Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How the media portrays blacks
Sexism in films essay
Gender inequality in movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How the media portrays blacks
American cinema can connect us to our American experience through the portrayal of ideal lifestyles. However the American experience shown in films is generally flawed particularly in its portrayal of the American dream, disparagement of women and minorities and demonizing of other cultures. One might think as time passed and hollywood became more progressive these practices would grow out of favor however these trends are all too present in modern hollywood blockbusters. That being said American cinema is not limited to hollywood and boasts a healthy independent community that is making massive strides in progressive filmmaking. Before discussing how cinema might disconnect us from our American experience we must discuss what exactly is …show more content…
The study found that in 2012 Blacks comprised only 10.8 percent of speaking roles compared to 76.3 percent by white actors. This however is not limited to blacks, Latinos comprised only 4.2 percent of speaking roles despite as of 2012 being 17 percent of the overall population. This is not simply an issue of whites paying to see white people on camera. According to the MPAA 26 percent of film tickets were sold to hispanics in 2013. In the case of the 2001 film a Beautiful Mind the wife of protagonist John Nash, Alicia Nash, was casted to a white actress despite in reality immigrating from el salvador. This is significant given that the film was based on a biography that highlighted the inspiration that Alicia provided her husband by being an immigrant. However in the story her background is completely excluded from the film in order to cast a white actress. It can then be argued that the message being told to audiences by doing this, is that their stories and experiences are less important if they are not …show more content…
This is not to say that there still not issue with this. Women are still underrepresented in films regardless of the demographic, for example for every 2.48 men within films we see 1 woman. This is however does not mean that these women are the protagonists of the films. Only that they have speaking parts. If the former were the case the number would be much lower. Which was shown by a study published in US news found that only 12 percent of protagonists in films were played by Women. They were also overwhelmingly white at 73 perecent of the total pool. The issue of women being portrayed within films does not stop at underrepresentation. Over sexualization of women in films is extremely common. The study published by USC found that 41 percent of Hispanic women in films are portrayed in sexual clothing and 39 percent appear nude. These numbers are not much lower for other races. Black and White rate of sexualization and nudity were both above 30 percent as of 2012. This a huge disparity between the amount of males that are depicted sexually in films. Black males have the highest rate of depiction in sexual clothing at 10.8 percent while hispanic men have the lowest at 2.7 despite the Hispanic Female holding a number almost 20 time
Movies are a new edition in today’s culture. They are a new form of art medium that has arrived in the late 1900s and were a new way to express ideas and viewpoints of the time. A good example of this is the movie The Manchurian Candidate. The movie had a simple plot a man is kidnapped after the Korean war and is hypnotized to work for the communists and take down the U.S. This movie showed the American public’s fear of communism at the time. If a movie like this can easily portray the fears of the American people at the time then it can easily portray stereotypes of gender. There have been thousands of movies where the male protagonist is a rough tough dude but there is one movie that has that stereotype is broken. That movie is none other than Napoleon Dynamite.
The overall appeal of the cinema to the masses was particularly evident during the interwar era. Audiences worldwide wanted to watch the variety of films, particularly American produced films, and they always went back. The visibly attractive and glamorous Hollywood movies often depicted the success of the underdog over unjust authority. Values of cash over culture were often a theme in the early American films and societies with restricted social mobility, such as those in Europe, could dream of such a triumph. The working class and unemployed could fantasise about wealth, fame and freedom which America as a country was portrayed as offering.
We are daunted by the idea that our movies in America are not going to be as successful as we hope. With that being said, many movies are made based around the same topic. According to one article, “Hollywood has made
Have you ever had one of those days that were so bad that you desperately needed a night at the ice cream or candy store? The 1970’s was that really bad day, while the night of self- indulgence was the 1980’s. Americans love to escape from our daily stress, and of all the products that allow us to do so, none is more popular than the movies. Movies are key cultural artifacts that offer a view of American culture and social history. They not only offer a snapshot of hair styles and fashions of the times but they also provide a host of insights into Americans’ ever-changing ideals. Like any cultural artifact, the movies can be approached in a number of ways. Cultural historians have treated movies as a document that records the look and mood of the time that promotes a particular political or moral value or highlights individual or social anxieties and tensions. These cultural documents present a particular image of gender, ethnicity, romance, and violence. Out of the political and economic unrest of the 1970’s that saw the mood and esteem of the country, as reflected in the artistry and messages in the movies, sink to a new low, came a new sense of pride in who we are, not seen since the post-World War II economic boom of the 1950’s. Of this need to change, Oscar Award winner Paul Newman stated,
Today, only 16% of protagonists in movies are female, and the portrayal of these women is
In America is a movie about an Irish family that immigrates to New York in order to find better work and improve their lives, but end up finding that it is very difficult to live in the U.S. This is due to the problems they face involving health, money, and the overall environment of the place they live. There are many aspects of cultural geography that are brought up throughout the movie. Some examples include the neighborhood they live in, class of people, and the health factors that impact the people that live there.
In recent times, such stereotyped categorizations of films are becoming inapplicable. ‘Blockbusters’ with celebrity-studded casts may have plots in which characters explore the depths of the human psyche, or avant-garde film techniques. Titles like ‘American Beauty’ (1999), ‘Fight Club’ (1999) and ‘Kill Bill 2’ (2004) come readily into mind. Hollywood perhaps could be gradually losing its stigma as a money-hungry machine churning out predictable, unintelligent flicks for mass consumption. While whether this image of Hollywood is justified remains open to debate, earlier films in the 60’s and 70’s like ‘Bonnie and Clyde’ (1967) and ‘Taxi Driver’ (1976) already revealed signs of depth and avant-garde film techniques. These films were successful as not only did they appeal to the mass audience, but they managed to communicate alternate messages to select groups who understood subtleties within them.
In the 1930s, aspects of pre-feminism in Hollywood movies were rampant (Hugel 1). This helps to explain why women were given limited roles in the movies. The women were portrayed as symbols of love. The women never participated in other active roles. Because they were weak creatures that could not perform other challenging roles in the society (Horowitz 41). The women were also presented as victims of the environment in which they lived.
" Cinema and the Nation. Ed. Mette Hjort and Scott Mackenzie. New York City, NY: Routledge, 2000. 260-277.
The depictions of women in films have changed in time with society to ensure the films popularity.
One of the biggest problems we face today in the media is the lack of characters represented by minorities. According to Vadim Rizov, a reporter for The Dissolve,” Across 100 top-grossing films of 2012, only 10.8 percent of speaking characters are
Feminism is a movement that supports women equality within society. In relation to film, feminism is what pushes the equal representation of females in mainstream films. Laura Mulvey is a feminist theorist that is famous for touching on this particular issue of how men and women are represented in movies. Through her studies, she discovered that many films were portraying men and women very differently from reality. She came up with a theory that best described why there is such as huge misrepresentation of the social status quos of male and female characters. She believed that mainstream film is used to maintain the status quo and prevent the realization of gender equality. This is why films are continuously following the old tradition that males are dominant and females are submissive. This is the ideology that is always present when we watch a movie. This is evident in the films from the past but also currently. It is as if the film industry is still catering to the male viewers of each generation in the same way. Laura Mulvey points out that women are constantly being seen as sexual objects, whether it is the outfits they wear or do not wear or the way they behave, or secondary characters with no symbolic cause. She states that, “in traditional exhibitionist role women are simultaneously looked at and displayed, with their appearance coded for strong visual and erotic impact so that they can be said to connote it-be-looked-at-ness.”(Mulvey pg. 715). Thus, women are nevertheless displayed as nothing more than passive objects for the viewing pleasure of the audience. Mulvey also points out through her research that in every mainstream movie, there is ...
The evolution of American cinema can be classified into four main categories, silent film, classic Hollywood cinema, new Hollywood and the contemporary period, which we are in now .During the early 20th century many eastern European Jewish immigrants were able to find work in the American film industry and eventually moved over to the production side of the movie business to become some of the biggest producers, such as The Warner Brothers.
Much like football and fresh apple pie, the cinema is an American pastime. It is rooted in the 20th century and has matured over the decades, mirroring the social and cultural growth of our nation. Compared to their precursors, contemporary films vary in content and target audience and convey a multitude of messages to viewers. But film would not demonstrate such variety without the cultural staple of our media, a constitutional right that is, in itself, an American pastime. Freedom of speech, as provided by the First Amendment, has fertilized the growth of cinema, and, in kind, the history of film has proven that free speech is easily applied to many media platforms, protective of controversial content, and accessible to all Americans, regardless of cultural background. The cinema is embedded in our nation’s history, driven by our passion for the motion picture and preserved by the inalienable rights provided by the First Amendment.
How did the invention of television affect filmmaking in America? There were 3 main reasons which brought about a vertical disintegration of the film industry. Firstly the SC forced studios to get rid of owned cinema chains during 1948. Secondly there were changes to social-demographic structures in U.S. which triggered shifts to entertainment within homes & many of the young couples started living in new suburbs & wanted to remain home for their entertainment needs.