Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Daylight saving
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Daylight saving
I. Thesis Statement
Rather than fulfilling its original intent of energy conservation, Daylight Savings Time has not only become an unpopular, discombobulating nuisance but also a potential hazard to public safety and health.
II. Topic Sentence 1
Scientists have ascertained that DST results in sleep disruptions which could lead to serious health issues and potentially lethal ramifications.
a. Support
The body’s internal clock, commonly known as circadian rhythm, does not sync with the DST’s clock. This disconnect between the body’s clock and the DST’s clock can engender feelings of “restlessness, sleep disruption, and shorter sleep duration” (O’Connor).
b. Support (continue as needed)
Time change has been linked to increases in “heart attacks,
…show more content…
suicides, and accidents” (O’Connor). III. Topic Sentence 2 (continue as needed) Although DST decreases the number of traffic incidents and street crime in the spring, it could potentially increase the number of traffic accidents and the frequency of violent and property crimes in the fall.
a. Support
David Prerau claims that “another area of DST impact is crime reduction” (Prerau) as “crime [is] believed to be influenced by lighting” (Prerau). However, after DST ends, time shifts back an hour causing sunset to be earlier. If crime is affected by lighting conditions, then an earlier sunset would result in an increased crime rate.
b. Support (continue as needed)
The number of traffic accidents is likely to increase due to an earlier sunset as well as the sleep disruptions that are commonly associated with Daylight Saving Time.
IV. Topic Sentence 3 (continue as needed)
While DST’s conserves energy used to power businesses and industries, it is offset by an increased use of electricity from residential areas.
a. Support
According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, DST increases overall energy consumption by “approximately 1 percent” (Kotchen) and rises to 2-4 percent in the fall. The use of air conditioning, television, lighting, and other appliances causes the residential energy demand to
rise. b. Support (continue as needed) In Indiana households alone, DST results in “$9 million per year in increased electricity bills” (Kotchen). V. Concluding Statement Daylight Savings Time has more consequences than benefits and the most sensical course of action would be to abolish or ameliorate it.
Ben Hogan, a famous golfer, once said, “ the only thing a golfer needs is more daylight”. Daylight saving time not only impacts the world’s golf games, it also affects the economy, outdoor activities and comes with many health concerns.Daylight saving time(also know as DST) was used as a way to save energy and have more natural light in the summertime, but it was as affected and it also came with many consequences to the countries and states that still use this time. It was first used in the USA in 1918 and has been on and off for many years , but now DST is used seven months out of the year. There are two times during the year we change the clocks. The first Sunday in March, we “spring forward” with the clocks and the second Sunday in November we “fall back” one hour. However, daylight-saving time should be abolished from the rest of the world that uses this time throughout the year.
Daylight savings time has been something that individuals born post World War I have always had implemented in their lives. Many people never really consider the point of daylight savings time until it rolls around twice a year nor do they realize the original purpose. There are approximately 70 countries out of 196 that observe daylight savings time, at least in a portion of the country. Daylight savings time has had many changes throughout the history of it, but is it time to move on? Although there may be advantages such as more natural light, but disadvantages such as the disruptions with our circadian rhythms outweigh the advantages.
While points, claims, and statistics may be found within all of the sources used for the research, the sheer amount of referenced studies and works within the “Sleep-Wake” paper lends weight to it’s usefulness as a reliable source. One of the otherfactor of sleep and its affect within the college community. Three sources varying in criteria and usefulness were found that related to this subject and were studied. sources, “College Students try to Cheat Sleep Needs”, a college newspaper, offers basic facts and elementary assumptions such that could be found within any biology textbook or encyclopedia. These references are to such things as sleep cycles and sub stages and the general consequences of an out of balance sleep cycle. The study from the Biological Rhythm Research writers, however, hints at previous studies and findings that “several factors, such as social and academic demands, part-time jobs, [...] affect the sleep-wake cycle of college students.” but then only states the findings of a particular study, and does so in...
Daylight saving time transitions often lead to disrupted sleep cycles. When springing forward, the body needs to adjust to going to sleep earlier, which may leave people restless at night and cause sleepiness the next day. The human body does not follow the schedule for daylight savings and does not easily adjust to it (Source E). In addition, some studies have “ruggerted links between time change and increases in heat attacks, suicides, and accidents” (Source E). It is evident that daylight savings isn’t right for the body which requires a different sleep
Daylight savings time, also known as DST, is not detrimental and the impact it makes is beneficial. Although some may insist that the time change causes their mental and physical capability to decrease, they completely disregard the other factors that can contribute. It would be a waste of time to pass a bill against DST just because it occasionally confuses some people. It is advantageous to businesses, the wellbeing of individuals, and the environment.
It was believed that this was caused from an increased rate of air conditioning use due to more daylight during a day. Another argument against DST is related health and safety, where studies show that when DST begins in the fall, pedestrian fatalities caused by cars increase at a high rate immediately after clocks are set back. Another study showed that a week after the end of DST, 227 pedestrians were involved in fatalities, as opposed to the week before DST resulted in 65 pedestrians being killed. Overall, it is very difficult for drivers and pedestrians to get adjusted to time changes whether it is forward or
Source C states that roughly “forty to fifty megawatt hours” of electricity, during daylight saving time, is saved nationwide. Sunlight provides more recreational time and decreases the use of electronic appliances such as a TV. This leads to a more active society and advances people's immune systems. By getting out of the house, even to go shopping, an individual is exposed to more bacteria therefore exercising their body and immune system. Daylight saving time provides civilians with more active opportunities by conserving energy inside one’s
Daylight Saving Time is defined as a “system for uniformly advancing clocks, so as to extend daylight hours during conventional waking time in the summer months” (Britannica). It is observed in over 70 countries around the world, where our social clock loses an hour in the spring and gains an hour in the fall. While it is a common practice now, there has been discussion of getting rid of it and staying on one time year round. Though some people may disagree with this idea, there is still a problem among people that agree; they cannot agree on whether or not to be on Daylight Saving Time or Standard Time year round. Daylight Saving Time, however, has many negative effects on both physical and mental health, as well as the economy, which outweigh
Lack of visibility puts someone on edge because their perceived sense of danger increases. Both of these factors can lead someone to do something at night that they wouldn’t do during the day. The shift in time due to DST better aligns daylight with people’s normal hours of activity. People returning from work, for example, can do so when it is still light. All of this helps explain a Department of Transportation study that found that “violent crime in Washington, D.C., was reduced by 10 to 13 percent during periods of daylight saving time” (Prerau 1).
Twice a year, we change the time on our clocks. In the spring we adjust it forward one hour and in the fall we set it back. It is supposed to help us function better. The question is, do we really need daylight saving time? Does the time change influence us for the better or worse?
Important public policy issues have arisen in our modern 24-hour society, where it is crucial to weigh the value of sleep versus wakefulness. Scientific knowledge about sleep is currently insufficient to resolve the political and academic debates raging about how much and when people should sleep. These issues affect almost everybody, from the shift worker to the international traveler, from the physician to the policy maker, from the anthropologist to the student preparing for an exam.
That extra hour of sleep is what everyone longs for; and daylight savings has proven to give schoolchildren, and employees that extra time to delve into their deepest dreams, without having to worry about being late for school or work. However, that loss in one hour of sleep can be effective, in causing cranky mornings, which has also been credited to daylight savings time. This love-hate relationship with this event has raised questions about its overall validity in regulating lives. This exercise of setting back clocks, and moving them forward one hour have been proven to be ineffective in overall human consumption, and instead, has been credited for developing negative effects.
Instilling this new way of energy usage into off-grid communities will inevitably increase the state of living for those in cities and other well-populated areas. The change to renewable energy sources could drastically lower the pollutants currently being dispersed into the atmosphere by coal mines and other harmful power options, increasing the supply of renewable energy would allow us to replace carbon-intensive energy sources and significantly reduce U.S. global warming emissions. a 25 percent by 2025 national renewable electricity standard would lower power plant CO2 emissions 277 million metric tons annually by 2025—the equivalent of the annual output from 70 typical (600 MW) new coal plants (“Benefits of Renewable Energy Use”). Electricity production accounts for more than one-third of U.S. global warming emissions, with the majority generated by coal-fired power plants.
There are many other was to increase safety and help those that work the night shift but just small step with any way will increase safety at every turn. The key issue to have a routine and eat properly.
Household energy conservation is a very practical and realistic approach to conserving energy within our society. US households consume a tremendous amount of natural gas as well as electric energy. It has been calculated that the amount of energy consumed within the US increased exponentially from about 1850 to 1975. If energy continued to increase at this rate, we would be experiencing severe energy shortages in our current society. Luckily, steps towards conservation, including various energy regulations, have curbed that growth somewhat, brining the predicted 160 Qbtu/yr for the year 2000 down to around 93.8 Qbtu/yr by the year 1996. However, household energy usage is still a major issue as households consume about 38% of the total consumed energy and contribute greatly to natural gas consumption and issues such as global warming. Therefore, it is important that people understand how we use energy in the household and what steps can be taken to conserve that energy.