Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personal essay on perseverance
Personal essay on perseverance
Personal essay on perseverance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Personal essay on perseverance
minors but struggled, every time he made a mistake, he wasn’t able to work himself out of it. He viewed himself as a failure. Fixed learning individuals are afraid of effort; they would rather be right than look wrong and judged, they try to hide their deficiencies. (Dweck, 2007). They believe that if you have to work at it. Then it just wasn’t meant to be. They feel that if you have to work at something, you must not be good at it. Things come easily! (Dweck, 2006). Relationships show signs of a person’s mindset. Being loved is one thing, being broken up with is another thing. How you handle it and what you think, determines what mindset you are in. When people have the fixed mindset, they feel judged and labeled by the rejection; they feel unlovable, permanently labeled (Dweck, 2006, p. 145). Instead of healing from the break up they lash out. “Revenge is sweet.” They are unable to heal from the experience. To take the idea of being judged a step further, bullies have a big dose of the fixed mindsets. “Bullies are the judges. They feel that some people are superior and some are inferior” (Dweck, 2006. p. 166). Bullies may not have a low self-esteem or they may. Sheri Levy’s study on how boys act and why they act that way, showed that they get a boost of self-esteem, a rush when they pick on someone else. She also found that bullies gain a social status by their actions. Think of the Columbine shooter, he was judged continuously because of the way he looked: chest deformity, short and was a computer geek. Being of the fixed mindset, he used the impulse to feel bad and lashed out his bitterness. He sought revenge (Dweck, 2006). A child as a learner with a fixed mindset has the notion that his intelli... ... middle of paper ... ...cally fit man. He was known for his HUGE appetite and big belly hanging out of his uniform. But he was determined (like Muhammad and Jordan) to put in the hours of PRACTICE and hard work to make himself a better player. All three of these famous sport idols (there were more of course) showed that that they had the growth mindset. They understood that it takes time, effort and determination to achieve their goals! They had to practice to get better. They had to put in their time of hours of hours of practice to become who they are today. They had the character, the heart, the will and the Mind of a Champion. They were champions because they had the growth mindset. They saw setbacks as motivating, to try their best, by learning and improving. They took charge of their processes that bring success and learned how to maintain them. (Dweck, 2006, p. 98-100).
In Carol Dweck’s article titled, “Brainology” Dweck discusses the different mindsets that students have about intelligence. Some where taught that each person had a set amount of intelligence, while others were trained that intelligence is something they could develop and increase over time. in Dweck’s article she writes, “ It is a belief that intelligence can be developed that opens students to a love of learning, a belief in the power of effort and constrictive, determined reactions to setbacks” (Dweck pg. 2). Dweck is talking about a growth mind-set in which is how students perceive the growth of knowledge and that no one person is born with a certain amount of intelligence, it too can be trained and developed over time. By introducing Dweck’s ideas of a growth mind-set to students, students will enjoy learning and be less devastated by setbacks, because they know they can develop intelligence. Dweck also writes that students with a growth mind-set, “believe that intelligence is something that can be cultivated through effort and education. They
love for competition helped him become a leader on the football field as well as
In The article “Brainology” “Carol S Dweck, a professor of psychology at Stanford University, differentiates between having a fixed and growth mindset in addition how these mindsets have a deep effect on a student’s desire to learn. Individuals who have a fixed mindset believe they are smart without putting in effort and are afraid of obstacles, lack motivation, and their focus is to appear smart.. In contrast, students with a growth mindset learn by facing obstacles and are motivated to learn. Dwecks argues that students should develop a growth mindset.
This is done through the use of a study. The research done monitored the mind-sets of several hundred students and the grades that they accomplished over time. Through this they realized that those who believed that intelligence is a skill individuals develop over time were the students who were improving in the class. To ensure that this was indeed the case they eliminated any doubt by teaching some students that intelligence is not static and proceeded to monitor their progress and discovered that their marks began to improve. This study examines the difference between using both mind-sets instead of just focusing on one and explaining why it does not work, therefore, developing the clarity needed to see the benefits of the growth mind-set. Moreover, this article not only mentions that the growth mind-set needs to be taught by teachers and learned by students, but it mentions a way in which this can easily done through the Brainology website. This is a great method especially with the increase of technology being used in the classroom. As it is has been stated, the strengths of this article are providing a study to prove the growth mind-set is beneficial and by providing means to implement the mind-set in the
Also, in Carol Dweck’s research article “Brainology”, she states the subtitle “Transforming Students’ Motivation to Learn”. She dishes mindsets and achievement, how do students learn these mindsets, and so on… … Dweck suggests, “Many students believe that intelligence is fixed, that each person has a certain amount, and that’s that. We call this a fixed mindset, and, as you will see, students with this mindset worry about how much of this fixed in intelligence they possess”. Many students believe that the challenge encountered in learning is a threat to their growth path. She put forward two different minds of the ideological study contrast, the finds showed that students studied with a growth mindset were more interested in learning and
...against the world and succeeded. They show that he could come up with new ways of coaching, new ways of playing, and new ways of thinking and still be able to set world records that still stand today.
Results of students who received praise for intelligence: The students in this category had negative results after receiving praising. When asked afterwards if they wanted to do the same level of problems or try more challenging ones, they chose the task that would allow them to look smart and do well on. Consequently, while telling a child how smart he or she is, we are sending a message to not take risks and just look the part. Afterwards, these children were given a hard task, which they performed poorly on, and they know longer liked the problems and did not want to practice them at home. Children also felt “dumb” and when given the initial task (in which they did well), they performed significantly worse. Lastly, their opinions of intelligence reflected that it was an innate capacity as though you cannot improve.
Siegler, R., & Alibali, M. (2005). Children’s Thinking Fourth Edition. Prentice Hall Inc. Upper Saddle River NJ.
During Dweck’s research, her study shows that there are two different beliefs in mind-set (self theory): fixed mind-set and growth mind-set. Dweck states that a fixed mind-set is “static trait” in other words gifted, where as growth mind-set is intelligence that could be developed throughout the years. When a student is in grade school, it is truly difficult if a teacher does not believe in her students. After designing workshops for both teachers and students, it taught the students how to use their brain in many different ways. To find the answers Dweck followed seventh graders in New York, where she monitored the grades of the students to see whether they would improve or not. In the “Mind-Sets and Equitable Education,” it states that the growth mind-set children believe in themselves, whereas fixed mind-set try to look smart and make perfection. “The Matthew Effect” plays a huge role in the growth and fixed mind-set, by the Canadian athletes having to push themselves to get a higher level and excel creating
Piaget’s theory is developed from the idea that the child constructs their knowledge individually whereas Vygotsky argued that children develop tools of learning by communicating with more knowledgeable others (O. Lourenco 2012). Piaget suggested that children develop through a series of four stages in their thinking – the sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational and formal operational stages each of which causes broad changes in the child’s intelligence structure and their logic (reference). These four structures are mental operations which are applied to anything in the child’s world these mental operations are referred to as schemas which grow and change from one stage to the next (book). Vygotsky had very different idea on this subject although they both agreed that the child is the active constructor of their own knowledge
Piaget also believed that children would only learn when they are ready. Children's use of language represents their stage in cognitive development, but he didn’t see language as a ‘central’ to children's development, as cognitive development begins at birth and is required for language development. He also states that children are egocentric – they can’t understand another person’s point of view. Criticisms of Piaget’s work = =
Before that, children were thought to have less intellectual abilities than adults. This theory models the steps children move through in thought and logical thinking, how their learning differs from adult learning, and the importance of mastering one stage before moving on to the next. The way that children grow and develop their viewpoint of life depends on their ability to form a baseline of knowledge, then question and cognitively think through how an experience differs.
The first experience (appendix 1) the practitioner was working with a group of children, the activity was reading a story from a book to which a discussion is formed. The aim of this activity was to promote the children’s thinking development. This type of thinking is from Matthew Lipman (1993) who uses a philosophical approach, it is known ‘stories of thinking,’ this can help to a...
In terms of the cognitive development perspective, Swiss Psychologist Jean Piaget, was extremely interested in how children acquire knowledge and come to understand their world and his theories form the basis of the cognitive approach (Joyce and Weil, 1996; Heo et al., 2011). Piaget asserts that “language is a product of intelligence, rather than intelligence being a product of language” (Piaget, 1929) and he explains children 's language acquisition by using four stages of cognitive development and his theories offer a crucial theoretical basis in terms of intellectual maturation (Heo et al., 2011). Piaget contends that children form schema, or cognitive structures, through which individuals
Children do not think like adults. He says that in the first 18 months of life, the child starts to explore the world and it is because of this action that he starts to understand better the world. The development of the acquisition of the language would be due only to his individual capacities. Piaget affirms that the language is a representation of the thought and in the next stages of language acquisition, just with the help of the intelligence, the child will be able to learn the first language. Moreover the environment would be a help for the acquisition of the language but not a reason for the learning. The child, between 2 and 7 years old, would become egocentric; he observes the events just from a point of view, his own, he is not so glad to communicate, but after 7 years of age this period tends to end. (Piaget, The Language and thought of the child 2002)