Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Emotional effects of spanking on children
Corporal Punishment: Merits And Demerits
Corporal Punishment: Merits And Demerits
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Why Spanking Your Children is Wrong An obvious but also necessary essay by me. A child's bond with their mother is often something that never becomes broken, but when such a strong relationship begins to crumble by the hands of a parent who doesn't have the cognitive ability to understand the rights and wrongs of discipline you begin to see more anxiety, depression, and trust issues in these children. These issues are going to carry on throughout their adulthood causing more problems than what would've been caused by their action beforehand. A myriad of research has been done in the scientific field pertaining to the short, mid and long term effects of corporal punishment. These effects are things along the line of reduction in gray matter of the brain, a barrier amongst the child, their parent and a social barrier due to the anxiety, it's also an ineffective method of discipline. Everyone's goal as a parent is to have intelligent children, but if there's a lack …show more content…
of gray matter it's going to be much more difficult for them to be a genius all across the board. Although it may seem harmless at the time of action, spanking a child can cause many developmental issues along with intelligence testing, learning abilities along with memory, muscular control, and emotional expression/identification. (Molly C, Psychology Today.) When you spank your child is also enforces that into their education, making them correlate punishment with education which will make it hard for them to absorb material. Kids have it hard enough with today's educational requirements. Becoming a social butterfly is no easy task but at least a child should try. When corporal punishment is added to this mix it makes it harder for those children to react correctly to social behaviors. These kids will always be on alert trying to do the right thing in order for no one to punish them or they will not know if someone is mistreating them. The relationship with a parent can be severely crippled once the child puts up their barrier due to the distaste for pain as they make mistakes. This metaphorical barrier can carry on throughout adulthood as all of us have probably seen first hand. It's been often seen that spanking is extraordinarily ineffective with effects that are more detrimental than the issue you were supposed to be treating.
If that was the case in the first place a child would stop afterwards, which I have yet to see so stop taking your anger out on the child and put it into something else because it's obviously not working. The best thing to do here would be to punish them with material items, not allowing the child to play Xbox for the rest of the day (and sticking to it) or making them go to bed earlier. These methods have shown results and also have no long lasting effects. Morally we should all know this isn't a respectable action even if you're desperate. Over thirty countries have banned any form of corporal punishment, leaving the US to be one of the very few still allowing such a monstrous act take place. The children in these areas also tend to be impressively intelligent most of them even being bilingual along with far less
aggression. Today there have been facts placed into this essay but whether your moral barometer allows you to believe it's right even after a lengthy essay explaining why it's wrong is up to you. If a child with no social skills, learning disabilities and a bad relationship to you is your ideal child then by all means ruin America's future. I just have one question though, at what point do you cross the line of punishment into abuse?
Generally speaking there Is a difference between spanking aka discipline and child abuse. If a child is told after every mistake what was wrong and why they're being punished it does not damage their mental health. The child will no longer look at their parents with the eyes of distrust. Comparatively spanking is not a positive action so it will not held positive results unless it is accompanied by an explanation as to why one was punished. In fact ,I have four siblings, the eldest boy was spanked for his actions. He ended up being engaged in dishonest activities, and has anger issues. Whereas the youngest boy was barley spanked and he never was involved in any crimes and similarly has a very calm demeanor. Also spanking is just one action
Per Reporter: April's mother (Heather's) boyfriend (Christopher) spanked her with a belt when Heather goes to work. It is unknown what kind of belt was used. It is unknown how often Christopher spanked her. April has no bruise or mark. April has not told Heather about the spanked because even times she tried to tell Heather. Heather and Christopher are always fighting and arguing with each other. Heather and Christopher hit each other. One time Christopher hit Heather until her arms, face, and leg was bleeding. Christopher leaves April and her brother (Jeremy) alone when Heather is at work. Christopher has his friend (unknown) at home all times of the night. Christopher and friends played loud music that has cursing in it. April stayed in her
Holden (2002) reviewed Gershoff’s (2002) meta-analyses of eighty-eight (88) studies and noted that there were both positive and negative outcomes associated with the punishment of spanking. According to Gershoff’s (2002) analysis, the one positive outcome was immediate compliance by the child (Holden, 2002). This result was found to be consistent in five (5) studies. Immediate compliance was defined as the child complying to the parents directive within five (5) seconds. In stark contrast, there were four (4) negative outcomes. The analysis showed a negative effect on the quality of the parent child relationship, the child’s mental health, the child’s perception of being a victim of physical child abuse, and also impacted aggression in adulthood (Holden, 2002).
Did you know that over half of the population spanks their children? The idea of using spanking as a punishment has raised controversy among parents. Spanking is the use of an open hand to strike someone and many parents want it to become illegal. While spanking has some down sides, it should remain legal because making it illegal would be difficult to enforce, and there are already laws against child abuse.
Many authorities and psychologists believe that spanking breaks a child's spirit and only leads to violence. They think that it causes the child to become depressed, angry or hostile and they have conducted many studies to prove these things. This type of harsh punishment occurs often, but it is called child abuse. There is a great difference between abusing a child and properly disciplining a child. "One is an act of love; the other is an act of hostility, and they are as different as night and day" (Dobson 35).
... violence of corporal punishment. In addition, corporal punishment can and often does become abuse when parents are especially angry or stressed (Barnett, Miller-Perrin, Perrin 292).
“Stolen people, stolen dream” is the brutality faced by numerous, vulnerable, gullible children in the black market around the world even in the admirable United States. Trafficking of children is the modern day slavery, the act of recruiting, harboring, transporting, providing, or obtaining a person for compelled labor or commercial sex acts through the use of force, fraud, or coercion. More than ever, it has become a lucrative method that is trending in the underground economy. A pimp can profit up to $150,000 per children from age 4-12 every year, as reported by the UNICEF. Also, according to the International Labor Organization statistics, “There are 20.9 million victim of human trafficking globally, with hundreds of thousands in the United
There are so many things that I have never found really interesting to me or at least something that could make me want to try and change it. I still don’t understand why people want to hurt kids. This is not something that should be a norm in our culture, but it is. This should be changed instead of just letting it happen sure it is going to be hard to charge, but there are still things that we can do to help kids that have gone through it and their parents. It also does depend on who abused them then they can go to jail. There are still things that we do not have a real understanding as to what sexual abuse is in general. It is not a well-known topic unless some has been abused. We assume that the victim is to blame them for what happened to them, but it is not their fault. We blame people because we do not want to see the perpetrator as the one who should be in trouble. In this case we do not have the knowledge as to what sexual abuse really is. The definition of sexually abuse is a sex act that is non-consensual and this could be anything. This does not mean that consensual sex is
In western society, there has been debate in recent years over the use of corporal punishment for children in general, and increased attention has been given to the concept of "positive parenting" where good behavior is encouraged and rewarded
Several forms of emotional damage have been associated with physical punishment in children such as confusion, aggressive behaviors, and mental illnesses. These are all signs of abuse or to be more specific a parent that did not fully understand the limitations of the biblical approach. On the other hand, are these factual claims? Not even research can back these claims up. Afifi, T. O., Monta, N. P., Dasiewicz, P., MacMillan, H. L., & Sareen, J. (2012) authors of a journal called Physical Punishment and Mental Disorders: Results From a Nationally Representative US Sample clearly state that research is flawed and no findings can be proven to show a link between physical punishment and mental disorders. Parents may have heard “spare the rod, spoil the child” but there is more behind that saying. The Bible does not say to use excessive force it tells a parent to use their love and words of knowledge to correct a child.
People may argue on whether you step in when you see bad parenting, which is an excellent idea. Others may agree that you should let the parent be parent, regardless of if their doing a good job or not. We always see videos on social media or parent disciplining their children too harshly, abusing them, or more horrifying and disgustingly children being molested. Sometimes things may not be as bad as this, but under the circumstances someone should be able to step in and take action. I have three real life situations in which I feel like someone should step in and take action. I think in my sister’s situation, my mom’s situation, and my aunt situation someone should step in. I’ll explain why on each situation.
The first thing to look at is the immediate effect physical force has on the child. Seasoned child care provider, author, and host of the international hit television series Supernanny, Jo Frost points out in her latest book that “inflicting pain on a child shuts down the good-judgement part of the brain which then reverts to basic primitive processing, fight-or-flight.” Instead of the child processing what they did that was wrong and learning from the experience, the child’s instincts are instead frantically attempting to protect itself from pain. As many parents who implement corporal punishment will attest, the effect is an immediate halt of the unwanted behaviour. As Frost pointed out, the child, while compliant, is not having a positive learning experience. Without trust and learning, it is likely the child will try harder not to get caught which in turn, creates distance in the parent/ child relationship. While there are plenty of people quick to explain just how “fine” they turned out, there are plenty more who can testify how a swat on the bottom can intensify to a sore rear end, escalate to welts on the back, and in some cases become bruises and bloodied noses. Duke University professors Jennifer Lansford and Kenneth Dodge concluded from
Alayna Peterson Mrs. Stevens Expository Writing 16 January 2018 Why Children Kill Their Parents The act of parricide (killing of parents) is a daily event in the United States. A statistic on psychologytoday.com says from 1977-1986, more than 300 parents were killed each year. These children are most often abused/neglected and felt as if they had no way out. Useful research comparing the thoughts of those that had killed their parents was done by Paul Mones, a Los Angeles attorney who specializes in defending adolescent parricide offenders, shows that more than 90 percent had been abused by their parents. These children have no signs of severe mental illness or delinquent behavior.
Child abuse refers to lack of care or any type of emotional, physical or sexual mistreatment that results in emotional damage or physical injury to a child or a youth. In most countries, children are considered to be anyone below 18 years of age. Child abuse can occur directly by harming a child or indirectly by failing to prevent the child from any form of harm or injury. Child abuse can occur either in the family set up, in the community set up or in an institution such as a school. Also, children can be abused by adults or by other children or by people who know them or people who are complete strangers to them.
Licenses are mandatory for the use of guns, cars and operating heavy machinery, yet there is no license involving parenting, when children are perhaps the biggest responsibility. People who are physically, mentally or financially unfit to raise children can still do so because they don’t require a license. Every child deserves to have a decent upbringing in a suitable environment therefore, licensing those who wish to raise children should be compulsory. Parenting licenses would control some of the population. According to Statistics New Zealand, “NZ’s population is expected to reach 5 million in 2020.”