Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of Social Justice
Importance of Social Justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of Social Justice
Dear Editor: I am writing to you as a student and radical protester at VPI. I always participate in the protests that we have around campus, because I believe it’s important to voice what you believe in. Unlike the other groups around campus, the ones who chose not to get involved, I am willing to make a difference. It upsets me to see how the campus and the police have treated the 107 students that participated in the sit in. These students were simply standing up for their beliefs. We should be more focused on the war instead of an issue that caused no harm. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Jessica Clark
In response to a protest at the McCormick Harvester factory in Chicago where the police reportedly killed six workers, local radicals led by Albert Parsons organized a meeting at Haymarket Square in downtown Chicago. Several thousand showed up to hear the speakers. The speakers were very careful to not incite violence in the already agitated crowd. After the speeches had been given large numbers of people left, however those who remained behind would be forever remembered in our history books. An army of police descended on the crowd and gave them an order to disperse. During the confusion, an unknown person threw a bomb into the crowd of police, killing one officer. Police began to fire on the crowd; the agitated strikers retaliated with a hail of bullets as well. A riot broke out in which one worker was killed and twelve were wounded, one policeman wa...
One of the first documented incidents of the sit-ins for the civil rights movement was on February 1, 1960 in Nashville, Tennessee. Four college African-Americans sat at a lunch counter and refused to leave. During this time, blacks were not allowed to sit at certain lunch counters that were reserved for white people. These black students sat at a white lunch counter and refused to leave. This sit-in was a direct challenge to southern tradition. Trained in non-violence, the students refused to fight back and later were arrested by Nashville police. The students were drawn to activist Jim Lossen and his workshops of non-violence. The non-violent workshops were training on how to practice non-violent protests. John Lewis, Angela Butler, and Diane Nash led students to the first lunch counter sit-in. Diane Nash said, "We were scared to death because we didn't know what was going to happen." For two weeks there were no incidences with violence. This all changed on February 27, 1960, when white people started to beat the students. Nashville police did nothing to protect the black students. The students remained true to their training in non-violence and refused to fight back. When the police vans arrived, more than eighty demonstrators were arrested and summarily charged for disorderly conduct. The demonstrators knew they would be arrested. So, they planned that as soon as the first wave of demonstrators was arrested, a second wave of demonstrators would take their place. If and when the second wave of demonstrators were arrested and removed, a third would take their place. The students planned for multiple waves of demonstrators.
The Port Huron Statement, issued in 1962 by a group of reformist students, is a peaceful call to action. In addition to pointing out the wrongs in their society, it also speaks about how the institutions of schools, government, the economy, the military-industrial complex and society as a whole are broken and need to change. “Institutions and practices which stifle dissent should be abolished, and the promotion of peaceful dissent should be actively promoted.” It calls for the use of modern technology, corporations and government to eliminate the problems past generations had to suffer such as poverty and racism. Its specific recommendations speak of working within the system to reform it. At this time the Students for a Democratic Society really believed that change could be achieved through “peaceful dissent”.
my name if farah ahmedi. and i have something to say. first, i am grateful for Alyce Litz, my mother, and so many others. i am also grateful to have this time. Although i do not have very much, i am going to share this time. I want to, because this is something, that has given me and so many others the urge. an urge to stand. and walk. and create. and protest. in truth, this time will stay. It will remain with us. unless we do something now. What would say to a young girl, of 4 or 5; who is in her school uniform. braids in hair. with a wholehearted desire. a desire for knowledge. but you have to say no. because she is what she is.
War holds the approximate greatness of a black hole, and is alike one in many ways. From times immemorial writers have used imagery, language appealing to one or more of the 5 senses, irony, things that go against what is expected, and structure, the way the story is written, to protest war. This form of protest has most likely existed since any point in which the existence of both war and written language intersected, and were a part of human life. Through the use of imagery, irony and structure, writers protest war.
School cant paid if they dont have students so with the students walking out they should listen. Right when the bell rang, and teachers were about to take attendance, one student from every school who was part of the organization stood up and said “walkout!”. They did this for about a week and every time it occurred, it got worse. People were getting abused by police officers and this was all caught on camera and showed on the news. The next day people were getting tracked down and being arrested for the protest. This is when the organization of students knew they had to make a bigger stand even though it was gonna take a huge risk. Instead of only students walking out, they got Parents, workers, cousins, friends, to all walkout and show they’re mexican pride and that they are american citizens, that they are people and should be treated like
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. received a Nobel Prize and was honored by the President of the United States for his contributions to society. On the other hand, he was prosecuted, convicted, incarcerated, and had his sentence reaffirmed by the Supreme Court. These explanations seem rather contradictory. If what he did was noble, why was he jailed for his actions? When we take into account these manifestations of the government's attitude towards Martin Luther King, we can safely make the assumption that the government is not always justified in the laws that it creates. Our government's original purpose was to keep order and ensure freedom to its people. As history has shown us, as in the case of African Americans, the government will expand its role and take away liberties of the few. The individual is justified in acting out in civil disobedience when the government restricts the liberties of the individual.
“...we ask that Mr. Wilson cease working to violate the civil rights of the students he is supposed to be representing.”
Civil disobedience has been around for a long time. In Bible times Christians would disobey laws that would go against their beliefs, such as the law that they couldn’t preach. (Acts 4) Christians still disobey laws in many countries that do not let them practice their faith, some end up in jail or killed.
By definition, civil disobedience means to actively refuse to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of a government or of an occupying power without resorting to physical violence (Wikipedia 2007). Many of the influential people in history have felt passionately about what they believe. These passions caused them to rebel against a government or authority. Many times they felt so strongly about what they believed and how they were being treated was wrong they became disobedient. They would take physical and verbal abuse for being disobedient but would never retaliate. They believed in what they thought was wrong and tried to change the way they were governed. Albert Einstein once said 'never do anything against conscience even if the state demands it.' Albert Einstein's views seem to be reasonable. The claim by Albert Einstein is accurate because people should stand up for what they believe, they should know when they are right and their government is wrong, and they should trust in themselves and their own beliefs.
Xenakis, S. (2012). A new dawn? change and continuity in political violence in greece. Terrorism and Political Violence, 24(3), 437-464. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2011.633133
This paper focuses on the protests in Ukraine and seeks to examine the different aspects related to its effect on Ukraine’s relations with the international community. This paper also discusses the role of other political leaders inside Ukraine on the protests and some of the key actors involved. The approach used to write this paper is realistic. Ukraine’s self-interest combined with the economic and military power of Russia is the possible reason of the decision made by Ukraine. As this case basically deals with power and self-interests of countries, realism will best help to understand and comprehend this case.
place during the fall and spring semesters (“Campus Unrest” 1). These events were large discussions held on college campuses where students, faculty and administration met to openly learn about and discuss issues relating to the war. Teach-ins were efforts for Americans in relation to universities to voice their opinions and get the attention of government officials with the prayer that United States involvement in the war would not continue to increase at such a rapid rate. They stressed the importance of peace, not violence. Such teach-ins first took place in March of 1965 at the University of Michigan. This set a precedent for other colleges and universities as these rallies began to take place more and more frequently (“Campus Unrest 1).
The G20 Summit’s that have taken place all over the world and each stop along the way has yielded some form of protest. The one that hits closest to home for Canadians is the G20 Summit that took place in Toronto, Ontario, on June 26-27, 2010. Protests were bound to happen in Toronto and the government believed they were prepared, police did what they felt was necessary, and the public has their own opinion of what went on during those summer days in 2010. People on each side of this conflict were going to be unhappy regardless of the outcome, and just like death and taxes, that was a guarantee. The G20 Summit’s that took place in Toronto were doomed right from the get go. According to a Maclean’s article from 2010, the Canadian Government spent upwards of $900
having a car or even renting an apartment. Not only were these students being treated as