More handpicked essays just for you.
Plot summary of The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell
The most dangerous game connell summary
The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It's not murder, it's hunting. When hunting, it's hard to understand how the pray feels. Richard Connell, author of “The Most Dangerous Game” explains what it feels like to be hunted. It’s hard to know what something is like until you have been through it yourself.
Rainsford doesn’t get it. In “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford, the main character, explains that he doesn’t think that hunting animals or hunting in general is a bad thing to do. “You’re a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels?” (Connell 1) Rainsford doesn’t think that the animals that he is hunting even know what is going on, but as he will soon find out, they really do. As the story continues Rainsford finds himself in a bit of a tough situation.
“You’re a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels?”. The story “The Most dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell introduces an adventurous type of thriller with two main characters named Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff. Both of which are hunters who in the story play a “game” invented by General Zaroff out of pure fear of becoming bored of the hunt. General Zaroff is a big fan of the hunt and everything he says about the hunt is to be taken serious. Rainsford and General Zaroff are described to be excellent hunters through the traps Rainsford makes, all the big game Zaroff has hunted, but Zaroff is better at hunting through the fact that the hunt has began to bore and he needs more of a challenge hunting humans.
Where does the line of sport and murder intersect in hunting? Is it when the species being hunted is able to reason? Or is it when the species being hunted looks just like the hunter? In both movie and film, we see a man fight for his life and another going against all codes of ethics. While Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” and Ernest B. Schoedsack’s film adaptation both have several similarities, the difference are also apparent in each respective media.
Rainsford is known for his extravagant hunting skills, even General Zaroff speaks of Rainsford as is if he has inspired him to become a hunter. Rainsford talks about hunting with passion, while he is speaking to Whitney he tells her it’s “the best sport in the world” (19). Rainsford has no guilt when he kills animals, he even tells Whitney that it’s nonsense when she mention the jaguars have feeling. But Rainsford shows immediate disgust when Zaroff brings up his hunting of humans, “hunting, great heavens, what you speak of is murder” (26). This only the first of many times that he reacts with great displeasure.
A skilled hunter sprints desperately through the woods, realizing the futility of hiding from his greatest foe: his own kind. Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” is the story of a hunter that becomes the hunted. The story explores the sense of extreme terror the protagonist feels being pursued by a psychopath living on a mysterious island. This protagonist, Rainsford, has many traits that aid him in his battle with the general. By demonstrating his cunning, sly, and remorseful traits, Rainsford shows the story’s theme of “walking a mile in someone else’s shoes”.
In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist, Rainsford, is a smart, clever, resilient man who keeps a cool head in stressful and dangerous situations. Rainsford is not allowed to leave the island he washes up on after he falls off the yacht he was traveling on, because the mentally disturbed general wants to hunt people with Rainsford. Rainsford makes a deal with the general to win his freedom. If Rainsford can evade Zaroff for three nights, then Rainsford is free to leave the island. During the hunt, Rainsford must think quickly and be resourceful in order to stay alive. Rainsford is an extremely experienced hunter who writes books about his hunting experiences. When Rainsford is running from the
In Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game Rainsford’s motivations changed from wanting to be a great hunter to trying to stay alive. As Whitney and Rainsford are headed to Rio to hunt they are talking about the great sport itself, hunting. Rainsford agrees with Whitney and says that hunting is, “The best sport in the world” (Connell 1). This shows he enjoys hunting by saying that it’s is the best and most enjoyable sport in the world. If you are passionate about something it can motivate you to try new things and in his case, hunting new animals. After Rainsford falls off the yacht and wanders to the island he then finds a home and knocks on the door. Ivan answers and General Zaroff soon approached Rainsford and saluted him. After allowing
To some this story might seem like a tragedy, but to Christians this is a beautiful story. Although young Harry dies at the end, he is accepted into the kingdom of God, which is far superior to anything on Earth. A non-religious family raises him and the first taste of Christianity he gets makes him want to pursue God. In Flannery O’Conner’s short story, The River, the allure of Gods grace and the repelling of sinful ways are shown heavily through Harry.
To Mr. Rainsford, hunting is like football to a NFL player. Hunting plays a huge role in his li...
“I wanted the ideal animal to hunt," explained the general. In The Most Dangerous Game the antagonist, Zaroff, decides to hunt a new animal, since he is bored of his typical hunting. This was due to him believing that he is far too good to continue hunting these animals since they had no reason. So, he decides to hunt one with reason, humans. With having him hunt humans instead of “actual animals” this causes a great conflict between him and the Protagonist, Rainsford. Rainsford believes in having equal power for all and that killing people is one of the most inhumane acts on can condone. These characteristics that each character has, has a much deep meaning behind them. With Rainsford characteristics symbolizes democracy. But on the other
Hunting accidents often injure or kill horses, cows, dogs, cats, hikers, and other hunters.Some hunters mistreat dogs just as the animals they hunt. Dogs who are used for hunting also suffer. They’re often kept chained or penned and denied routine veterinary care such as vaccines and heartworm medication. Some are lost during hunts and never found, and others who are turned loose at the end of hunting season to fend for themselves often die of starvation or get struck by vehicles. Also like other forms of thrilled violence, hunting leads to desensitization(make less sensitive) to the suffering and pain of others. “ A study conducted by Northeastern University and the Massachusetts SPCA found that people who abuse animals are five times more likely to commit violent crimes against humans. The majority of inmates who are scheduled to be executed for murder at California’s San Quentin State Prison “practiced” their crimes on animals, according to the warden.” So my opinion on hunting is that it’s bad but not everyone thinks like me and or care about animals the way that I
A true hero is somebody willing to sacrifice themselves to do good deeds and help others in need at all costs. A hero does not inflict pain upon other people just because they want to and do bad things. Rainsford is not a hero because he killed General Zaroff, a hunter who challenged Rainsford in a hunt. It’s a game where Zaroff hunts his “prey”, or Rainsford. Rainsford has to elude him for three days, if he does, he wins. So Rainsford is not a hero because he killed Zaroff when it wasn’t necessary and he doesn’t care about other’s feelings, just himself. He told Whitney, “You’re a big game hunter, not a philosopher, who care show the jaguar feels?”. Rainsford doesn’t care about other’s feelings. Then, after the game, he told Zaroff, “I am
A social outrage has broken recently amid the scandal of Cecil the Lion’s death. Cecil was illegally hunted and killed by the American dentist Walter Palmer. Since then, it has caused the world to change their minds on the effects of trophy hunting. Succeeding the death of the renowned lion, a recent poll in America displays that on a three to one margin, the respondents said they would rather be tourists in a country that prohibits trophy hunting, instead of one that does not. The debate is ascending as more hunters proudly present their ‘trophy’ on social media. Many nature conservatives and animal protection agencies are raising awareness because of the fact that Cecil died in a meaningless and violent manner.The problem is not only in America, but around the globe. Trophy hunting should be illegal in the world because it is merely killing animals without a meaningful purpose, and it produces harmful effects to the environment.
The Rainy River is a watercourse between Minnesota and Canada which tested O’Brien’s bravery to either enlist in or flee the Vietnam War. O’Brien states that the “The Rainy River… separated one life from another.” He also states that, “...Canadian waters, across... dotted line between two different worlds.” When he was in the river, he sees “hallucination” of his family and friends which reminded him of “ the embarrassment” he felt for running away. The Rainy River symbolized the rebirth of O’Brien into a new world. He also uses symbolism to portray the old man like a god. Tim O’Brien states that Elroy Berdahl “saved his life”. Tim was lost emotionally when he arrived at Canada. Elroy guided him and “offered exactly what(he) needed”. “He was there at a critical time.” Elroy knew O’Brien situation and wanted to help him make the right choice. On the 7th day, Elroy “guided(him) across the river” and “...must’ve planned it.” That day, the necessity of making a choice once and for all becomes clear to O’Brien.
The Symbolism of Rain in Chinese and Foreign Literature and Songs on Bad Luck. Introduction It has been seen that almost all authors use symbol within their works of literature in order to pull the attention of their readers. Using such symbolic concept helps the authors in creating a secondary meaning. It also helps in connecting the gaps. Symbols need careful analysis, while in some circumstances it is quite clear.
There was a time when hunting an animal for food was necessary for survival, but meat is now processed and packaged for our convenience. I have never hunted an animal, although I have gone fishing and in some respects, I could ask if fishing is as ethical as hunting an animal for food. I remember how it felt to cast my line out, reeling it in slowly hoping to get a bite. When I did get a bite, the fight between the fish and me was thrilling. In retrospect, the same feeling is similar, a hunter has after he stalked and killed a deer or elk. However, does the feeling of excitement when you have caught and killed animal right? Do we rationalize killing an animal for food to mask the excitement that comes from the kill? I would say yes to that, because I really did not need that fish for food even though I did eat it I still enjoyed the catching of it. Yet, there are those who do hunt for food, in remote areas it would be easier to hunt game than to drive 20 or 30 miles into the local town for hamburger. Perhaps for them there is a justification to hunt. As Peter Singer writes, “Eskimos living in an environment where they must kill animals for food or starve might be justified in claiming that their interest in surviving overrides that of the animals they kill.”(Singer) Nevertheless, that still does not answer the question is it still ethical to hunt and kill an animal for food?