Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefit of project management
Benefit of project management
Benefit of project management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefit of project management
Introduction Achieving the anticipated outcome of cost, time, and quality are traditionally what determines the success or failure of a project (Chipulu et al., 2014). Project success is dependent on the support of senior management, but their involvement in projects and understanding of project management methodologies is perceived to be inadequate by project managers (Ancosky, 2013) or lack of proper governance makes them ineffective (Young & Poon, 2013). Existing research has already identified certain gaps in understanding the important role senior manager’s play in project success (Ancosky, 2013). The Project Management Institute (2016) in their annual report “The High Cost of Low Performance” identified a difference in the perception of project management between executive leaders and PMO directors. Young & Poon (2013) reported there is a …show more content…
Frequent changes in a project by senior management, rather than involved support by senior managers, contributes significantly toward project failure (Hickson, 2015). Understanding the benefits of project management by those in senior management positions, who are acting as sponsors and leaders, is also vital to project success (Hickson, 2015). The project management methodologies initiated by senior managers often fail to favorably influence project success (Ancosky, 2013). Even when project management methodologies are used, they provide little benefit without proper governance (Young & Poon, 2013). Research has also demonstrated that senior managers play an important role in the success of projects (Ancosky, 2013; Hickson, 2015; Young & Poon, 2013). Senior managers should know more than just the benefits of project management methodologies, they must understand project management concepts and how to leverage these concepts within the organization (Ancosky,
These project managers are also examining teamwork for ways to improve project success. However, since the benefits of leadership behaviors can be rather intangible, this has slowed or prevented the implementation of leadership theories. Accordingly, the impact of leadership behaviors on project performance has been one of the major issues for both industry and academic fields (Keller, 1992; Kendra and Taplin, 2004; Turner and Muller, 2005). In order to understand the benefits, there is a need for quantification of the benefits derived from leadership behaviors. Research on leadership behaviors and theirs associations with project success should offer tangible evidence of advantages from adopting a certain leadership style (Giritli and Civan, 2008). There is a need for more comprehensive empirical evidence that evaluates the benefits associated with the project manager's leadership style and, more specifically, its associations with project success. This study attempts to fill this void of empirical evidence by identifying the associations between leadership style and project success. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of the leadership style on project success and to examine the mediating role of Team stability in the relationship between leadership performance and project success. In other words, the analysis shows the relationship between
Action #1: Training in project management. As stated in the case, these organizations were at different levels of project management maturity, including two of them that were “clueless” about project management. As their goal was to implement an enterprise project management methodology, training in project management represent the first step in this endeavor. It will also help them to create a general and common understanding of what project management is and how it should be implemented, as the other tow companies that knew and implemented project management, exert their implementation in a different way.
Söderlund, J. 2004. Building theories of project management: past research, questions for the future.International Journal of Project Management, 22 (3), pp. 183-191.
Graham, R. J. & Randall, L., Creating an Environment for Successful Projects: The Quests to Manage Project Management, second ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 65-113, 2003.
Projects are widely used by many organizations and government institutions in the course of conducting their business. One of the reasons for this is because they have been proven to be effective in initiating change and translating strategic programs into daily activities. However, it has been established that most projects fail to deliver on time, budget, and customer specifications. In most cases, this failure is caused by over-optimism by the project management team. This over-optimism commonly referred to as optimism bias can simply be defined as overestimating the projects benefits and conversely underestimating its cost and duration time. Research have portrayed that this is often caused by failure to properly identify, understand, and manage effectively the risk associated with the project therefore putting its success at jeopardy(Mott McDonald, 2002). Fortunately, this biasness can be detected and minimized during the project gateway process.
Project quality management is defined as ensuring that a project will satisfy the requirements that it is initially intended to have. This means that not only meeting written requirements for scope, time and cost is needed in a project management, but it also must meet the specified and implied needs from a stakeholder(s) and this is where project quality management comes into play (Schwalbe, 2015, pg. 302). Project quality management purpose is to know how quality of a project will be managed during the development of the project and this is done in part by communicating the overall quality practices by the team project members. Project quality management contains three
Project managers must possess the ability to use sound judgment based on the facts available to them, past experiences, and knowledge of current events to make effective decisions. Often, the success of project managers is based upon the outcomes of the decisions they did or did not make. As such, conducting performance assessments, during project implementation and after project completion, enables project managers and project stakeholders to accurately evaluate the success of the project. Projects are innately complex and multifaceted; therefore, project successes are difficult to measure and ascertain. “Based on an extensive review of the project success literature … a clear definition of project success does not exist and there is a need to develop meaningful and measurable constructs of project success” (Mir & Pinnington, 2014, p. 203).
Functional, Matrix, and Dedicated Team Approaches to Managing Projects. These team approaches have all different set of advantages and disadvantages to them. The major difference between the three is that the functional team approach is “employed” totally from within the parent organization. Functional approaches have absolutely no cost to them and provide more than adequate flexibility in the use of staff.
What is your general experience of project management performance in your organization? What are typical reasons for low performance in project management?
In the globalized economy, Successful project managers are in much demand across many industries. Organizations strongly need experienced project managers to lead their staff to accomplish their business goals and deliver successful projects. In an increasingly complex environment, project managers need to turn into many roles and have all kinds of responsibilities at each level of management within an organization. Good project managers are not born. They need to be trained. They develop their skills through study, practise and experience. They become better project managers after they finish a successful project each time. They learn new techniques and apply them on their projects. They learn their lessons from failed projects and then improve to be better project managers in the future.
Turner, J. R., & Müller, R. (2005). The project manager's leadership style as a success factor on projects: a literature review.
Over the course of my professional life, I have become increasingly involved in project management roles. Doing so has made me aware of the many varied challenges that can face projects and the project managers who are charged with bringing them through to completion. The success or failure of projects, in whatever economic, political or social field, rests not just on the quality of the project’s goals, but also on the abilities of those involved in the project – and above all those who are managing it – to bring it to successful completion. To do this, project managers need to be equipped with a very wide range of skills, many of which are unrelated to the type of project itself. So, for example, a project manager of an engineering project must not only have engineering
People in top management positions, is a key stakeholders in projects success. Top management can help project managers secure adequate resources, get approval for unique project needs in a timely manner, receive cooperation from people throughout the organization, and learn how to be better leaders. The reason why project success come from the project managers, but there are other important factor that make the project success such as takes careful planning, attention to detail and effective communication.
Project management creates a situation where the workers perform their duties and responsibilities in a structural and devoted manner. With much dedication and focus it is possible to use fewer workers to accomplish and execute a project. Allowing fewer workers to perform a project allows frees up possible persons to work other tasks. The increased efficiency of teams in their tasks is of a consequent meaning that the effectiveness of the organization as whole is increased as well (Larson, 2014). Doing this allows project management the ability to hold people accountable and this makes the workers much more efficient in their tasks than a slew of
Westerveld, E., The Project Excellence Model®: linking success criteria and critical success factors, International Journal of Project Management, Volume 21, Issue 6, August 2003, Pages 411-418. Science Direct [Accessed 10th February 2014]