Phillis Wheatley On Being Brought From Africa To America Summary

777 Words2 Pages

Study of the Religious and Allusory Diction in Wheatley’s On Being Brought from Africa to America
Phillis Wheatley was born around 1753 and was the first African American woman to publish a book of poems. Her famous poem On Being Brought from Africa to America concerns her stand against slaves being treated as simply objects to be used under the name of God. Susan Lippert Martin’s journal article Diabolic Dye, Commodities, and Refinement in Phillis Wheatley’s ON BEING BROUGHT FROM AFRICA TO AMERICA analyzes the poem in-depth from the significance of the entire piece down to a single word. My intent in reading her essay was to gain more understanding on who Phillis Wheatley was as a person and where she stood in her society, for I have not …show more content…

Martin mentions in her opening paragraph that in Wheatley’s poem, “she is testifying to her belief that people of African descent are equal in God’s sight to white people…” (Martin 157). Wheatley is knowledgeable of Christian theology, but that does not necessarily make her religious. Martin answers my question with the next paragraph, writing “…her fate in life was dictated in large measure by human choice, attitude, and behavior, she ascribes to God those circumstances both past and present that have shaped her life…” (Martin 158). Therefore, Wheatley must believe God exists in order to “ascribe” to him. From this point on Martin continues to prove that Wheatley believes, even if she is not religious, by mentioning how men do not control Wheatley’s life, but God …show more content…

She again makes reference to both products of slavery and religious standing with her lines: “‘Remember, Christians, Negroes, black as Cain, / May be refined, and join the angelic train’” (Wheatley). Martin makes the connection that slaves are seen simply as tools or animals to be used instead of humans. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, one of the definitions of refined is: “purified; freed from impurities or extraneous matter… of a substance or product (especially sugar or oil)” (Oxford English Dictionary, Def. 3.1). Thus, Wheatley could have possibly used the word in reference to the slave production of sugar. Furthermore, she is declaring that there is no way in God’s eyes that she could be considered the same as sugar, as in something to simply be used and disposed of. She is a human being, not just an object to be

Open Document