Point Of Equality Analysis

368 Words1 Page

Elizabeth S. Anderson discusses different concepts of egalitarianism (cf. Anderson p. 289) in her article “What is the Point of Equality?” (will be cited as “Anderson”) published in 1999. She examines the differences between “’luck egalitarianism’ [and] ‘equality of fortune’” (Anderson, p. 289) by looking at “people’s talents, aspirations, roles, and cultures” (Anderson, p. 308); whereas gender is barely mentioned by her except for in a few lines (cf. Anderson p. 188, pp. 319-320).
This aspect of egalitarianism has had a significant role in society for a very long time and is still a relevant topic. Gender equality or sexual equality is defined as e.g. “the state of having the same rights, status, and opportunities as others, regardless of one’s gender” (cf. dictionary.com).
Even nowadays women earn …show more content…

They are people who are born with characteristics of both sexes, including chromosomes, hormones, or genitals. Additionally, more and more people like to label themselves as transsexual, genderqueer, genderfluid or non-binary, which are not legally accepted genders (or lack thereof).
These people still have a hard time fitting into society, as they belong to a minority many people don’t even know about. The majority of the population isn’t willing to include these members of the minority as these are fairly “new” things – new in this case doesn’t mean that they haven’t been around but that it is new to society discovering these “phenomena” to exist. In addition to this, this difficulty raises the problem of pronouns, where e.g. non-binary people like themselves being referred to as “they/them” rather than being associated with a certain traditional gender. This issue is mostly disregarded or not even known of, which causes people who associate themselves with one of these “new” genders to feel like they are being treated unfairly.
Regarding these issues, achieving equality in this field is still a hard and long way to

Open Document