Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parents responsible for children's actions
Parents responsible for children's actions
Should parents be held responsible for their actions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Parents responsible for children's actions
Licenses are mandatory for the use of guns, cars and operating heavy machinery, yet there is no license involving parenting, when children are perhaps the biggest responsibility. People who are physically, mentally or financially unfit to raise children can still do so because they don’t require a license. Every child deserves to have a decent upbringing in a suitable environment therefore, licensing those who wish to raise children should be compulsory. Parenting licenses would control some of the population. According to Statistics New Zealand, “NZ’s population is expected to reach 5 million in 2020.” A population increase results in a greater pressure on resources. Energy sources from wood and oil would become scarcer, CO2 levels would increase contributing to global warming, threatening people with dislocation. There would be less farmland and forestry due to the need for houses and land. Parental licensing may cause people to feel more responsibility, they could make better …show more content…
You can stop driving a car or using a gun but you cannot quite raising a child. Donor and surrogate parents must provide medical history, while adoptive parents must prove the child will be looked after. However, there is no test for biological parents and there isn’t much difference between them, either way the parent/caregiver is responsible for the child. Bad parenting like the absence of car licenses or gun licenses can be extremely harmful considering the innocence and vulnerability of a child. Parental behaviour can be influential, studies have shown “neglected children are 25% more likely to experience problems such as delinquency, teen pregnancy, low academic achievement, drug use and mental health problems.” We don’t want these kids to be the future. Parental licensing would minimise the chances of these types of kids growing up to be the future, by preventing irresponsible parents from raising
In Hugh Lafollette’s paper, “Licensing Parents” he talks about the need for government licensing of parents. His argument states that for any activity that is harmful to others, requires competence, and has a reliable procedure for determining competence, should require licensing by the government. This argument relates to parenting because it can be harmful to children, requires competence to raise those children, and we can assume that a reliable procedure can be formulated. Therefore, parenting should require licensing by the government. I agree with Lafollette and shall focus on supporting him by addressing the most practical objections: There is no reliable procedure for identifying competent parents and it is impossible to reasonably enforce parent regulations. I shall address these objections and their reasoning, followed by responses that Lafollette and myself would most likely have, thereby refuting the objections.
Guns do belong in schools and prospective parents should be required to obtain a license before having kids. These are the dominant themes present in Jamie O'Meara's "Gun, Sex, and Education" and Janice Turner's "Should We Need a License to Be a Parent?" respectively. O'Meara argues that just like sex education arms the youth with knowledge, protecting them from irresponsible promiscuous behavior, gun education would serve the same purpose with respect to violence and guns. Similarly, Turner calls for new legislation but in an entirely different arena. She believes that in order to become parents, adults or non-adults for that matter, should meet a certain required standard and obtain a license in order to enter the most important profession of all: parenting. In order to develop these arguments, both writers utilize the general rhetorical strategies of comparison and argument. However, there is one key difference between the approaches taken to the development of the arguments. O'Meara's article has successfully employs ethical (ethos), emotional (pathos) and logical (logos) appeal whereas Turner's article takes a predominantly rational appeal (logos). Though both articles do an excellent job of conveying their points, all things considered, O'Meara's attempt at presenting a well balanced approach appealing to logic, emotion and ethics is more successful than Turner's attempt at presenting a solely logical argument.
There’s a high rate of homelessness among the children who was been in the foster care but age out. Many children are going to the foster care because of many tragedies they already had before they even understand what is life all about. Fortunately, for them, there are some people who try to help them out and give them a second shot at life. And having a child of my own gives me a full understanding how much a parent 's guidance and love mean to their lives and I am trying to introduce adoptuskids.org to help raise awareness of homelessness and adoption to all the people and hoping that the children in the foster care system will get a lot of help, support, and love.
Many individuals are taking the process of process of parental licensing into their own hands, despite their contributions being made up in mind only, however, it is thought that counts. One respective person believes that a restriction on having children should begin at the earliest stage of one’s life: birth. As soon as a child is born, doctors should “go in and turn off their spickets” (McRedmond). In the later stages of life, this would prevent several cases of teen pregnancies, seeing as though it would be an impossibility for women to get pregnant. Then, when a women eventually becomes ready enough to think about having children, they should go through a testing process, perhaps similar to Sherman’s ideas of interviews, writing, and demonstrations of capability. If they pass, they “get their spickets turned
Single moms are the most affected and providing childcare on campus is very beneficial to them. More than 4 million women attend two-year public institutions or community colleges, and more than 1 million of them are mothers. Many student mothers struggle to stay enrolled all the way through graduation. Most of them are more likely to drop out of school, and the reason is because most often there is no affordable or available childcare and the students have limited financial resources. The average daycare center cost for an infant is higher than a year’s tuition and fees at a public college. It makes affordable on-campus child care a necessary provision for students. Childcare on campus helps to contribute to the learning
Firstly, parental licensing invades our right to reproduce. We have control over what we do to our bodies, so if we want to reproduce, we can do so without government intervention. Some may argue that our rights are not absolute rights, so our right to have children is no exception. Consider our right to freedom of speech. Although we are free to speak our mind, we are restricted from hate speech and slander. The same goes for our right of life. We are equal in that we all have the right to live, but killing someone as self defense is admissible. Even so, our right to have children is inherently different from our right to free speech and right to life because procreation is our biological right. As I mentioned earlier, we are using our own body to do what we want. To say the least, we do not need licenses to engage in sex, so it makes no sense to require one for
Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. Adoption recently has caused a hot-spot debate in Australia . Mr Rudd just argued that we should maintain the policy but I don’t agree with him. I am sure many of you are not satisfied with the current situation because we all clear this is not a great one. Adoption is so important because it is a way to change children’s lives. This debate is not about me and Mr Rudd; it’s about you and these children so you should make the best choice. For too long this policy has been disadvantaged to the children who are adopted or going to be adopted and those foster families. It’s the time to change. Relaxing the regulation of adoption within Australia and from overseas will be one of the liberal party’s aiming next term if I get your support. And let me tell you why choosing to relax adoption’s regulation is stepping up in the right direction to change.
Wayne and Kate is a middle-aged couple who have been together for many years. Their life was great before expanding their family. They used to go out every weekend and splurge. That changed when they had children, who were a real joy adding meaning to their lives but they proof to be financially taxing. Over time, Wayne and Kate had two children, who now are five, and eight years old. Because Wayne and Kate both work, they had to utilize childcare. Childcare proof to be expensive, however Wayne’s job offered childcare reimbursement. Otherwise, their finances would be too tight for the couple to cover costs. Wayne had a good position with the company, unfortunately his employer sold out to another company, which offered a different benefit package.
Issuing a license will decrease the US population significantly, discouraging idea of sex in the fear of accidentally producing a children and having to go through the hassle of applying for a license that they may or may not be able to obtain. It can also encourage safer sex practices like birth control and condom usage, which is not necessarily a bad thing. On top of that, it will also cause a lot of traffic in the beginning process of issuing license for already existing parents which will take a long time before all parenting license will be put into practice, which can be a good thing because this will create lot of new jobs which will lead to more spending and boosting the economy but is time consuming. Another question that will arise when applying for a license that LaFollete did not cinsuder is what if the parent are not able to obtain a license? What will happen to the children? LaFollete can call for the children to be put into an orphanage to be put up to adoption by better parents or into a social service program but the potential flaw in that argument can be that the
For years there have been an excessive number of children in and out of the foster system. Quite a few children have succeeded; however, other children have not. A few children have looked to drugs, alcohol and violence to cope with what they have gone through and/or what they are currently going through. A number of those children ended up in a juvenile detention center or prison for breaking the law. Foster parents are desperately needed to help these children succeed in life and make it through this terrible time.
Their hearts sank as they watched the child they had come to know and love as their own, be taken away by strangers that they had never met until today. As the CPS worker spoke with Mary she explained, “If you had just logged in her injuries acquired during the accident and told us what medicines you had used, this would not have happened.” Mary thought to herself “it was just a scrape… just a tiny little cut…” Many parents all over the world have gone through hardships like this one. If they even got to adopt at all. Many of the rules, regulations and prices agencies have come up with have been causing people all over the world to deter from adopting.
Every day there are children who are either in foster care, or group homes, who have received maltreatment at least once over the duration of their stay. Unfortunately, for most of those children, it hasn’t and will not be a onetime thing. The Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect reported 15,980 child maltreatment investigations across Canada in the fall of 2008, which has increased significantly, whereas in 1988 there were 7,633 investigations. Child Welfare, is a set of government services designed to protect children and encourage family stability. Such services are done through the use of investigations into alleged child abuse, foster care, adoption services, and services to provide support for those families who
Foster Children who are emancipated out of foster care are in danger of becoming homeless because Foster Homes are allowing many unfit parents to adopt, they are emancipated before they can find a job that can support them, and they are not being taught the skills to avoid homelessness.
Poverty is “the state of one who lacks a usual or socially acceptable amount of money or material possessions” (Merriam-Webster dictionary, 2015); in other words, struggling to provide a comfortable living style. It is the cause of family stress and many other problems, especially for the children. Millions of people around the world are struggling with poverty; families suffering to provide enough food seem to be growing in numbers. According to the United States Census Bureau, the poverty rate was highest in the 1960s and decreased greatly in the 1970s. However, it is now slowly starting to increase again. Recently released census data by the Bureau showed that one in five people are living in poverty (Census Bureau, 2014). Poverty is even
Women’s and men’s would have to have a license at the age when they have a job and can support themselves before they become parents or after having a child if they want to stay with the children. This is because not everyone has the budgets to take care of a baby. Also a lot of people just have a baby to get benefits from the government. Although parents nowadays claim that having a child is a natural part of every human’s life is clear there are those who disagree with these. According to family who are against this state that everyone should be parents even if they don’t have knowledge. In other words, these people believe that everyone should be parents without a license. I disagree with this parent’s view that everyone should become a parent whenever they want because there have been cases showing that some people mistreat their kids or abuse of them emotional, sexually and physically. Parents who disagree with this idea are right to argue that having a child is a natural part of human’s life, but they exaggerate when they claim that everyone should have a kid even if they don’t have the budgets. This is a problem because there are many kids suffering because some parents abuse the children or the parents are not mentally and economically stable to afford the best care for the kid. Also, having a child is too expensive and not everyone has the amount to give a better life to the child. Ultimately, what must be kept in mind is that not