Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A short note on self improvement
A short note on self improvement
A short note on self improvement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A short note on self improvement
Should people strive to better themselves? Or should people learn to appreciate the things they have and who they are. This essay is about why I beleive that people should strive to better themselves, as well as considering the things they have and the person they are already. As well as presenting my personal opinion, this essay will explain why striving to better yourself is superior to merely learning to appreciate the things you have and who you are.
You should better yourself because every person in life should at least try to better something about themselves. No one in the world can ever be perfect but not being perfect does not stop you from bettering yourself. "As long as a person doesn’t wish to be transformed into someone else, but rather refine certain pieces of themselves, then they will transcend the average. So give it all you’ve got, dream big, take risks, and cherish every moment as you advance and mature into a better you"(1). Everyone has some type of issue holding them back, whether it is an anger issue, an anxiety, a phobia, etc. You should always try to do your best to improve upon your issues which will make you a better person. Not only is it good for you, but it can also be good for others and it can help you further along down the road in life.
While you should strive to better yourself, you must also appreciate the thing you have as well. Bettering yourself does not mean that you either want more or are “greedy”. You need to appreciate everything you have in life. If you don’t then you are considered greedy, and no one wants to truly be greedy. But you can appreciate everything you have and still better yourself. You should appreciate yourself, your family, and your property. That appreciation is what b...
... middle of paper ...
... the things you have is definitely beneficial because it makes you not so greedy and/or not wanting more, or needing more.I would like to share my views on the topic at hand.In my opinion people should accept who they are and not try to change. I do believe that they should strive to better themselves but only in physical ways Appreciating who you are is an important thing not only for yourself but as well as for others and your daily life.
1. http://gwa4gnusblog.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/is-it-better-for-people-to-accept-who-they-are-and-what-they-have-or-should-people-always-strive-to-better-themselves/
2. http://www.essayforum.com/writing-feedback-3/sat-essay-strive-better-themselves-accept-they-have-39177/
3.http://www.bubblews.com/news/2401995-is-it-best-for-people-to-accept-who-they-are-and-what-they-have-or-should-people-always-strive-to-better-themselves
...ness. We should just “love our life, poor as it is” as poor people would yield “the most sugar and the most starch.” Therefore, we should be unique and should never care about money in this material world.
The Hunger Games was a critically acclaimed movie when it came out; however, some critics would argue that the movie can be sometimes too violent for its intended audience. In this essay I would dissert Brian Bethune’s essay “Dystopia Now” in order to find its weaknesses and compare the movie Battle Royale with his essay.
... these things are reached while being true to oneself, they can increase the feeling of self worth and cause better appreciation of human values.
Some people think that states that allow citizens to carry guns only raises the crime rate in that state. Studies have actually shown that states that allow citizens to carry guns actually have a lower crime rate. States that allow citizens to carry guns have actually shown to lower murder rates from 5.6 killings per 100,000 people to 4.2.
The death penalty has many supporters and opposes and i would have to say i am one of the opposes because whether they did or didn 't comment the crime . I don 't think it gives us as the people of the united states the right to kill a Man or Woman that does the horrific Crime . I mean don 't get wrong i am a true believer that everyone person is responsible for their actions and that justice needs to be taken. I believe most people think that if they get justice for their loved ones it would solve everything it may for the few minutes. But killing a person for their crime is just not justice Its just revenge for the families they harmed.
“Be content with what you have; rejoice in the way things are. When you realize there is nothing lacking, the whole world belongs to you.” - Laozi
There were many good points made during the debates that went on during Thursday, Friday and Monday. One of the debates was about the controversial topic: the Second Amendment. One of the groups was trying to argue that the Second Amendment should not be changed because it is part of the Constitution. The other side was trying to argue that the if there was more gun control, the gun violence will go down. Both sides on this issue made good points, but one of the groups won this debate. The side that was pro second amendment made more good points than the side of the group that was opposed to the Second Amendment. One good point that stood out at me was the fact that there were 9,000 gun deaths in the United States in the last year, but there
One of the most controversial topics today is gun control. In the month of November, 2016, voters will vote for the issue of Gun and ammunition control. Pro and anti-gun supporters have very different opinions on the issue of guns. Gun and anti-gun control laws are extremely controversial in today’s society. Supporters and non-supporters are debating whether guns should be illegal or not. Two writers from “Armed with Reason”, Evan Defilippis and Devin Hughes are opposed to gun control laws and on the other hand, author Phoebe Malts Bovy from New Republic is pro-gun control laws.
Trade-offs often occur when the members of a system are competing with each other. It is one of the most prevailing acknowledgements for coexistence in the communities. The ‘Darwinian demon’ theory indicated that “Trade-offs between survival and reproduction, however, constraints any organism from realistically resembling that creature.” Similarly, ‘Hutchinson demon’ theory also pinpointed whereby “one species in a community dominates because it is best colonizing new patches, utilizing all the resources, avoiding predators and resisting stresses.” Trade-offs in a community can be controlled by several limiting factors, such as scarce of resources, abiotic factors like pH, salinity, presence of sunlight, and presence of competitors. Interspecific trade-offs are typically thought to be a requirement for species coexistence in communities at small spatial scales. Within meta-community context, trade-offs are still often harbingered as imperative for coexistence at a regional scale rather than local scale. There are three elements of trade-offs among competing species within a trophic level like the interaction between local and regional trade-offs, regional-scale coexistence and trade-offs and species diversity at multiple spatial scales (alpha, beta, gamma).
Until now, the issue of the death penalty remains being debated. Texas leads in the number of executions since 1976 in the United States (TDCJ). To date, Texas has executed 525 offenders and there are still criminals on the list waiting to be executed (TDCJ). There are pros and cons of the death penalty. I will explain those as well as some insight into other reasons why the death penalty should be abolished.
“You make the world a better place by making yourself a better person,” was once said by a man named Scott Sorrell. In today’s modern world and age, everything seems to be progressing and getting larger at a mind blowing rate. This includes people’s attitudes on themselves, on other people, and on the world in general. Many people are insecure and spiteful towards their physique or their overall worth, and bitter and disconnected from other people. Scott Sorrell’s quote is conveying that one can make the world a better place both for themselves and for other people simply by changing their attitude and being positive. I agree with Scott Sorrell’s quote because by choosing to be happy from within, people’s positive attitudes can reach other people and eventually the world, making it a “better place”.
The fact of going back to school means much for kids as they are excited of seeing again their friends, looking forward to have new experiences and it is also mean the resumption of homework which children have to do at home in the evening with great dismay for some of them, surrounded by their parents who try to help as much as they can. The pertinence of homework makes a general consensus even if kids don’t always agree with the way of giving them. After questioning some children under the age of 10, 3rd and 4th graders, I always obtain the same type of answer as the following: “It is quite demanding, it always is more difficult than what we did in class, it is not as easy
..., a person who earns $25,000 is happier than a person who makes $125,000 and an employee who makes $500,000 is only slightly happier than someone who makes $55,000. Lastly, there are more important things in life that and make you happy, for example, friends. They don’t come with a price tag, and if they do, you definitely need new friends. Money won’t make you happy since good times can’t be bought. You don’t need a fancy vacation to have a good time; it’s just a matter of who you spend it with. Over the years, humans have blown the value of money way out of proportion. People make it seem like if you’re not filthy rich, then you won’t live a good life but it’s not true. You can lack money and yet still live a perfect, happy life.
Upon reading the essay prompt, I took a few moments to introspect. I thought back to every experience that helped mold me into the person I am today. As human beings, we are influenced by many aspects of our surroundings. Even as children, we develop certain attributes through observation, or through conditioning by our parents. These attributes may not be always positive, but the combination of both positive and negative qualities form the people we are today. No one is perfect; nevertheless, some are fortunate enough to have their strengths outweigh their weaknesses. I believe I am one of those lucky people.
So who exactly needs self-improvement? Is it for a specific type of person? Is it for a group of people? Like adults? Or teens? Or even Children?. Is it for the rich or the poor? Self-improvement is needed in everyone. It does not matter who you are, or what you look like, or the background you come from. We all need Self- improvement.To all of us, Self improvement is needed in our daily lives just like we need food and water. It feeds us with understanding, knowledge, character, and wisdom. Coming from experience, I never thought I needed Self-improvement.I thought I was fine and did not need any adjustment in myself. I thought I was a good person with very good qualities, but I was wrong. You can say that one day, I made a tremendous mistake that lead to a regret but it was the wake-up call for me. Long story short, I thought that I did not need to eat and I use to starve myself but because I did that, I had a major blackout which put me in the hospital and almost died. How I said before, it comes from experienc...