Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Physiological impact of rape
Physiological impact of rape
Physiological impact of rape
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Physiological impact of rape
Positivist Explanation – When reviewing the textbook in chapter 9, explains positivist or “essential” observation of outing in the direction of the world. Looking at the history of sexual abuse, it is a disorder that can be fixed with proper treatment. Example: Larry Nassar was a doctor for the Missouri State University, and was silencing his clients. After was also a doctor for the Gymnastic Olympic females. When approached by the judge he failed to prove that he was, in fact, trying to better his life and go see a private hospital or therapist for his issues. (1)(Joyce, 2018) Social Constructionist Explanation Also, from chapter 9, we realize the definition of social constructionist explanation towards sex and its various forms do vary from
To begin, I think it is important to analyze the difference between “sex” and “gender”. Up until researching for this paper, I though that the two terms were interchangeable in meaning, rather, they are separate ideas that are connected. According to Mary K. Whelan, a Doctor of Anthropology focusing on gender studies, sex and gender are different. She states, “Western conflation of sex and gender can lead to the impression that biology, and not culture, is responsible for defining gender roles. This is clearly not the case.”. She continues with, “Gender, like kinship, does have a biological referent, but beyond a universal recognition of male and female "packages," different cultures have chosen to associate very different behaviors, interactions, and statuses with men and women. Gender categories are arbitrary constructions of culture, and consequently, gender-appropriate behaviors vary widely from culture to culture.” (23). Gender roles are completely defined by the culture each person lives in. While some may think that another culture is sexist, or dem...
common mindset of one who follows the social constructs of gender roles especially in relation
Nurture side. She explains that the dominant view of gender is that it is natural (264). This
Gartner, Richard B. Betrayed as Boys: Psychodynamic Treatment of Sexually Abused Men. New York: Guilford, 1999. Print.
The Symbolic-Interaction Theory explains how everyone in a society views sexual behavior differently than others. Some cultures are more relaxed than others about sexuality and time also plays a factor in a societies viewpoint. Over a century ago, it was not acceptable to marry a woman who was not considered a virgin, but this did not always apply to males. This slowly changed due to birth control which changed how people viewed sex. Society is more tolerant of sexual activity, but some still consider sex before marriage
Traditional positivist theories advocate determinism, or the belief that factors outside of an individual’s control are to blame for criminality. The positivist’s theories were also the first school of thought to use the scientific method in research. Early, traditional positivist’s theories included only biological explanations of crime, such as Lombroso’s concept of atavism. However because positivists theories are based on the concept of determinism, Merton’s strain theory is also classified in this category. Providing a non-biological explanation for criminality traditional strain theory states that lack of structural opportunities lead an individual to crime. Specifically
It has been said that “Society has always defined for us what it means to be a man and what it means to be a woman, what a man should be like and what a woman should be like, and these traditional definitions of gender roles have limited and even harmed individuals”. The theme of sexual politics comes to mind for this quote. One can define sexual politics as the relationship of the sexes, male and female regarding power. Society’s definition of this can limit an individual in their gender role and restrain a person to not be themselves.
“Making us respect and love him was part of his plan, which is why so many people chose to believe him over his victims, and worse, why so many people were willing to cover up and even enable him further, creating an environment and culture that allowed Nassar to thrive” (par. 17). Throughout this piece, Hopkins cites stories of the women who were sexually abused by Nassar, and explores how he managed to evade punishment for decades with the help of the gymnastics institutes that actively ignored and silenced victims to tried to speak out against Nassar. In the conclusion, she concedes that “It is not easy to believe that a man you once respected, or even loved, could ever hurt someone ― let alone be responsible for the worst sexual abuse system in the history of American sports” (par. 17) but emphasizes that his charm was all part of his villainous
They make the point that neither gender nor kinship are natural but the body doesn’t make sense on its own, they state that although in the West we may say things such as ‘bad-mother’ etc. there is no such thing as a pre-cultural fact and there is ethnographic research which proves that ‘motherhood’ is not universal and is in fact a Western invention (see Shostak 1981). Instead, for Collier and Yanagisako we need to consider culture and context that these statements are made in. They stated that the study of gender should be considered completely separate from the concept of sex due to its culturally specific meaning, and abolishing the idea of sex
For instance, Kimmel explains that, “biological models assume that biological sex determines gender, that innate biological differences lead to behavioral differences, which in turn lead to social arrangements” (Kimmel 2013, 58). However, that is not true. According to anthropologist Margaret Mead, “sex differences are not ‘something deeply biological,’ but rather are learned and, once learned, become part of the ideology that continues to perpetuate them” (Kimmel 2013, 60). Basically, Mead is saying that sex roles and behavior vary from culture to culture. As a result, gender is developed primarily by socialization or based on one’s cultural environment. Therefore, the social constructionist theory argues that, “not only do gendered individuals negotiate their identities within gendered institutions, but also those institutions produce the very differences we assume are the properties of individuals” (Kimmel 2013, 127). Hence, gender is not something an individual is born with, instead, gender takes time to
Gender and sexuality is two completely different thing. In fact I have to argue that Lorber and Jhally is wrong to to view socialization as the only theory that best explains gender. According to Jhally explanation in the video “ Gender coded” gender is social construct and is useful for stressing the aspect of femininity and masculinity . In the video Jhally claim that there is nothing natural about gender identity. It confine with gender norm. Later in the video, he explain that “ women were use to ease and remove the idea of homosexual from male. And male and female are defined through each other” (code of gender). Women are weak, vulnerable, mental drifting and emotional. While men are strong, more relax,calm, active, and are emotionless. Femininity is viewed as submissive/ powerless female, who present themselves according to society's standards. Unlike masculinity that dominant gender norm. Gender’s critical view like Lorber and Jhally act as a disadvantage to analysis because they’re missing out on the biological view. As Jhally mention men are women are defined through each other. Social construct is just the image use for display. Biology behide a person sexaulity can not be ingore. Both biological and social construct contritute to a person sexuliaty there for it unreasonably to strive for non gender
Social Construction of Gender Today’s society plays a very important role in the construction of gender. Gender is a type of issue that has raised many questions over the years in defining and debating if both male and female are equal. Today, gender is constructed in four different ways. The The first way gender is defined is by the family in which a child is raised.
Gender is such a ubiquitous notion that humans assume gender is biological. However, gender is a notion that is made up in order to organize human life. It is created and recreated giving power to the dominant gender, creating an inferior gender and producing gender roles. There are many questionable perspectives such as how two genders are learned, how humans learn their own gender and others genders, how they learn to appropriately perform their gender and how gender roles are produced. In order to understand these perspectives, we must view gender as a social institution. Society bases gender on sex and applies a sex category to people in daily life by recognizing gender markers. Sex is the foundation to which gender is created. We must understand the difference between anatomical sex and gender in order to grasp the development of gender. First, I will be assessing existing perspectives on the social construction of gender. Next, I will analyze three case studies and explain how gender construction is applied in order to provide a clearer understanding of gender construction. Lastly, I will develop my own case study by analyzing the movie Mrs. Doubtfire and apply gender construction.
Social Construction of Gender is a process, stratification system and structure. The day to day interactions emphasize gender as opposites. Take for instance, conversations, formalities of daily life, sayings, and so on. The social construction of gender is created through social interaction – through the things we do and say with other people. This means that gender it is not a fixed or inherent fact, but instead it varies across time and place.
The social construction of gender is the ubiquitous and systematically constructed concept in which society compartmentalizes gender roles and associative behaviors/ideals. Under this paradigm, “appropriate” comportments of behavior per gender are emphasized. The social construction of gender almost exclusively lends itself to a binary/dialectical framework through which the notions of masculinity and femininity are not only conceptualized, but also enacted on a conscious and subconscious level (“doing gender”) In respect to this notion, gender studies scholar, Judith Lorber expresses, “Most people find it hard to believe that gender is constantly created and recreated out of human