Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors affecting academic motivation
Factors affecting academic motivation
Influence of motivation on student academic performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors affecting academic motivation
Students are not receiving the ideal education in today’s educational system. Many students go to class and follow a strict schedule and simply go through the motions. “He cannot indulge his genius, he cannot delight in personal relations with young friends, when his eye is always on the clock, and twenty classes are to be dealt with before the day is done” (Emerson 106). Students are not getting the appropriate education, thus forming uninterested kids who anxiously watch the clock, waiting for the final bell to ring. Since teachers expect students to see through their eyes, programs do not allow gifted students to excel, and education is not based on student's individual needs, the education system must be changed.
When teachers expect students to see through their eyes, students do not absorb the majority of the information. Expecting the student to fully understand the subject
…show more content…
when teachers instruct in this way is unfair. The teachers who teach this way may only skim the surface of the subject because they already know the material, leaving students guessing and unable to connect: “The explanation, it turns out, lies in how these books, even the best of them, are being presented in the classroom” (Prose 93). Even with the best material available being taught, students gain nothing unless it is presented in an easily obtainable way. In order to learn difficult information, students need to be able to build on what they already know and really dig into it. Overwhelming students with a multitude of new information at one time only allows them to scratch the surface of one topic prior to having to move on to the next. “We don't want to add to your information glut, we want to offer some ground from which to perceive the rest of what you will see” (Gitlin 157). Everything a student learns is built upon previous knowledge. Fully comprehending a subject and being able to connect before being forced to move to the next topic is critical in gaining a true education. Achieving this takes teachers who are able to see through the students eyes rather than their own. In education today, teachers and school officials do not like to leave anyone out. Students who have the ability to excel in school are paired with students who are not as gifted. This is good in a social point of view, however gifted students are being anchored by this. Some students need to keep growing their education instead of staying stagnant where they are. Some incredibly gifted students become so frustrated that they no longer put forth the effort and self-destruct. “Since I wasn't given a real chance to improve, I decided after a while that I didn't really care how I did” (Mori 133). Students need to be pushed in order to reach their full potential. Classes should be available for students who need to be challenged in class. Universal, standardized assignments do nothing for students who need more so students are left needing more. Classes must be separated by the strength of the student for full potential to be reached. If all of education was based on a student's individual needs and interests, students could flourish.
Education today is not doing enough to individualize. Students are forced to learn about things they aren't interested in. Teachers shove material that students are completely disinterested in directly down their throat. Think of this as force feeding a child. I hated squash when I was younger. When my mom made me eat it, my hatred for squash only grew. However, when my mom gave me bacon, I would willingly eat as much as possible. Now think of this in terms of school topics. When teachers force students to study something they are not interested in, often times they become less interested in it because of a lack of willingness to learn it. If kids were to study something that they were very interested in, the kids would be more willing to put forth effort and expand their knowledge on the subject. “He can learn anything which is important to him now that the power to learn is secured (Emerson 104). Children are able to pick up curriculum far easier is the subject is important to
them. Not all the concepts of today's education are flawed. Sometimes students understand the subject better when the teacher tries to put their own vision into the eyes of the student. The teacher is experienced enough in the subject they are able to project the information well enough for the students. Also, gifted individuals are not always weighted down. Most schools today offer Advanced Placement (AP) or College in the Schools (CIS) courses. These allow gifted students to take the classes they need in order to really excel while also saving large sums of money if the classes are passed. It is also apparent that some schools do attempt to individualize education. Therefore, some concepts of education must be altered. Since teachers expect students to view subjects as they do, some programs do not always give gifted students a chance to excel, and education is not based upon a student's individual needs, the education system has to changed. With this in mind, we must change the education system in the aforementioned ways so that generations of students to come will not experience the fails that are present in education today.
Teachers themselves are often left to make the best of what little they have to work with. A narrow curriculum with little for scholars to decide themselves leaves them feeling like completing cookie-cutter worksheets is boring and pointless. Over time, students begin to hold educators with contempt and become disgusted by school and the tedious, rote labor that comes with it. With no enthusiasm, defeated students scores plummet and the faculty in turn can develop a bad attitude about students. The worst part is this combination produces a negative loop that often only spirals further downward.
Special focus needs to be allotted to not only the kids struggling but the kids who are excelling. Learning is the sole purpose of school, and for advanced students who already mastered the classroom skills, they need an extra challenge so they are learning too. Gifted education is essential for fully developing and engaging precocious children. Lubinski said, “If you’re trying to solve problems in the world like climate change and terrorism and STEM innovation, and transportation and managing our health care, you want intellectually precocious youth who have had their intellectual needs
Gifted and talented programs are intrinsically valuable to many children’s education as they provide a system in which all students involved are engaged, challenged, and intellectually stimulated. In "How People Learn", Donovan, Bransford, and Pellegrino (1999) stress the importance of each student being given reasonable and appropriate goals based on his or her level of understanding and competency (p. 20). Gifted and talented programs help institutionalize the attempt to meet all student’s needs by providing uniquely appropriate challenges which aim to keep every student engaged, thus receiving the best chance at success. Although there are many valuable and important aspects of gifted education, there are also significant issues rooted in the base of America’s gifted and talented programs, one of which I will address throughout this paper. In my opinion, the most notable problem which troubles gifted and talented programs is the system by which students are selected to join their school’s gifted and talented program.
When it comes to education, it is about helping people discover, refine, and develop their gifts, talents, passions and abilities; and then helping them discover how to use those gifts, talents, abilities in ways that benefit others and oneself (Bull, 2015). However, with education, there are many places where this does not happen and learners may fall between the cracks. Schools are heavily measured on testing, student outcomes and student numbers that it has become the main focus to excel the school district—but what about the students? I recall a time where I was sitting in a classroom and the teacher was going over a math lesson. Many students struggled and were having a difficult time following along with the task. The teacher started
Nowadays, students are being spoon fed information in the classroom instead of actually “learning”. Teachers, who should be inspiring students to be individuals and going out to seek and learn are instead basically giving students the information just to make it easier upon themselves. Although it may be easy now, in the future when the same students that have been fed information have to go out and actually learn and find information, they won’t be able to. Students are too reliant on teachers giving them information so they won’t have to do work. Students in this generation are being complacent in a “short-cut” society and take the easy way out in everything they possibly can.
...e actually interested in, they could begin to view the school day as an obstacle to just push through. They could have a negative opinion of the information they are learning and be more resistant to it. Overall, if schools catered more to the individual needs and interests of each student, thereby promoting individuality, students would have more interest in their education and would benefit more from it.
Sir Ken Robinson stated students are required to think in the way an educator thinks. This morfs those students into what that educator thinks that student should be, even if that is not what the student wants to become. School systems drive students to focus on math, science and other core classes, and tend to lean students away from performing art class that they comprehend as useless. Most school systems make core class credits more weighted than elective classes. So to
One of the most controversial things about gifted and talented education is the criterion educators use to identify the gifted and talented. In the past, a student’s intelligence, based on an I.Q. score, was considered the best way to determine whether or not they qualified as gifted. As a result of using this method of identification, many gifted and talented students are not discovered nor are they placed in the appropriate programs to develop their abilities. Talents in the arts or an excellent ability to write are not measured on an I.Q. test but are abilities that may certainly qualify a student as gifted or talented.
Education is meant to be the key to a successful life. It is supposed to inspire great ideas, and prepare each and every generation for their future. However, school for today 's generation fails to meet those requirements. Every student knows education is important, but when school is not engaging or in some cases, even relevant, it makes learning difficult. Improving the school system is something educators attempt to accomplish every year. Despite their best efforts, there are numerous flaws students see, but adults overlook. There is a lack of diversity for students to learn, an overabundance of testing, and students’ voices are being ignored on how to create a more productive learning experience.
This cycle of obedience and passive acceptance can spill over into other aspects of life where learners conform to beliefs and values without critically evaluating them. Brian Crittenden (1972: 146) speaks about “mis-education” which occurs when the content the teacher presents is a “violation of a ‘critical inquiry”. In other words the teacher presents information is such a way as to exclude any opportunity for enquiry.
“What makes a child gifted and talented may not always be good grades in school, but a different way of looking at the world and learning.” That’s what the senior United States Senator from Iowa Chuck Grassley once said. When students get a “F” on their exam, that does not necessary means they are stupid, or they do not know the material. It could only mean they have a different way of learning, or a different way of explaining the material which the teacher is not aware of. There are different ways of learning that students have, and there are different ways they apply their knowledge into real life. Therefore, grades are not the best way to judge the students’ standing in their classes, nor is it the best way to judge their learning process. In addition,
The overall essence of education or knowledge acquisition is reflected in an axiom by Confucius which says “Tell me, and I will forget; show me, and I will remember; but involve me, and I will understand. Back then, it was clear that learning was a comprehensive process which involves passionate exchanges between students and their teachers; unfortunately this is not the case in most modern classrooms. Instead of the expected bidirectional communication between learners and teachers, in the modern learning environment there is a unidirectional system which involves the teacher incessantly hurling facts at students who, due to their passive roles as mere receptacles, have fallen asleep or; in the case of “best” students are mindlessly taking notes. This leads to a situation where knowledge has neither been conferred nor acquired.
Parke, B. (n.d.). Challenging gifted students in the regular classroom. Retrieved March 1, 2004, from http://www.kidsource.com/kidsource/content/Challenging_gifted _kids.html
The two philosophies that I have chosen to write about for my Education Philosophy Paper includes progressivism and existentialism. Progressivism focuses on the child rather than the subject matter. Due to society always changing, new ideas are important to make the future better than the past for students learning. This educational philosophy stresses that students should test ideas by active experimentation. Learning is rooted in the questions of learners that arise through experiencing the world. Progressivists believe that individuality, progress, and change are fundamental to one 's education. Existentialism is a highly subjective philosophy that stresses the importance of the individual and emotional commitment to living authentically. It emphasizes individual choice over
Learning is commonly defined as the process of acquiring new, or modifying existing, knowledge through experiences. To me, learning is an ongoing process that continues throughout our lives. When referring to Robert E. Slavin ‘s book, Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice, he mentioned how people are already engaged in a learning environment where they receive stimuli everywhere they go, but they are only aware of some of the stimuli (p.129). By referring to Slavin’s book, what real learning is to me is when an individual actually notice those stimuli, learned particular information and skills from those stimuli, and being able to apply the things they learn to their daily life. Furthermore, when referring to the Operant Conditioning theory by B.F. Skinner, which is mentioned in Slavin’s book, real learning is also when an individual had a change in knowledge and behavior that is caused by experience or consequences, no matter if it is a positive or negative consequence.