More handpicked essays just for you.
The refugee crisis in the world composition
Conflict and political repression refugees
Background of the Syrian refugee crisis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The refugee crisis in the world composition
TJ Faber
Volpe
Speech and Debate
30 September, 2016
Debate Entry Essay: “Resolved: The obligation to provide safe haven for refugees should outweigh a government's right to control its borders.”
“Refugees”. It’s as if ever time a person turns on the TV or browses the internet in the present day, there’s some news story about people seeking the safety of living in another country because their own is in disaster. Presently, the Syrian refugee crisis, where millions of Syrians are being displaced due to a civil war in their country, is at the headline of the national newspaper, but refugee displacement has been an issue for decades. The most notable crisis in the world’s history was at the end of World War II, where people escaping Hitler’s regime had to find a new home. It was at this time that Western Europe adopted its negative stance on immigration, turning their backs not just on legitimate people wanting to move into their country, but also on refugees from other countries. Their policies have stayed mostly the same up
…show more content…
Unfortunately for lawmakers that prioritize their own citizen’s safety in the short term over the safety of those displaced by conflict, they will be missing out on the massive long-term benefits of refugees, including but not limited to a safer country for all citizens, a large economic
One of the more disconcerting aspects of Bill C-31 is the newly adopted Designated Country of Origin (DCO) legislation which has permanently labeled particular nations as “safe”. Consequently, individuals claiming refugee status who originate from these countries no longer have the same rights and privileges afforded to their refugee counterparts from other nations (“Overview of C-31,” 2013). In turn, this has led to a dichotomy between those who view this change as necessary in order to diminish the influx of embellished and falsified refugee claims and those who view this policy as discriminatory and prejudiced towards people originating from certain nations.
An extraordinary 65.3 million Refugees have been displaced around the world. In 2015 Australia took 12,000 of them. But where are Australians placing these Refugees? Australia is deporting these Refugees to a third country, either on Manus or Nauru Island. These Islands have reports of inhumane and cruel treatment towards Refugees For those who aren’t fully aware of what Refugees are; they are people whom come to Australia illegally without the appropriate visas. They cannot obtain these visas because of the reasons they are fleeing their country … their Government. None the less it should be the Australian Government they fear. The concepts of refugees are kept hidden away from us by our own Government in reflection of their Governments own self-interest. This tragedy is classified as a modern day witch hunt.
The United States fails to protect its borders, while Australia sacrifices human rights in order to do so. Traditionally, first-world countries and their citizens assist those in less developed countries. Many of the island nations in the south pacific suffer from poverty and frequent natural disasters. Most would agree that, as the most developed country in the region, it is Australia’s responsibility to advocate for human rights and contribute to humanitarian efforts for the island nations. To its credit, Australia normally satisfies this role. However, when asylum-seekers come by boat, Australia draws a forceful line. The United States is also tasked with protecting its borders, but takes a more appropriate approach. In 2012, the PEW research
With the recent Paris attacks and rumors of foreboding ISIS attacks, the topic of immigration comes up quite often in conversations. Topics such as how the immigrants should be dealt with, what exactly are the benefits and/or detriments of immigration, Donald Trump’s immigration plan, et cetera are usually discussed. With immigration gradually becoming a trending issue, various people have expressed their thoughts through means like social media and news sites. Joining this movement, this will be another text on the topic of immigration. The benefits of immigration will be presented, false information will be proven wrong, and why some people oppose immigration will be explained and discussed. Immigration should be widely accepted rather than
Refugees are not the criminals as Spain and Morocco have seen them in recent years. They must revise their immigration system in order to legally allow more refugees to gain asylum and ease the stress on other European countries, not only for humanitarian reasons, but also for the entire stability of Europe. If immigrants flood into only a few countries those will be heavily impacted and disrupt the country's economy, government, and market. If more countries welcome refugees it will ease the stress for all of Europe by keeping stability as well as reducing the number of injuries and death that many immigrants face today. Europe and the rest of the world needs to address the immigration crisis as a whole, vowing to protect lives and resolve
Debates on EU migration policy have been catapulted to the front of the policy-making scene several weeks ago by the hand of the EU Greek council presidency, calling for a unified asylum system, resource pooling, and a more coordinated management of border controls. There is people trying to sneak out through the EU borders in Greece, attempts to jump Melilla´s fence on behalf Sub-Saharan migrants, and everyone became acquainted with the Lampedusa tragedy already and the everyday migration dripping in the Mediterranean Sea. Apparently, those who try to break the EU borders are thousands of millions. Apparently, they are terrorist and people who seek to destroy the fairy-tale EU socio/economic life. Apparently, The situation is overwhelming, and all those undocumented migrants threaten the well-being of the EU citizenship. Member states are technically committed under the Lisbon Treaty to develop ‘common’ migration and asylum policies. However, in practice, it seems to be ruled by an “Everyman for himself” principle: Southern governments claim for a common EU approach -and more resources and funding- to “combat illegal migration”. Northern countries complaint about the overwhelming number of Syrian asylum seekers and that the protection of the Mediterranean Borders is not a priority and a matter of national security. Any action should should be driven with intergovernmental character. Central EU MS agree with that statement, claiming that this is exclusively a border management problem, and this is a matter of securitization “Fortress Europe” to protect their citizenship and economy.
Immigration is a complex and divisive topic worldwide because there has been a sharp increase in the numbers of immigrants and asylum seekers. A record of 107,500 migrants in July 2015, have caused European countries increased pressure on infrastructure and resources required to accommodate them. This crisis is showing no signs of resolving with Germany expecting as many as 750,000 asylum seekers in 2015.
Question - Discuss the history of and impact that asylum seekers and refugees have had on Australia’s culture and its economy. Reflect on how Australia’s government contributes to the welfare of asylum seekers and refugees.
Another casual night: the air is sticky, and the water is scarce, all throughout the country the sound of gunshots are ringing through the air. For most people, this “casual” night is beyond their wildest imagination, but for Syrians it is an ongoing nightmare. Faced with the trauma of a civil war, Syrian refugees seek protection and a more promising future than the life they currently live in their oppressive country. Many seek refuge in other Middle East countries like Turkey and Jordan, but others search for hope in the icon of freedom, the United States of America. However, in America, there is an ongoing debate about whether or not Syrian refugees should be accepted. America needs to accept the Syrian refugees because if they do not, the
Eskinder Negash, a former director of the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement, said, “Every time a refugee rents an apartment, every time a refugee shops for food, there’s some income coming in for the city and going into the tax base." He is now a senior vice president of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI), a network of groups that help resettle refugees around the country. “There’s a new realization that refugees can be an economic engine for some of these small communities.” So not only do refugees help to fill in vacant jobs but they also ‘give back’ in a manner of speaking. Many Americans believe that refugees are hurting the economy because they are “Stealing Jobs” but what most people neglect to acknowledge is the fact that the money the Refugees earn goes back to the American economy just like anyone else's money. They purchase common goods from businesses who profit from that transaction and taxes are taken out of their money as well. As far as economics go, a refugee’s money is just as good as an American’s
But this current crisis happens to coincide with a moment of fear about national identity in both the US and Europe.Taking in large numbers of refugees requires accepting that those refugees might bring changes to a nation's identity or culture. That change is often beneficial not just for the refugees but for the host countries as well. Better food! New cultures! But immigration, especially on a larger scale, can also feel scary to people. When their communities change in small but important ways that can feel like neighborhoods and communities that were once designed for people like them are now interested in catering to someone else. And that is the real problem: This crisis has come at a time when many people in wealthy countries already felt tremendously threatened by immigration, and by the idea that their towns, communities, and cultures are changing in ways that feel uncomfortable or scary.
It was only a few weeks ago that the Syrian refugee issue was discussed. Many Americans have debated the issue at hand. The Syrian refugees have had a great effect on the presidential election of 2016. Both sides of the debate have convincing evidence to support their claim, but I have had a hard time choosing my side. Many fear that Isis will come with the refugees, but there is no way to be sure. In my opinion, the Syrian refugees should be allowed to come to the United States, first of all the United States promote racial equality, second Isis is already here, and third these people are not all extremists sure maybe some but not all.
Between January and November of this year, more than 750,000 migrants have been estimated crossing into the EU’s borders, compared to only 280,000 in the whole year during 2014 (www.bbc.com). This influx of refugees and asylum seekers from the Middle East has become a heavy burden on European Union policy makers. Many state leaders have opposing viewpoints and varying solutions to the crisis that is plaguing their region, and as a result there has been little to no action taken to solve this ever growing problem. This crisis should serve as a prime example of global cooperation, and it should highlight the ability to come together internationally and deal with important problems that affect all individuals. The solution to the refugee crisis will forever stand as a precedent for how the world deals with humanitarian issues in the future.
Refugees, like all people, have the right to live free and have a better future with many opportunities. In
Since 2011, Syrian refugees have been fleeing their country and looking for safety in places like Turkey. There is a great global debate on the solution to this refugee crisis involving as many as 20 independent countries plus the European Union. The United States is caught in a debate of its own on whether to take in Syrian refugees because of a conflict of domestic safety and global humanitarian obligation. By analyzing the historical background of the United States regarding Jewish, Hungarian, and Cuban refugees, there are distinct similarities and differences between the political decisions, domestic response, and overall effectiveness of refugee policy compared to the current Syrian Refugee