Philosophy Of Servant Leadership

492 Words1 Page

The principles and characteristics of servant leadership are difficult for organizations to define because its philosophy lies in the essence of spirit rather than the concrete substance of it, (2010). The seven different emphases reviewed by Stephen Prosser in our text book attempt to frame the concepts of servant leadership to the needs of their organization, rewriting and interpreting a holistic mindset to justify a lineal contribution to their business. I found the majority of the seven different emphases of servant leadership described unreservedly divergent in my understanding of the philosophy of true servant leadership. Conversely, the majority of the emphases and the principles applied in their operations seemingly missed Greenleaf’s main principle, the commitment to being a servant, or the servant-leader is servant first, (2010). The emphases most divergent to my philosophy of servant leadership were the Egalitarians, Poets, Peripherals, Managerialists and Systematizers. Such as, the Egalitarians main focus is redistributing power, sharing authority equally amongst the group and consensus decision-making, lacks Greenleaf’s main concept, servant-leader is servant first. Whereas, the Managerialists ideology has taken …show more content…

In this way, serving others with unconditional love and misguided biases’, from the position of equality, unleashes a transparent circular process, intangible yet concrete holistic life with meaning.
Reference
Prosser, S. (2010). Opportunities and Tensions of Servant Leadership. In D. van Dierendonch & K. Patterson (Eds.), Servant Leadership Developments in Theory and Research (p. 26, 29, & 34). Retrieved from:

Open Document