Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Colonialism and racialism reflected in Joseph Conrad Heart of Darkness chapter 2
Colonialism and racialism reflected in Joseph Conrad Heart of Darkness chapter 2
Post-colonial analysis of joseph conrad’s heart of darkness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Discourse means communication or debate. (oxford dictionary). The word discourse is used to show the difference of opinions among people. Plato who was a famous philosopher has written about discourse in many of his works. In Gorgias he shows discourse among Callicles and Socrates. Callicles, a character from Plato's work argued with Socrates that he believed stronger people had the right to oppress the weaker ones. He said that nature itself proves this fact. He gave an example of animals to illustrate his point. According to him, strong animals always prey on the weaker ones, this is how the food chain works. The lion attacks a cat and a cat preys after a mouse, this shows that the weaker ones tend to preyed on by the stronger animal. Callicles thinks that it is okay to oppress people when you have the power. He considers oppressing people a far better thing than being oppressed. …show more content…
'Colonialism is the policy of occupying political control over another country' (Oxford dictionary). The British had power and considered themselves as civilized. They thought that the non-English people were savages and that they were not civilized. The British thought that they should civilize these savages. This is also called the white mans burden. The mission of civilizing the Indians (natives) was used as a tool to loot, plunder, murder and oppress the natives. A book the heart of darkness is based on how white men treat the natives. The book shows Kurtz, the English dealer and his attitude towards the natives. When Marlow, a worker for the same company as Kurtz goes to visit Kurtz he finds out that the natives worship Kurtz and he also sees that there are heads of natives on display near his house. The entire book shows how these civilized men treated the natives in the most gruesome ways and thought what they did was right. (Conrad, Joseph.
In the Encomium of Helen, Gorgias attempts to prove Helen’s innocence since she is blamed to be the cause of the Trojan War. Gorgias uses rhetoric to persuade listeners to believe why there are only four reasons to explain why Helen was driven to Troy. All of which he will argue were not her fault. Fate was the first cause, followed by force. Gorgias then seems to focus the most on the power of Logos, or words. Finally he explains how she could have been compelled by love (82B116).
A Discourse Community is a group of people whose members share the same goals and use mechanisms to communicate with each other through an acquired, specific lexis that enables individuals to attain goals with the help of other expert and intermediate members.
The art of rhetoric is an essential and prevalent tool in various aspects of past, present, and future societies. Aristotle lets “rhetoric be [defined as] an ability, in each [particular] case, to see the available means of persuasion” (Aristotle, 115). Rhetoric, when used accurately, allows a speaker to be inspirational, captivating, and thought-provoking. However, the results of correctly using rhetoric can be negative or positive, for example the horrendous aftermath of Hitler’s use of rhetoric when convincing a whole half continent that race extermination is permissible. Gorgias of Leontini’s Encomium of Helen demonstrates a clear application of rhetoric during his pursuit of riding Helen of Troy of her ill reputation. I will elaborate
A Discourse Community is a group of people that share a set of goals or discourses and within this group, find ways to communicate about these set goals. Discourse Communities can mean having a spot on a sports team, being a part of a school club, and even your workplace can be considered a discourse community. To be accepted into a discourse community, one must seen as a credible source, one that has knowledge on the topic at hand and can help the group reach the goals of the discourse community. When joining a discourse community, it is important that one learns how those in the group use effective ways of communicating.
When a person is asked what he or she knows about discourse community, they might not have any idea of what that means. However, they are probably involved in more than one discourse community. Discourse community in a general definition means that a number of people who have the same interests, values, concerns, or goals. The discourse community term spanned to include everything from religions and morals to sports and games. In all these various kinds of discourse communities, there are some common fundamental forms of communication that participate in keeping these groups related like written regulations, requirements, instructions, and schedules. Being a
This is an argument made by Socrates to Callicles in Plato’s Gorgias 495d – 497d. This argument makes many claims in order to determine if good and pleasure are the same or different and if bad and painful are the same or different. The following will analyzes the argument that Socrates makes and determines if the argument is valid or strong and whether the argument is sound or cogent. Furthermore the errors in the argument are dissected and enlighten to how the argument could have been better constructed.
Heart of Darkness shows imperialism in more of a physical and psychological perspective. The main character Marlow, in his beliefs, shows a positive side to imperialism. Marlow does openly admit that he does not belong as an invader to this land that is not his; however, he also says that he will try to help these people, the antithesis of most, if not all, of his comrades. Concerning these imperialistic invasions, he says,
“ The conquest of the earth, which mostly means the taking it away from those who have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much.” (Conrad 65) So stated Marlow as though this was his justification for ravaging the Congo in his search for ivory. Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness shows the disparity between the European ideal of civilization and the reality of it as is evidenced by the domination, torture, exploitation and dehumanization of the African population. Heart of Darkness is indicative of the evil and greed in humanity as personified by Kurtz and Marlow.
An essay arguing that Joseph Conrad is more critical of Whites than Blacks in Heart of Darkness. To the vast majority of Europeans of the 19th century, colonization was a noble cause that brought civilization, Christianity and culture to underdeveloped civilizations. Many Europeans believed that they were welcomed abroad and were improving societies in the name of God. Far ahead of his time, Joseph Conrad saw the hypocrisy in this thinking.
In Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad, challenges a dominant view by exposing the evil nature and the darkness associated with the colonialist ventures. It is expressed by Marlow as "robbery with violence, aggravated murder on a great scale, and men going at it blind - as it is very proper for those who tackle a darkness." The European colonialists are portrayed as blind lightbearers, people having a façade of progress and culture, yet are blind of their actions. They think they are brining a light to a darkness, yet they are the real darkness or evil. Conrad's critique of European colonialism is most apparent through the oppositions of light and darkness, with the contrast of good and evil in characters often foregrounding and developing Conrad's theme of the "darkness" in an activity said to "bring light" to a culture void of these elements.
Imperialism sprung from an altruistic and unselfish aim to "take up the white man's burden"1 and “wean [the] ignorant millions from their horrid ways.”2 These two citations are, of course, from Kipling’s “White Man’s Burden” and Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, respectively, and they splendidly encompass what British and European imperialism was about – at least seen from the late-nineteenth century point of view. This essay seeks to explore the comparisons and contrasts between Conrad’s and Kipling’s view of imperialism in, respectively, Heart of Darkness and “White Man’s Burden” and “Recessional.”
Through several examples, Conrad often shows the pointlessness and savagery of the English colonization in Africa. Probably the first instance of this is when Marlow comes up to the French-man who is "shelling the bush". In this scene, the French see something move and so they start shelling it for that reason. The shelling really does no good; if fact, it probably does not even kill what is out there. This represents what the English are doing in a way -- they are trying to conquer a land by shelling it to death and by trying to kill all the people who live there. The next example that Conrad gives is when he sees the black guard, who is leading the black slaves in a chain gang, straighten up when he sees a white man. What this shows is how everyone tries to look better than they are when they are in front of a supposed superior person. Also it shows that if a person can suck up enough -- and sometimes betray their own people -- they can move up in the world.
At the time Heart of Darkness was written, the British Empire was at its peak, and Britain controlled colonies and dependencies all over the planet. The popular saying that "the sun never sets on the British Empire" was literally true. The main topic of Heart of Darkness is imperialism, a nation's policy of exerting influence over other areas through military, political, and economic coercion. The first narrator expresses the mainstream belief that imperialism is a glorious and worthy enterprise. Indeed, in Conrad's time, "empire" was one of the central values of British subjects, the fundamental term through which Britain defined its identity and sense of purpose.
Throughout Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad points to the hypocrisy and horrors associated with colonialism. The half-English, half-French Kurtz is the main vehicle used to convey his theme of European colonialism, as “all [of] Europe contributed to the making of Kurtz” (Conrad 164). It was Kurtz who goes to Africa for the "sake of loot, and thus becomes a great literary symbol for the decadence of colonialism" (Zins 63). With his help, Marlow dissects the reasoning behind colonialism, eventually seeing its evil nature.
The novella stands as a document against the imperialist practices -- Conrad was quite liberal for the time. The natives are referred to as "savages" several times throughout the story, but Conrad is not using any particularly strong words for the time. The European audiences who would be reading would not find anything racist about it. By today's more sensitive standards, such deference is more serious, but turn-of-the-century England was sure to expect far harsher.