Immigration Crisis In The United States

GIVING MONEY TO COUNTRIES TO ACCEPT MIGRANTS-

Immigration is a complex and divisive topic worldwide because there has been a sharp increase in the numbers of immigrants and asylum seekers. A record of 107,500 migrants in July 2015, have caused European countries increased pressure on infrastructure and resources required to accommodate them. This crisis is showing no signs of resolving with Germany expecting as many as 750,000 asylum seekers in 2015.

This, however, is not only strictly a European problem. Some of the causes of immigration from developing countries have been very different and not just about bankruptcy and the economy. The war in Syria has made over 4 million people flee the country and 7.6 million are internally

displaced, living in refugee camps. A lot of those who fled haven’t attempted the very long and dangerous journey to asylum, but instead stayed as close to their homes as possible, some examples are Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey but in these cases of refugees from Syria and Pakistan for the people who left the uncertainty in Afghanistan as far back as 1979.
There has been increased awareness of this problem in the developed world has lead us to increased efforts to come up with ideas to help control the flow of the migrants but so far only Australian has tried something similar to help providing aid to the developing countries in consideration for taking the migrants in and in this case the collaborations is from Naru and also Papua New Guinea that are hosting the detention centres for the processing of asylum applications. The project would be to expand the aid from the OECD countries to any county that would be willing to take in large numbers. This would for the most part not avoid the initial migration but would involve migrants being relocated to the countries that participate from the OECD countries once they come. Another addition to the arrangement would be providing the aid to developing countries along migration ways to send the migrants directly to those countries that are willing to taking them in.
The migrants that are in these developed countries are always treated like rubbish, an example of this is at the Traiskirchen migrant camp in Austria, This most probably one of the richest counties in the European Union and was interviewed for the cruel living conditions by Amnesty in August 2015.

The aid can be used to guarantee that the migrants are being well treated, provided for with the safe transport and also granted the access to the necessary government services such as healthcare and welfare. This provision therefore makes sense in a time where there were many developed countries that are both were struggling with the greater amounts of migrants and with austerity. There are countries like Greece, which had 124,000 migrants that had arrived in only the first seven months of 2015, a 750% increase over the same period in 2014. There is another pro of this institution in the increasing countries rather than the already developed countries are the cost. That amount of the money goes a lot further in the developing county, which is providing that money to the developing countries so that they can be responsible for the migrants they take in but it also doesn’t guarantee that the money will be spent on the migrants. In a few developing countries the aid is poorly spent or that it is critically affected by the corruption; 2012 the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon mentioned “Last year, corruption prevented 30 per cent of all development assistance from reaching its final destination”. Furthermore even if the aid is spend correctly on those it’s supposed to be for there are a few problems. A lot of the developing countries have been affected by the poverty, poor housing and a few government services. Aid that is being provided to pay for the migrants is more likely to cause bitterness among the population that doesn’t have the same access as the

migrants
It is an accident of the geography and history, just simply bad luck that has resulted in most taking large numbers of immigrants but the other countries get none. The first developed countries on the migrant routes have been getting large numbers, but as those who wish to seek asylum have to apply in a safe country first. Also those countries that live next to the war zones, or the places that are affected by natural disasters, have been getting a very large arrivals of migrants who are hoping to get home as soon as they possibly can. There are more than 1.1 million refugees that are from Syria in Lebanon with a county with less than 6 million. It is right that there should have been a mechanism to help level out the migrants and the rich developed countries should be the ones who pay that cost. Devolved countries shouldn’t be able to get out of their duty to take in the large numbers of migrants just simply because they can afford to pay the poorer counties to take their migrants in their place. Being Burdened due to geography it may be a bit unfair so it being burdened because you are not rich and you can easily be bribed by the rich.