THE USE THEORY OF MEANING
A Reading of the Philosophical Investigations
Anil Kumar
In the opening section of the Investigations, Wittgenstein gave a simple statement as ‘a particular picture of the essence of human language’. The individual words of language name objects sentences are combinations of such names. In this picture of language we find the roots of the following idea: Every word has a meaning. This meaning is correlated with the word. It is the object for which the word stands (PI 1). It means there is a relationship between words and objects through language. We might say that in the case of word and object it is one of meaning- the meaning of a word being ‘the object for which the word stands’. The meaning seems to depend, rather, on the meanings of the words making up the sentence.
…show more content…
Having described the ‘particular picture’ of human language (which is essentially that of the Tractatus) he immediately gives an example of someone asking for ‘five red apples’ in a shop, and points out that each of these words has to be acted upon in a different way. To comply with the word ‘apples’, the shopkeeper opens a drawer marked ‘apples’; for the word ‘red’, he looks at a colour-chart; and in the case of ‘five’, he says the numbers from one to five, taking out an apple for each number (PI 1). This diversity of use is to be contrasted with the uniformity of the ‘particular picture of human language’. Wittgenstein then proceeds to pose what may be called the ‘meaning question’, choosing for this purpose the word ‘five’. But what is the meaning of the word ‘five’? (PI 1). One may be inclined to think that there must be an object of some kind, corresponding to the word ‘five’, in virtue of which it has
A Pulitzer Prize is an award for an achievement in American journalism, literature, or music. Paul Gigot, chairman of the Pulitzer Prize board, described the award as a “proud and robust tradition”. How does one carry on this robust tradition? By mastery of skilled writing technique, one can be considered for the awarding of this prize. Since its creation in 1917, 13 have been awarded annually, one of which, in 1939, was given to Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings for her novel, The Yearling. Rawlings is an American author from Florida known for writing rural themed novels. Consequently, The Yearling is about a boy living on a farm who adopts an orphaned fawn. Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings procured a prestigious Pulitzer Prize for her effectual use of figurative language, sensory details, and syntax.
First, a brief background in the three dimensions of language discussed throughout this paper. The functional, semantic, or thematic dimensions of language as previously mentioned are often used in parallel with each other. Due, to this fact it is important to be able to identify them as they take place and differentiate between these dimensions i...
Throughout the years many people have put their feelings about the United States Justice system into poems or songs. We have heard various artist refer to the system as being very corrupt and about public officials abusing their power. In 2002, Lauryn Hill released the MTV Unplugged 2.0 album. On this album, there were twenty-one songs. One of the songs was called “The Mystery of Iniquity”. This song featured many verses that reflect the corruption in the American legal system. This song also reveals many significant facts about America’s justice system. Finally, in this song she instructs people to wake up and realize that everything the government tells us is not the truth. Lauryn Hill has never been shy when expressing her beliefs in her songs. Lauryn Hill was first with the Fugees when America first heard her unique voice. As a singer and rapper, she has always been very
Any philosopher's thought is though possible to have a private language intelligible only to one subject. Wittgenstein showed that a private language is fundamentally incoherent, due to misunderstanding of the grammar of ordinary language. I will begin by discussing private language with meaning, and with why it was attractive to philosophers. Afterwards, I will discuss some ways how Wittgenstein approached meaning in general and the meaning of “pain” in particular. I would discuss ways how Wittgenstein showed how confusing the grammatical function of psychological words such as pain, lead to nonsensical philosophical problems. Furthermore, I will present a version of the private language argument, as Wittgenstein showing that the idea of private language depends on the misunderstanding of the grammar of sensation language, of how sensation language gets its meaning and functions.
...ven though the categories seem to vary, such differences are due only to differences in the "surface grammar" of language, the ways in which things are understood as meaningful. When asked why languages are structured in certain ways, some theorists claim that the brain and our neural networks form the "deep grammar" of what things mean.
Wittgenstein thought that the nature of language could tell us what can and cannot be done with it. He believed this because he deduced that language had its own limits fixed within its structure.
There are lots of evidences to prove that there are many meanings of a single word. In many Hollywood movies, “Son of a bitch” is frequently spoken. Here, what does ‘bitch’ mean? Is it the female dog? Or it is a prostitute? But there is nothing to do with the meaning of a bitch to the listener. The listener simply thinks that he/she is really very angry. So we can say that everything that matters is how a listeners take the speaker’s word and its meaningful
Taylor’s discontent is directed toward one influential attempt to resolve the old problem of meaning in the philosophy of language, a problem which has fuelled debate for centuries. This is what Taylor calls the ‘designative’ theory of meaning, the view that meaning consists in the role of individual words and sentences as designators for objects, relations, ideas and so forth in the world. This position represents a shift in our world-view, a shift which Taylor feels has done wonders to advance science, but which ultimately has moved us away from any plausible account of human nature...
ABSTRACT: The later Wittgenstein uses children in his philosophical arguments against the traditional views of language. Describing how they learn language is one of his philosophical methods for setting philosophers free from their views and enabling them to see the world in a different way. The purpose of this paper is to explore what features of children he takes advantage of in his arguments, and to show how we can read Wittgenstein in terms of education. Two children in Philosophical Investigations are discussed. The feature of the first child is the qualitative difference from adults. Wittgenstein uses the feature to criticize Augustinian pictures of language which tell us that children learn language by ostensive definition alone. The referential theory of meaning is so strong that philosophers fail to see the qualitative gap and to explain language-learning. The second child appears in an arithmetical instruction. Although he was understood to master counting numbers, he suddenly shows deviant reactions. Wittgenstein argues against the mentalistic idea of understanding by calling attention to the potential otherness of the child. This could happen anytime the child has not learned counting correctly. The two features show that teaching is unlike telling, an activity toward the other who does not understand our explanations. Since we might not understand learners because of otherness, the justification of teaching is a crucial problem that is not properly answered so long as otherness is unrecognized. As long as we ignore otherness, we would not be aware that we might mistreat learners.
Gottlob Frege (1) asserts that, in addition to the denotation of a sign (2), there is also a meaning attached. (3) The denotation is the specific thing that a sign refers to. The meaning, however, is the actual intention behind using the sign. It follows from this distinction that signs may be identical, but have different functions in a proposition. When it comes to meanings, it is not necessarily the case that the respective denotations of the same sign are equivalent. In fact, Frege argues, there may well be meaning without any denotation whatsoever. As an example, he uses 'the celestial body most distant from the Earth'. While this expression most likely has meaning, it is doubtful that it denotes anything. Frege concludes, "In grasping a (meaning), one is not certainly assured of (denoting) anything". (4) Yet, Frege admits, we must presuppose that there is, indeed a denotation, in order to grasp the meaning. He admits that while we may be mistaken in our assumption, the importance lies in the intention of the speaker, not in the existence of the denotation.
Wittgenstein's first line in the “Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus” states “1.The world is everything that is the case” (29) followed by “1.1 The world is the totality of facts, not of things” (29). Wittgenstein is trying to express that the world is not defined by all things within it. Rather that all the things in this world are created by facts, hence the world is a collection of facts rather than things. Furthermore he states “The facts in logical space are the world” (29). Reinforcing that the world is made up of facts. It is essential to a thing that it can be a constituent part of an atomic fact” (29). According to Wittgenstein atomic facts ar...
This might seem a pointless endeavor when we consider the kind of paradox that Wittgenstein’s theory of language presents, yet Wittgenstein was deeply familiar with the paradoxical nature of his argument. Wittgenstein advances that “[i]t is clear ethics cannot be put into words. Ethics is transcendental” (TLP 6.421). Yet, the philosopher advances in one of the final sections of the Tractatus that “[t]here are, indeed, things that cannot be put into words. They make themselves manifest. They are what is mystical” (TLP 6.522). If these ineffable things do indeed exist outside the realm of language—that realm which Wittgenstein’s linguistic solipsism denotes as the limit of our thought—in what realm do they exist? In the same letter I previously mentioned that Wittgenstein wrote to von Ficker, the philosopher
Semantics is commonly defined as “the study of meaning.” Any subject that covers a wide and diverse subject matter, such as “meaning,” will not be merely understood with a single sentence explanation. To begin understanding semantics, one must have a grasp on its different branches, including, general, conceptual, and lexical semantics. While there are almost endless branches, these three primary examples embody the native elements of semantics.
Research philosophy, refers to the development of knowledge adopted by the researchers in their research (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). In other words, it is the theory that used to direct the researcher for conducting the procedure of research design, research strategy, questionnaire design and sampling (Malhotra, 2009). It is very important to have a clear understanding of the research philosophy so that we could examine the assumptions about the way we view the world, which are contained in the research philosophy we choose, knowing that whether they are appropriate or not (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009), three major ways of thinking about research philosophy are examined: ontology, epistemology and axiology. Each of them carries significant differences which will have an impact on the way we consider the research procedures. Ontology, “is concerned with nature of reality”, while epistemology “concerns what constitutes acceptable knowledge in a field of study and axiology “studies judgements about value” (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009, p110, p112, p116). This study is intent on creating some “facts” from objective evaluations which are made by the subjects. Therefore, epistemology will be chosen for this study as the way of thinking about the research philosophy.
Philosophy is an old academic discipline that studies many different areas in life. Philosophy is the base to ask, answer and argue about something and also can be supported by certain ideologies. Since ancient Greece, philosophers have studied different areas within philosophy from education, social economy to philosophy in politics. This academic discipline is the development of ideas of people that intended to express their thoughts. Philosophy can be applied in many situations and used in any part of the world. Philosophy can be defined by the way we think and behave whenever we face certain situations. It brings up our values and thoughts about anything we do in life. Not everyone has the same philosophy towards the same issue. The way a person is raised has a great impact on this person’s perception of life. Values, ethics morals and other factors can define how individuals create their own philosophy about life and attach themselves to events that happen during their life time, creating an idea about a particular situation. There are positions within philosophy that might contradict each other. Most of the Philosophies or ideologies discussed in our textbook “Philosophical and Ideological Voices in Education incorporate the four subdivisions of philosophy in any way, either to support or reject the ideas of others. Metaphysics, Epistemology, Axiology and logic are the subdivisions of philosophy that are either used to support the ideas of certain philosophers and other completely reject them. Some philosopher’s ideas are either in one extreme or the other, and the rest lay in between the two, this meaning that a philosophy can share or incorporate ideas from different areas of philosophy and others can reject or be gains th...