Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Phantom of the opera analysis
Phantom of the opera analysis
Phantom of the opera analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Phantom of the opera analysis
I must begin by saying that this musical has been one of the most consistently influential pieces of art throughout my entire life. I knew I loved it, I knew I loved the music from the very first time I heard the Broadway soundtrack. Until now, I had no idea that I could analyze nearly every element of this play in a way that would musically explain why I loved it so much from a logical standpoint. To begin, it must be said that Phantom of the Opera (and by association, Andrew Lloyd Webber as well as the entire genre of Broadway musicals) is famous for its subtle, yet powerful repetition, as well as motivic development. Halfway through the musical, patterns and snippets come back from earlier songs in new and interesting ways. For example, in the ending of the song “Prima Donna,” one of the most used motifs in the musical comes back as the Phantom declares war on the Opéra Populaire. This motif, five chromatic notes that are played descending and then ascending repeatedly in a ghostly manner, are heard in nearly every song as a coherent, connecting device. It’s incredibly subtle, as …show more content…
In Prima Donna’s second verse, four different melodies are sung at once, verbally showcasing the unrest of the scene as well as the differing opinions of those on the stage. This contrapuntal texture is used on purpose to convey the confusion and conflict of that scene. This occurs at many other places in the musical, such as the very end in “Down Once More,” where the Phantom, Christine, and Raoul all sing at once, again, showcasing the tension of the scene. To add, Christine’s lyrics and melody are developments of a preceding song “Angel of Music,” while the Phantom’s are quite similar to “Past the Point of No Return.” All in all, audience members can clearly see how closely related the songs are in this musical, and the reasons why Webber used as much polyphony as he
My least favorite aspect of this play was the ending. The ending confused me and was anticlimactic. It was not funny and not entertaining at all.
It was good setting to get the attention from the audience and also a way to move around or change settings of the play. Although I love this play my small critic for this play was the players. Some others actors had understandable accents but others didn’t. For example, the brother of the servant his accent was confusing because he kept switching his accent from different country languages. This play was really nice it had a little of bit of everything drama, comedy, romance, betrayal. What like about this play it was how they used the dramatic structure the inciting incident and the climax. The inciting incident for this play of musical comedy murders of 1940 was guessing who the killer of the play was because there was tension building up not knowing who the murder was. The climax for this play would be for me finding out who was the murder and just being in shock how everything had change into a new scenario. Overall it was amazing show how it developed and how well an organized transition the play
Sondheim’s music is well-appreciated by many people of all ages. He has won eight Tony’s, more than any other composer. Sondheim sculpted the musicality of musical theatre into what it is today by
In conclusion, this production was one of my favorites that I had ever seen. The storyline was interesting and intense throughout. The designers and actors brought the message across perfectly, which made the play a great success. There were a lot of messages portrayed in this play; however, I believe the most important would be the need for justice. It is important to give the people a fair trial and that it is dangerous to be stereotypical in life.
because it made me became very curious about what is going to happen next. The play’s beginning was no as interesting as the movie’s. I also liked the acting in the movie.
The Glass Menagerie is a play written by Tennessee Williams. It involves a mother, Amanda, and her two children, Tom and Laura. They are faced with many problems throughout the play. Some of these problems involve: Amanda, the mother, only wants to see her kids succeed and do well for themselves. How does her drive for success lead the book?
One of its numerous strengths was the costuming and set. This musical would not have been the same had these elements not come together to transport the viewer. In addition to the costuming and the set, the actors were very well cast. Each actor was in a role that fit them and they portrayed their characters very well. For example, the man who played Glen really seemed like a greedy Wall Street worker. The choreography was also well done. It fit true to the style of dance in the 1980s and added to the immersion experience. The only thing that could have made this experience better would be to add more music. This may just be a personal preference, but when I see a musical I like for the music to be central like it is in Hamilton or Les Miserables. However, this musical was very good and not much could be added to enhance the
The element that stood out the most to me was how effectively the music and the footwork corresponded. The best examples of this are seen through the dancers solos. Especially Albrecht's solo, his feet glide on the stage at the same tempo as the music. Similarly, Giselle's graceful footwork is truly amazing. I really like the similarities between the choreographed footwork and the music, it makes Giselle seem much more elegant and beautiful. This also seems to make the work look more put together and in sync because the dancers are dancing in harmony with the orchestra. The choreography by itself is amazing. The footwork is rapid and intricate, however, at the same time it is delicate and graceful. The ballerina (Giselle) made it look very easy to do the choreography, when it rea...
Love can make people commit violent acts that they would normally not consider. The Phantom of the Opera is a novel written by Gaston Leroux, which combines love and violence to explore relationships between men and women whose personal experiences of love are vastly different. It is about a man named Erik, also known as The Phantom of the Opera. He has a devil’s appearance and angel’s voice. His shameful face made his parents hate and ignore him. They made him wear a mask to hide his face and keep him away. Erik feels he is separate from society, Erik feels strong sense of inferiority, choosing to close his heart and live alone in the darkness.
It is a joyful yet slow song. When the musical brings you up with large scale jazz pieces and comedy, this song brings you back down and comforts you. Only sung twice, this song appears near both the beginning and end of the show, highlighting its importance. To me, this song highlighted the innocence at the heart of the musical. When it first appears, it is sung by hopeful soldiers yearning to go home. The second, and last time, it appears as a resolution to the issues of the musical. Throughout the plot, the characters are littered with desire, miscommunication, and often confusion. But after they are all together and safe, it begins to snow despite all forecast. They proceed to due the only reasonable thing to do in this beautiful moment, sing. This song represents both the beginning and end by way of the context in which it is sung, as well as highlighting to the audience what this show is really all
Throughout the second and final act the musical content within the play acts as a story of it’s own through theme and variation. Each separate song represents a feeling and or mood and is enhanced as it is varied throughout the act. Like the first act, the songs are used to portray poverty, suffering, hardships, and even death. However, unlike the first act, there is also a theme of love and happiness. Closure is brought about with a sense of warmth and this is often heard through the display of the tempo. When the times were tough the tempo decreased and was often slow and morbid like.
As every scene went by, my mind was blown little by little. By the end of the play my brain was loaded with an adrenalin, oxytocin and dopamine cocktail that only a masterpiece is capable of summoning. I felt, I heard, I breathed, I tasted and I saw “Our Country is Good.”
As said in Wicked, “I don’t know if I’ve been changed for the better, but because I knew you I have been changed for good.” This quote is true for me and many other people who have discovered comfort in Broadway Theatre. I polled a facebook group what their favorite Broadway show was out of Wicked, Phanton of the Opera, Hamilton, and Dear Evan Hansen to see what the two most popular shows are. A total of fifty people answered and Wicked came out on top with nineteen votes and Phantom of the Opera came in second with fourteen votes. Broadway is a popular genre that many people enjoy and Broadway has opened many musicals and plays. In my speech, I will be discussing a short history of Broadway and then the shows Wicked and Phantom of the Opera. Now as the show begins, please turn off cell-phones, thank you and enjoy the show!
I can now understand why you were so shocked when you discovered almost nobody had seen this show. I understand how and why it is one of the more commonly known plays. This was an overall great show. Although it was a super long show with many scenes I didn’t feel were needed, I loved it all, especially the singing and the choreography The props were very well thought out and I loved the unexpected scenes of events towards the end. This show was all around a lot of fun to watch.
When I was first watching it, I didn’t particularly love it because I was comparing it to the last performance that I had seen. The actors were different, the songs were being sung differently, and frankly I was just not enjoying it. But as the musical went on, my perspective changed and I quickly realized that while everything was different, everything was so right. I began to enjoy and appreciate the new actors take on their characters. I once again came away thinking this was my favorite musical ever. I’m very happy that I was provided the chance to yet again to see my favorite