Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critiques on stanford prison study
The stanford prison project
Analysis of the stanford prison experiment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critiques on stanford prison study
In Philip Zimbardo’s Ted Talk he discusses his book The Lucifer Effect and the psychology of evil. Zimbardo asks “what makes people go wrong?” It does not take much to turn a good person to a bad person. For most people it is like a light switch that can be turned on and off. In 1971, Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment by the name of The Stanford Prison Experiment. Students volunteered to be either be a prisoner or a prison guard for 2 weeks. Zimbardo was studying how the college boys would react and how their behavior would change even though they were separated by a coin flip. By the 3rd day the prison guards began to abuse the prisoners in a physically and sexually manner because they had the authority to do so. The Abu Ghraib Prison in Iraq relates closely to Zimbardo’s experiment, because no one stepped in to stop the actions that were taking place soon enough. …show more content…
The Abu Ghraib Prison took place in 2003.
The United States Military Police guards tortured suspected terrorists and innocent Iraqi men and women in cells. Prisoners of both the Stanford Prison Experiment and Abu Ghraib were tortured and humiliated by taking pictures of them with bags over their heads, making them wear degrading clothes or no clothes at all, and having them perform sexual simulations with each other such as sodomy and fallattio. Zimbardo says that, “They began to do degrading activities like having them simulate sodomy.” (Zimbardo,15:37). Prisoners in both of the experiments experienced mental breakdowns due to physical, emotional, and mental torture. The prison guards and the military police were given permission to have authority over the prisoners by a more powerful figure and started to abuse their authority to the point of no
return. In Zimbardo’s book, The Lucifer Effect, he explains his experiment into deep depths from beginning to end. Throughout the book there are many mentions of the Abu Ghraib incident. While watching the news in 2004, Zimbardo came across the horrific images of naked prisoners stacked into a pyramid, men with collars and leashes on, and a man with a sandbag over his head with wires hooked to him to conduct electric torture. Zimbardo says, “I realized that watching some of these images made me relive the worst scenes from the Stanford Prison Experiment.” (Zimbardo, 328) Today most people are evil without even knowing. Sometimes doing evil things feels like the right action to take during a specific time but being cruel to a human being without even thinking that they are the same as yourself is terrible. Bullying can turn a good person into a bad person in the span of a second. Othering another person because of the color of their skin, the clothes they wear, or the rumors you hear has lead to devastation from suicides and mental illnesses over the years. A bully just like a prison guard or a United States military police can cause long term damage that can take years to fix just like the prisoners in the Stanford Prison Experiment and Abu Ghraib Prison. Work Cited Zimbardo, Philip. The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random.2007.Print Zimbardo, Philip. The Psychology of Evil. TED. February 2008. Lecture
In the pursuit of safety, acceptance, and the public good, many atrocities have been committed in places such as Abu Ghraib and My Lai, where simple, generally harmless people became the wiling torturers and murderers of innocent people. Many claim to have just been following orders, which illustrates a disturbing trend in both the modern military and modern societies as a whole; when forced into an obedient mindset, many normal and everyday people can become tools of destruction and sorrow, uncaringly inflicting pain and death upon the innocent.
Marianne Szegedy-Maszak, a senior writer at U.S. News and World, published her article, "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism," in 2004. She uses the article to briefly overview the scandal as a whole before diving into what can trigger sadistic behavior. The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal took place in 2004, wherein American troops humiliated and tortured Iraqi detainees (Szegedy-Maszak 75). The main objective of Szegedy-Maszak’s article is to investigate the causation behind sadistic behavior, exclusively in the Abu Ghraib Prison scandal. She effectively does so by gathering information and research from professional psychologists and professors of psychology, specifically Herbert Kelman and Robert Okin (Szegedy-Maszak 76). She finds
The Implications of the Stanford Prison Experiment In 1971 Dr Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment in the basement of Stanford University. This involved imprisoning nine volunteers in a mock up of Stanford prison, which was policed by nine guards (more volunteers). These guards had complete control over the prisoners. They could do anything to the prisoners, but use physical violence.
“Our young research participants were not the proverbial “Bad Apples” in an otherwise good barrel. Rather, out experimental design ensured that they were initially good apples and were corrupted by the insidious power of the bad barrel, this prison (229).” Philip Zimbardo, author of The Lucifer Effect, created an experiment of twenty-four college age men. He randomly assigned these ordinary, educated, young men with a role as either Guard or Prisoner. He questions whether or not good people will do bad things if they are given the opportunity. After the experiment is complete, he begins to compare the situations that occurred in the Stanford Prison Experiment with real life situations in Abu Giraib and Guantanamo Bay Prison. He points out many similarities that parallel the Stanford Prison Experiment. In every situation depicted, there is a good person in a seemingly “bad barrel” – or a bad situation that brings bad actions out of a good person.
The guards began mistreating the prisoners, not physically, but emotionally and psychologically, taking advantage of the power and authority appointed to them by the experimenter (Zimbardo 109). Crimes of obedience and mistreatment of other human beings are not only found in Milgrim’s and Zimbardo’s experiments. In 1968, U.S. troops massacred over 500 villagers in My Lai.
In this study Zimbardo chose 21 participants from a pool of 75, all male college students, screened prior for mental illness, and paid $15 per day. He then gave roles. One being a prisoner and the other being a prison guard, there were 3 guards per 8 hour shift, and 9 total prisoners. Shortly after the prisoners were arrested from their homes they were taken to the local police station, booked, processed, given proper prison attire and issued numbers for identification. Before the study, Zimbardo concocted a prison setting in the basement of a Stanford building. It was as authentic as possible to the barred doors and plain white walls. The guards were also given proper guard attire minus guns. Shortly after starting the experiment the guards and prisoners starting naturally assuming their roles, Zimbardo had intended on the experiment lasting a fortnight. Within 36 hours one prisoner had to be released due to erratic behavior. This may have stemmed from the sadistic nature the guards had adopted rather quickly, dehumanizing the prisoners through verbal, physical, and mental abuse. The prisoners also assumed their own roles rather efficiently as well. They started to rat on the other prisoners, told stories to each other about the guards, and placated the orders from the guards. After deindividuaiton occurred from the prisoners it was not long the experiment completely broke down ethically. Zimbardo, who watched through cameras in an observation type room (warden), had to put an end to the experiment long before then he intended
Now sure, the Stanford prison guards didn’t go that far as the torture and abuse at Abu Ghraib but the torture and abuse towards the prisoners became worse by the day indicating they could have gone as far as Abu Ghraib. However, in both cases there are unusual punishments and cruelty. This was due to the authority allowing it, ordering it, just didn’t care or didn’t know. Like the Stanford Prison Experiment, Zimbardo didn’t do anything to stop the abuses at the mock prison but allowed it.
In the Lucifer effect, there were many questionable things that occurred involving the Stanford Prison Experiment. The Stanford Prison experiment, which was created by Philip Zimbardo himself, involved the division of young college age men to perform the task of guard or prisoner. He gave each job a particular uniform that they had to wear and minimal training, so that he could observe what the guards would do. He aimed to prove the hypothesis that good people are willing to do bad things if they are in certain situations.
In Abu Ghraib, the prisoners’ faces were covered with hoods and the prison was covered up with walls that made the prison an island where morality was no longer there due to the three traits that the soldier went through. To understand how individuals can kill innocent children, women, men, and elders, Philip G. Zimbardo did The Stanford prison experiment. In the book, Zimbardo highlighted three psychological truths. The first is that the world is full of both evil and good, the barrier between the two is absorbent, and angels and devils can switch.
The techniques used by the CIA and military in the wake of 2001 involved stress positions, strikes, sensory and sleep deprivation. These Enhanced Interrogation Techniques have been compared to torture and torture lite. While strikes, stress positions, and deprivation leave no lasting marks, they were found to constitute "cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment" in an investigation conducted by John Helgerson the Inspector General for the CIA (Jehl 2005).
In short, the movie The Ghost of Abu Ghraib is about military police becoming prison guards for the Abu Ghraib prison. They had to watch hundreds of detainees at once, which could have been very dangerous if they came together to attack the guards. There was some torture at this time, but things really started to get worst when military intelligence took control over the military police. The interrogation tactics became harsher and the military police were forced to become more involved in the interrogation processes. They were told to do whatever they had to do to keep the detainees awake at night, have them naked most of the time, put them in stressor positions, anything to get information out of them. The military police didn’t necessarily agree with everything intelligence was telling them to do, but they did it any ways because they had too, it
According to Cesare Lombroso, criminals commit crime not because of free will and rationale but because of their biology. The soldiers at Abu Ghraib or soldiers stationed at any base within any branch, each person must pass a physical medical exam. All the soldiers at Abu Ghraib were in boots camp for about 3 months. These are all soldiers who have been checked out to be stable men who are fit for the military. Psychoanalytic explanations are negative childhood experiences, undeveloped cognitive approach and lacking of moral development. Although these men could have had either of these but these men were driven by the hatred towards arabs and learned the aggression from their trainers. Zimbardo challenges Lombroso’s biological approach and the psychoanalytic explanations because he found that human behavior often depends on circumstance and the situation people are put in. As the student “guards” in the Zimbardo experiment and Abu Ghraib, they were given so much power and authority, that they easily and quickly abused it. This too occurred in Boys of Abu Ghraib. Jacks trainer told him that each block wass supposed to be stationed with two men, but they did not have enough men so Jack would have to stay in the block alone full of suspected terrorists. Jack was solely in charge of the whole entire block; no one was watching over him or giving him limits. He was actually encouraged by the other soldiers to torture the arabs. The theory of deviant places states that crime rates are influenced by kinds of places rather than kinds of people (Esposito, 2017) So, the environment which Jack was in which was dirty, dilapidated, and surrounded by “hajis” is a big factor on why Jack and the other soldiers committed these crimes. The soldiers learned this behavior and aggression at the prison because they were surrounded by
Bad system creates the bad person. This is the meaning of the lucifer effect. The lucifer effect was the research on and the situations that come with a bad environment. The situations that were used in this experiment were verbal abuse war experiences and environmental issues.An example would be in Abu gharbi “Cruelty became sexualised: one guard sodomised a male prisoner with a chemical light; another raped a female detainee. Bush, grandstanding in typical fashion after the event, vowed that the 'wrongdoers will be brought to justice”
“Men forced to undress and becomes in a rank. Some former prisoners report that beat them on genitals and a groin, forced to have oral sex and to suck off, beat the stun gun in erogenous places, stubs from cigarettes thrust into anuses. To detainees repeatedly threatened that they will be raped in the face of relatives, wives and daughters, and also their families threatened that, including and children too will be raped. Some men declared that proctal forced them bludgeons, and that they saw as governmental armies forced also children. One person declared that he saw rape of the boy in the face of the father. 40-year-old man saw as three officers of security service force the child.” [6]
Zimbardo, P.G. (2004, May, 25). Journalist interview re: Abu Ghraib prison abuses: Eleven answers to eleven questions. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford Univesity.