven by access to information about the cruel treatment of animals particulary in slaughterhouses and labs. Therefore, this information is one of the primary causes of widespread animal compassion. In 1995, “two-thirds of Americans agreed with the following statement: ‘An animals’ right to live free of suffering should be just as important as a person’s right to be free of suffering’” (Leslie and Sustein). However, despite this widespread belief, animals are still seen as inferior beings …show more content…
17th century French philosopher Rene Descartes defines animals as “mindless automata” or mere machines with no conscience or rationality. Moreover, by stating that human communication is a special trait which the animals or brutes lack, Descartes, in his “Discourse on Method”, implies his belief of the specialty of the human race. As he states, “ For it is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even expecting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming from them a statement by which they make known their own thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect or fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same...they cannot speak as we do, that is, so as to give evidence that they think of what they say” (Brown, Hudecki, Kennedy and Snyder 163). Descartes believes that animals do not possesses the ability to communicate with rationality or conscience. He therefore concludes that “...this not merely show that the brutes have less reason than men, but that they have none at all, since it is clear that very little is required in order to be able to talk” (Brown, Hudecki, Kennedy and Snyder
He discusses "animals subjected every year to agonizing research center experiments"(Rifkin) and "raised under the most heartless conditions." He additionally cites that animals are "for butcher and human utilization." These words, words like subjected, coldhearted, and butcher have staggeringly negative meanings and infer thoughts of ruthlessness and viciousness. On the off chance that we take after Rifkin 's reasoning, and animals resemble individuals, and we butcher (for eating no less) and place needles in their eyes in a lab- - that is essentially unsatisfactory. This is the thing that Rifkin need us to get it. For Rifkin, this is the present circumstance however it doesn 't need to be. On the off chance that people comprehend that animals are particularly similar to us, we will need them to be treated with the same admiration and poise. Right now, we are not doing this. However, we can.
“…animals, plants and even “inert” entities such as stones and rivers are perceived as being articulate and at times intelligible subjects, able to communicate and interact with humans for good or ill. In addition to human language, there is also the language of birds, the wind, earthworms, wolves and waterfalls – a world of autonomous speakers whose intents (especially for hunter-gatherer peoples) one ignores at one’s peril” (Manes 15).
Review of Descartes: An Intellectual Biography and Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
Four journalists named Helen Jones, Larry Andrews, Marcia Glaser, and Fred Myers thought it would be a good idea to create a nonprofit organization to help animals that have are treated cruelly by either abuse or when they are left alone. The Humane Society has been helping animals since November 24, 1954(2). Their mission since the beginning has been celebrating animals and confronting cruelty. There are a great number of things that the Humane Society has been doing for the animals, like saving them from people who want to harm them. The list of animals that the Humane Society helps is very long, because they don’t just help the household pets that you might have thought. The conditions of the Humane Society change due to the types of animals
Giving animals credit for human emotions allows us to empathize with them. The woman in “The Buffalo” longs to empathize with an animal, one who can “teach her to keep her own hatred. . . .which belonged to her by right but which she could not attain in grief” (Lispector, 1972: p. 152). As a recently devastated woman, all she wants to do is loathe the man who broke her heart, but she is unable to do so because of her undeniable love for him. She believes that an animal can best demonstrate the feeling she cannot find on her own. When she comes across the buffalo, she is finally able to understand the feeling of hatred within her, because the buffalo’s passivity reflects her subconsciously projected emotions. In doing this, she is able to empathize with the animal and learn more about herself.
Rene Descartes views humans and animals on completely separate levels. He claims that animals do not possess intelligence and only act through their nature. While humans can perform a multitude of tasks by reasoning, animals can only carry out tasks where nature has given them the skills to do so. One of Descartes’ main arguments about animal’s inability to reason is that they are unable to communicate. If animals are born with the same general organ structure as humans, what’s stopping them from communicating with us? To Descartes, it’s their lack of intelligence. Sure parrots and some other animals can mimic human sounds and words, but they lack the ability to think about what they are saying.
As I have progressed through this class, my already strong interest in animal ethics has grown substantially. The animal narratives that we have read for this course and their discussion have prompted me to think more deeply about mankind’s treatment of our fellow animals, including how my actions impact Earth’s countless other creatures. It is all too easy to separate one’s ethical perspective and personal philosophy from one’s actions, and so after coming to the conclusion that meat was not something that was worth killing for to me, I became a vegetarian. The trigger for this change (one that I had attempted before, I might add) was in the many stories of animal narratives and their inseparable discussion of the morality in how we treat animals. I will discuss the messages and lessons that the readings have presented on animal ethics, particularly in The Island of Doctor Moreau, The Dead Body and the Living Brain, Rachel in Love, My Friend the Pig, and It Was a Different Day When They Killed the Pig. These stories are particularly relevant to the topic of animal ethics and what constitutes moral treatment of animals, each carrying important lessons on different facets the vast subject of animal ethics.
Goodall argues that her readers have an ethical obligation to protect animals from suffering, but she also implies that it might be necessary sometimes to abandon that obligation. She points out that animals share similar traits with human beings: they have a capacity for certain human emotions, and they may be capable of legitimate friendship. Goodall’s evidence for this claim is an anecdote from her research. She recounts that one chimpanzee in her study, named David Greybeard, “gently squeezed [her] hand” when she offered him food (62). Appealing to readers’ emotions, Goodall hopes to persuade readers that the chimp is “sociable” and “sentient,” or feeling (62). According to Goodall’s logic, if researchers are careful to avoid tests that cause human suffering, they should also be careful to avoid tests that cause suffering for other life forms.
Mulkeen, Declan and Carter, Simon. “When Should Animals Suffer?” Times Higher Education Supplement 1437 (5/26/2000): p34
The belief of human superiority, also known as anthropocentrism, is vague and a biased opinion. It can be thought of like the idea of racial, gender or religious supremacy. People cannot go and compare themselves as a whole and animals if they have little understanding about how animals, other than them, think. As humans, they would like to think of themselves as important, but in most cases people think they, as a species, are the most impo...
The ugly truth is that animals are dying at the hands of their owners everyday, some in very violent ways that can be avoidable given the right solution. Slaughterhouses, puppy mills, dog fighting, and so on, are just a few examples of how animals are being treated badly by people. Animal cruelty is a form of violence which, un...
In addition, “This shows not merely that the beasts have less reason than me, but that they have no reason at all” (Descartes 28). The comparison of Locke’s statement that “brutes” as he calls them “…have not the faculty of abstracting, or making general ideas, since they have no use of words, or any other general signs” (Chapter 11, Of Discerning, and other operations of the
Descartes argues that animals and machines are essentially the same because animals do not have reasoning, akin to a machine. He denies that animals can think or communicate, arguing that animals lack the capability to reason, so they cannot comprehend the full meaning behind a thing, only that a thing is. For example, an animal can know that the snapping of a twig means pain or death if they don’t run, but it won’t recognize that the snapping means hunter, bow and arrow, desire to kill. Descartes states that animals can make certain movements and sounds to appear as though they feel, but they were programmed to do so when certain stimuli were encountered. He argues that animals lack the irreplicable “part” that humans have which prevents animals from communicating in such complex ways as language, “for one sees that magpies and parrots can utter words just as we do, and yet they cannot speak as we do”. He also takes note that animals do not act on intelligence, as they can do something better than we can, but they do not excel in everything we can; therefore they act only as nature programmed, and not as cognitive beings. Descartes’s argument is false because animals are
The experiments and other data show that animals are not just driven by instincts alone. There is more to them than that. It is hard to watch dogs play and believe that they derive no fun or pleasure from it at all. Animals have shown that they are sensitive to their social surroundings. They punish one another and alleviate other’s pain. Some monkeys in established communities attack those that find food and don’t share. These studies are important. A better understanding of how animals are feeling could create a whole new guideline of rules on the way animals should be treated. Humans should not be so arrogant to believe they are the only animals capable of emotion. How are we capable of seeing from their viewpoint and assume they feel no emotion.
Although their minds are not as advanced as a human's, animals are still capable of thought. Frans de Waal, author of "The Whole Animal", feels that humans and animals are closely related, through anthropomorphism. I agree with anthropomorphism, but not with anthropodenial. I also disagree with Rene Descartes' statement that animals are machines, because just as humans have different individual personalities, animals of the same species also have different behavioral characteristics. For example, some cats are arrogant and rude, while others are kind and playful, just like people. Georgia, the chimpanzee who spit water on unsuspecting visitors, did not do this out of instinct. Instinct would have told her to swallow the water.