Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Power and its relationship to leadership
Power and its relationship to leadership
Power and its relationship to leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Power and its relationship to leadership
Influence Influence is defined as "as a force, one person exerts on someone else to induce a change in the target." (Hall, 2007). The level of influence is contingent upon the level of power and power is based on an individual’s role in the corporation. The higher the role, the more power that individual can exert and the more influential that person can become as “the person with the power has the influence” (Tardanico, 2011). There are several sources of power that leaders can exercise including legitimate, reward, coercive, expert, information, and referent ("13.3 The Power to Influence | Organizational Behavior", 2010). Leaders utilized various tactics as their means to influence others in the workplace. The different tactics that are used to achieve different objectives. The tactic chosen by the leader depends on the target ("13.3 The Power to Influence | Organizational Behavior", 2010) and on what the leader is trying to accomplish (Hall, 2007). The tactics are categorized as upward, downward and lateral. Upward, is the ability to influence your boss and others in positions higher than yours. Downward influence is the ability to influence employees lower than you, and lateral is the ability to influence colleagues at the same level (13.3 The Power to Influence | …show more content…
I tried to convince Brooke that it was a waste of time to make frequent calls to families that were behind on payment. I used the upward tactic since the communication travel from staff member to leader. My style was convincing (Tardanico, 2011) I offered logical reasons and provided proof. The reports I pulled, revealed that calling hebdomadal did not change the paying habits of our clients as they continued to pay on the 15 and the 30 of the month. I suggested that calls be made close to those dates instead. My boss agreed, and now calls are only made twice a
Meanwhile the text, online discussion, and classroom discussion helped to distinguish the differences between authority, power, and influence. In the educational venue, authority and power both involve having the authorization to compel others to comply with decisions (Gorton & Alston, 2012, p. 74, 88); whereas influence primarily involves being able to persuade or shape decisions and behavior through “informal ...
In no particular order, the first power type is called Expert power. Simply put, Expert power is a power based on the information that a leader knows, due to interacting with others who belong to familiar organizations. This type of power usually comes as the result of learning and growing within a particular role in an organization. Next, there is what is known as Referent power, which is the result of identifying with an individual or group. With Referent power, it is the outcome of the actions exhibited by a leader, that influences others to refer to him or her as an example. After Referent power is Legitimate power. Legitimate power comes from the titles, roles, or positions that people occupy (Shockley-Zalabak, 2015). For example, managers or supervisors will have Legitimate power over their subordinates due to the difference in their titles and authority levels. Following Legitimate power, there is Reward power. Reward power is when a leader or manager offers a source of tangible and intangible resources (Shockley-Zalabak, 2015). An example of Reward power is money, since it can be distributed based on one’s performance and can be a means of
“A manager manages using authority-or the right to get others to do things by virtue of their positional power. While a leader leads through the ability to influence other people to do things using a certain degree of personal power or charisma” (McLean, 2005, p. 16). By definition, leadership is about influence. Therefore, it is impossible to discuss the theme of leadership without including followers or to try to explain the idea of team building without explaining the influence of a leader. While each concept is unique, both have a direct affect on the other. A leader is not a leader without someone following him or her and a team will always develop a leader whether indirectly or directly appointed. However, leadership and team building are much like the preverbal chicken and egg; and many theories have developed over several years trying to explain the influence on each other and the successful development of teams and leaders.
Influence is one of the only factors that affect people's decisions, it gives the motivational support to those who are uncertain. It can change any current views in an instant, especially when it comes from people closest to you. The adversities of influence can be demonstrated in
Leadership is a process by which an individual influences others to accomplish a mutual objective and most scholars can agree that leadership can be defined as the nature of the influencing process. Leaders carry out this process by applying their leadership attributes, such as beliefs, values, ethics, character, knowledge, and ski...
C. Wright Mills in his article “ The Structure of Power in American Society” writes that when considering the types of power that exist in modern society there are three main types which are authority, manipulation and coercion. Coercion can be seen as the “last resort” of enforcing power. On the other hand, authority is power that is derived from voluntary action and manipulation is power that is derived unbeknownst to the people who are under that power.
Ability to influence a group of people or members of an organization towards the achievement of a set of goals is called Leadership. In an organization, not all managers are leaders, nor, all leaders are managers. In other words, leaders can emerge from within a group as well as by formal appointment.
Unfortunately, being inspiring to employees is not enough. These situations occur when employees face challenges in accomplishing goals. In such situations, a leader needs to exercise power and influence to push forth the desired goals. While the course identified five sources of power, I believe only three should be considered for an effective leader. The first is legitimate power (6), which is often considered the first source of power in the organizations I have worked in. The source of power comes...
Influence: is the process of leader communicating ideas, gaining acceptance of them, and motivating followers to support and implement the ideas through change (Lussier & Achua, 2010). This element is all about the relationship between leader and followers. Moreover influencing includes power, politics, and negotiation. Leaders gain the commitment of followers who are willing to adapt and get influenced.
McShane and von Glinow determine that the first three powers - legitimate, reward, and coercive power - are granted to persons through the organization or co-workers, whereas the two other powers – expert and referent power - depend on the “power holders own characteristics” (301). The first source of power that can be assigned to members of the organization is Legitimate Power, which is defined as an “agreement among organizational members that people in certain roles can request certain behavior of others” (302). This source of power generally results from different roles in the organization (hierarchy). Like the manager can expect his or her employees to do what he or she requires. Another source of power that can be given to employees is Reward Power, which is defined as “the person’s ability to control the allocation of rewards valued by others and to remove negative sections” (302). Reward power offers incentives and is the opposite of the third source of power, which is Coercive Power. Coercive power is the last source of power that is assigned to people and involves “the ability to apply punishment” (303). The fourth source of power is Expert Power, which does not originate from the position but rather from within the person. Expert power is “the capacity to influence others by possessing knowledge or skills that others value” (303). For instance, an employee can develop expert power when gaining important knowledge for the organizations that others would also like to have. The fifth source of power that does not depend on the role or position of an employee, but on the person’s own characteristics is Referent Power, which is defined as “the capacity to influence others on the basis of an identification with and respect for the power holder” (303).
can also be described as goal directed behavior of leaders.” leadership is the ability to influence
Leadership has been defined in different ways, a definitaion of leadership that would be most commonly accepted would be “the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organization…”(House et al., 1999, p. 184 as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 19). After a comprehensive review of different leadership literature, Stogdill (1974, p. 259, as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 18) concluded that “There are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept." Leadership can be viewed from two different angles one is shared influence process and other as a specialized role. Researcher who view leadership as a specialized role consider attributes as a factor in selecting a designated leader. On the contrast, theorist who emphasises on influence process considers “Leadership” as a social process or a pattern of relationship.
Leadership is the ability to inspire confidence, support and trust among the people who need to achieve organizational goals. (Chan & Maubourgne 1992) It invariably requires using power to influence the thoughts and actions of other people in order to create new approaches and imagine new areas to explore. This definition has emphasized on influencing people to achieve set goals. In other words, we can say, the objective of leadership is achieving goals, meanwhile, the application is influencing other people to motivate the energy and stimulate the potential towards the goals.
Schermerhorn defines leadership as 'a special case of interpersonal influence that gets an individual or group to do what the leader wants done' (287). On the other hand, Kathryn Bartol defines leadership as ?the process of influencing others to achieve organizational goals? (415). After analyzing the two quotes, I ask myself ?What is leadership?? I believe that leadership is the process of directing and guiding the behaviors of others in the appropriate directions to accomplish the goals and missions previously set. Schermerhorn and Bartol highlight the same issue, however although they are extremely similar, they address it in different words. A leader is a person who is ambitious, determined, focused, and motivated to achieve the organizational goals. The leader must have a clear understanding of individual differences in order to effectively utilize and appreciate the different contributions of different individuals. In addition, a leader must also be aware of the importance of communication between the leader and the followers; and of the communication amongst the followers themselves. Now however we may start to address the role management, and what role does it play in this enigmatic equation? Which in turn causes the rise of the question, what is the difference between leadership and m...
Legitimate Power – This is power that comes from holding a position within an organization