Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The implication of change in organization
Organizational change, reflection paper
Effective management strategies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The implication of change in organization
The companies continued acquisitions at the firm ignored the standards of conflicts between competing accounts. There was little direction on how each acquired account would fit into the company’s original structures which also disabled its core beliefs of winning and ingenuity. (Finkelstein, 2003, p.90-91).
II. First who…Then What “The executives who ignited the transformations from good to great did not first figure out where to drive the bus and then get people to take it there” (Collins, 2001,p.41). The company grew so large they lost control. There were not enough support systems in place to support the growth at the fast pace. The vision of the company that it should continue to grow remained in sight by only acquiring other companies.
…show more content…
To begin implementation of this plan, the company will begin to search for a Quality Assurance manager. The sole responsibility of the manager will be to confirm that QA testing has been completed on all batches of dairy products that are going to be shipped. The Antecedent of poor leadership in quality assurance was paired with an extreme consequence, so the new QA manager will need to be extremely qualified with a full background that includes risk management assessment. Goal statements, safety posters, and past events will all be included in their orientation of the company to bring them up to date on current situation of the organization (Bracksick, 2007, p.45). The behavior patterns of weekly meetings and correction of errors in an immediate manner will be discussed as well in the hiring process. The manager will also be responsible with consulting on new testing procedures and decreasing the testing time. They will work closely with the R & D team. Once the manager is in place, they will assist in the hiring of the assistant manager to help evaluate “behaviors correlated with business results” (Bracksick, 2007, p.45). The assistant manager will be solely responsible for a lot of the FDA regulations and paperwork along with the administrative assistant. They will be responsible for staying up to date on all policies. The new quality assurance representatives will work as a support system for the manager and assistant manager in all aspects. Their jobs will encompass all aspects of inspecting, paperwork, implementing QA policies, among other various tasks. As the work load increases, the number of QA representatives can increase as well. Once the QA department is in place, a Research and Development sector needs to be put in place on a temporary basis for now. They are to create new testing procedures to ensure the quality and process of dairy production is up to code and under at least a two hour period of time (this is the amount of time it takes to
The second part, “Why It Happened: Eighty-Five Years,” explains the origins of the firm and its founding and operating principles, and it sets the basics for why several deviations from these founding principles eventually led the firm astray.
Conclusion In my opinion, the failure of the mergers and acquisitions depends on the culture and operational difference between the two firms.
In preparation to negotiate a merger between AAA HotelCo and Lambert Hotels, my team and I determined that both party’s interests complemented one another. For example, Lambert desired a presence in Brazil and AAA wished to gain access to the lucrative tourist market in the United States. Therefore, we were confident we could strike a deal and achieve these interests. However, due to the significant risks associated with the investment, both parties had several issues they wanted to settle in their favor. As a result, my team and I determined not only AAA’s principal interests, but also our secondary interests, so that we could successfully negotiate a win-win with Lambert. Despite our confidence in striking an integrative negotiation, we next determined our BATNA; AAA HotelCo would not merge with Lambert Hotels, but instead purchase a U.S.-based franchise, Excellent Hotels. Then, accounting for each issue, my team and I determined our reservation point as 300, our target point as 500, and our aspiration point as 750. Next, as suggested by the case, we decided to make an aggressive f...
At a macro level as a result of the acquisition the combined size of Turner & Townsend Thinc was considered to be of strategic benefit to both firms. While there have been no official mass redundancies, role duplication has resulted in early retirement and resignations. However, the common problem faced after the acquisition is power struggles, excessive overhead, bureaucracy, uncontrolled layering, and decision strangulation.
Gaughan, P. A., 2002. Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate restructuring. 3rd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mergers and acquisitions transpire because in tough eras, firms yearn to benefit by buying new technologies, operatives reductions, grasping economies of scale quicker, and enhanced marketplace grasp and industry visibility. This is the immaculate scenario for a coalition, but many a times it’s the opposite case. Such synergy might just be in the minds of the heads of the two firms, and might or might not craft an enhanced value....
The New England Wire and Cable (NEWC) present a situation that was quite possibly very common amongst many towns and smaller cities in the United States during the mid-1980s to the early 1990s. As large corporations with new technology swept across the country, small town American and its legacy manufactures and companies struggled to keep pace. This case study references the New England Wire and Cable Company that in some ways was resistant to change. John P. Kotter’s article, Why Transformation Efforts Fail, outlines eight classic errors that are made in the transformation process. Likewise, Kotter’s article also outlines eight steps that could spearhead transformation within an organization. There was clearly a commonly hidden problem within the NEWC the so many times goes unseen. That problem was the leadership of NEWC.
The soft factors can make or break a successful change process, since new structures and strategies are difficult to build upon inappropriate cultures and values. These problems often come up in the dissatisfying results of spectacular mega-mergers. The lack of success and synergies in such mergers is often based in a clash of completely different cultures, values, and styles, which make it difficult to establish effective common systems and structuresBased on the case study, extensive research and annual reports of AT&T the writer has mapped AT&T in the different domains. AT&T should strive to attain a perfect circle as close to the centre as possible, which indicates total synergy, order and equilibrium. Where the circle is skewed drastic change is needed as it moves closer to the outer ring of chaos:
establish best practice for operational processes to align with the department/division mission, vision and objectives.
Another case that exemplifies a lack of Leavitt’s Diamond’s fundamental principles is Kmart’s acquisition of Borders. In this case, Kmart wished to integrate Borders with their existing bookstore chain Waldenbrooks. Although the goal of both companies was similar, Kmart made the assumption that the people would be akin as well. This proved to be a false assumption, which led to the their end several years later—another example of a failed system, due to a lack of attention to Leavitt’s Diamond. In direct contrast to these cases, the few successful mergers happen only after properly viewing the impact on all areas of the organization. Some of the strongest examples of this are Disney’s various acquisitions of Marvel, Fox, and Lucasfilm. Throughout these sequential acquisitions, Disney’s stock has grown from $16.340, to $111.620. In addition, their net worth has increased by 32.67 billion dollars. In the case of all of these acquisitions, the various entertainment companies’ shared similar goals, yet had various differences in other areas of tasks, as well as differences in people and structure. With proper changes made to each area; however, Disney ensured successful mergers in every instance. One important aspect to note is that Disney’s initial plan for the acquisitions included the change to structure. Because decisions had been made prior to the transition, the company lost no recourses trying to
Companies merge and acquire other companies for a lot of strategic reasons with different degree of success. The success of a merger is measured by whether the value of the acquiring firm is enhanced by it. The impact of mergers and acquisitions on organization can be small and big in other cases.
Kotter, J. P. (2007). ‘Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail’. Harvard Business Review, January: 96-103.
Mergers and acquisitions immediately impact organizations with changes in ownership, in ideology, and eventually, in practice. There are multiple reasons, motives, economic forces and institutional factors that can, taken together or in isolation, influence corporate decisions to engage in mergers or acquisitions. The financial risks of merging with or acquiring an organization in another country and how those risks can be mitigated are important issues for corporations to conduct research on. This paper will examine the sensible and dubious reasons for mergers and acquisitions and the benefits and costs of the cash and stock transactions.
Quality is a word which has been used for a very long time, lots of books have been written about it, and many of the world scientists have defined it in many different ways. In this research paper, I will emphasis on the Quality Management System, why is it important? What is it used for? What is the importance of having a Quality Management System? Many people think implementing QMS costs a lot and all the benefit is a piece of a paper which say that your company is certified in having QMS so you can only hang this picture or certificate on the wall and tell your smart customer that you have it. In fact, no blames on them, they have not used this system yet, they do not know that this system save a lot and a lot of money for companies. They do not know that this system create a dynamic motion within the companies so everyone know what he/she is doing, everybody understands his/her role, and everyone can feel being an important part of the process then everybody can work towards a clear and unified target. However, having a lot of benefits requires a reasonable cost and in the same time it worth. There are several organization which are concerned and involved in this issue, those organizations have produced a unified standards and those standards have its requirements. The International Standardization Organization which located in Switzerland which have a contribution of 157 countries have produced a standard which is concerned about the QMS.
Introduction Effectively integrating information technology (IT) into an organization’s business processes is critical if the organization wants to increase productivity and remain profitable. IT includes items such as the systems software, application software, computer hardware, and the networks and databases that help manage the organization’s information. When implementing quality standards and processes that are forever changing in the IT world, organizations must balance these changes while continuing to rapidly implement new systems technologies in order to stay competitive. Quality improvements in IT delivery and service support can be improved by measuring and tracking user satisfaction, integration and flexibility early on in the decision process and reinforcing them throughout the review process. Adhering to quality management best practices means ensuring that quality standards are strictly enforced and entrenched into the organization’s philosophy.