Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Salem witch trials puritans
Salem witch trials colonial america
Tragedies of the Salem witch hunts in colonial Massachusetts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Salem witch trials puritans
An extraordinary 65.3 million Refugees have been displaced around the world. In 2015 Australia took 12,000 of them. But where are Australians placing these Refugees? Australia is deporting these Refugees to a third country, either on Manus or Nauru Island. These Islands have reports of inhumane and cruel treatment towards Refugees For those who aren’t fully aware of what Refugees are; they are people whom come to Australia illegally without the appropriate visas. They cannot obtain these visas because of the reasons they are fleeing their country … their Government. None the less it should be the Australian Government they fear. The concepts of refugees are kept hidden away from us by our own Government in reflection of their Governments own self-interest. This tragedy is classified as a modern day witch hunt.
The hunting of Refugees is much like in the early days of Salem in the 17th century however back then witch hunts were about hunting actually witches. During the Salem Witch trials the Church hunted down witches and executed them before the people of Massachusetts could start to believe them as innocent or even start to doubt the overall thought of witchcraft. This could be seen as understandable back in 17th Century when these Witch Trials took place, as the
…show more content…
world was based on a Patriotic, Religious crazed society. Refugees are given an unfair chance by our Government much like how the witches in Massachusetts were given an unfair trail due to the fact that the Government for Refugees and the Church in Salem would like to automatically express Refugees and Witches as guilty. The Australian Government aims to keep Refugees out and to portray them as awful people so Australians don’t argue against the Governments perspectives and fight to let Refugees in our country. It is even written in Australian Law that any information disclosed about the Detention Centers can lead to a 2 year jail sentence. So it is without a doubt that the Government wants to keep secrets. This isn’t just in Australia; many countries across Europe are experiencing this every day crisis. An American band called The Black Eyed Peas wrote a song called “Where is the love” this song is about world disasters and in this song a particular line which states “A war is goin' on but the reason's undercover” , this quote is a fine outliner of what is happening with our Australian Government and our Refugee crisis. Fear is a major expression that was one of the main causes of the execution of witches.
So what does this mean about our Government? Are they scared of the intake of Refugees? If so, what are they scared of? This contradicts the whole purpose of the Government, aren’t Australians meant to put our trust in leaders to make great decisions, hence we have a Government in the first place? Doctrines such as the Just War Doctrine a Catholic based Law, states that the Government should hold the responsibility for the common good. Yet not every country experiences this, and many Refugees have to flee in order for their freedom and to escape from persecution of their own beliefs, religions and human
rights. The United Nations was formed at the end of World War 2, to ensure there would be no more world wars. There are articles written in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in reference to Refugees, for example Article 14, which states that everyone has the right to seek asylum and Article 9 which states that “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile”. Australia has signed up to follow the rules and obligations set out by the United Nations, such as the principal of Non-Refoulment which states we cannot turn Refugees away. However the Government has found ways to sneak around these International Treaties and place these Refugees on offshore Detention Centers and are depriving Refugees of their right to seek asylum. Tax payers complain about the money being deducted from their pay to finance the settlement of these Refugees yet they fail to realize by letting them into our country will cost much less. For example it cost the Government $400 000 per Refugee to maintain them on an offshore detention center, whereas to keep them onshore will only cost $239 000. It would cost the Australian Government a total 9.6Billion to solve the reasons Refugees are created. However it will only cost us 1 Billion to keep them in Australia. Refugees are an issue in the world that cannot be controlled and turning them away isn’t a reasonable solution. Therefore keeping them is our only choice. However how we keep them is a different situation which must be taken seriously by our Government. Life is precious and everyone has the right to their own life, on the chance that someone’s liberty and freedom is taken away, others must step in to lend a helping hand. This is a rule in regard to basic morality and ethics. “Life, woman, life is God's most precious gift; no principle, however glorious, may justify the taking of it.” ― Arthur Miller, the Crucible. Reports on these Detention centers are proven to be vile and unnecessarily cruel, but why does Australians think this is too soft? Children wetting the bed because of nightmares and suffer from mental illnesses due to the trauma they have experienced. Australia has to take a step up to educate themselves into the state of Refugees and learn that no treatment they have received and are continuing to receive are too soft, but in fact harsh and inhumane. Hopefully this will lead to some different views on the status of Refugees.
I am writing to inform you of the current homeless situation in Australia and how we solve fix it.
Australian people should be opening arms to the Face of Mercy and to the Refugees that are
In doing so, we are also blocking out people who have the potential to bring even more cultural diversity into the community. If we honestly believe that we are a generous and multicultural nation, it’s time we show it by empathising with our fellow human beings. In order to improve the conditions in detention centres there must be a change to our unnecessarily harsh system. We need rules to be enforced, such as; a maximum 30 day time limit, and the people that are detained must be let out within this time frame. Within this time, health, character and identity checks must be completed. Shutting down isolating and remote detention centres. Speeding up the processing system. Asylum seekers must be given the opportunity to communicate with the outside world and have full access to legal advice and counselling. This means that telephones, internet and external activities need to be an option. Unaccompanied minors also need to be a priority. It is time that Australia treats our neighbours with all the dignity and respect that they finally
One of Australia’s biggest moral wrongdoings that has been continued to be overlooked is the providing of safety for refugees. Under the article 14, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it states that everyone has the right to seek and enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. It is not in anyway, shape or form illegal to seek asylum from maltreatment. Australia is obliged under international law to: offer protection, give support, ensure that any individual is not sent back unwillingly to the country of their origin. A report made by
The United States fails to protect its borders, while Australia sacrifices human rights in order to do so. Traditionally, first-world countries and their citizens assist those in less developed countries. Many of the island nations in the south pacific suffer from poverty and frequent natural disasters. Most would agree that, as the most developed country in the region, it is Australia’s responsibility to advocate for human rights and contribute to humanitarian efforts for the island nations. To its credit, Australia normally satisfies this role. However, when asylum-seekers come by boat, Australia draws a forceful line. The United States is also tasked with protecting its borders, but takes a more appropriate approach. In 2012, the PEW research
In 2005 the Migration Amendment Act was introduced which relates to the notion that children must only be put in detention centres as a matter of last resort to ensure the safety of children as there had been many concerns from the Members of parliament. This new policy had given the opportunity for many children and their families to be released into community detention centres whereby there is higher security to ensure their protection. However, in Australia there had still been a substantial amount of children that had still been held in detention centres and often for lengthy periods. Although the Australian Government had attempted to comply with the new policy by gradually allowing children and their families to be released into the community
The conditions of Australia’s immigration detention policies have also been cause for concern for probable contraventions of Articles 7 and 10 of the ICCPR. Whilst in Sweden, asylum seekers are afforded free housing whilst their applications are being processed, Australia’s methods are much more callous. Under the Pacific Solution, maritime asylum seekers are sent to impoverished tropical islands with no monitoring by human rights organisations allowed (Hyndman and Mountz, 2008). The UNHCR criticised Australia’s offshore processing centres stating that “significant overcrowding, cramped living quarters, unhygienic conditions, little privacy and harsh tropical climate contribute to the poor conditions of… Nauru and Papua New Guinea” (Morales
According to the 1951 Refugee Convention, refugee is a term applied to anyone who is outside his/her own country and cannot return due to the fear of being persecuted on the basis of race, religion, nationality, membership of a group or political opinion. Many “refugees” that the media and the general public refer to today are known as internally displaced persons, which are people forced to flee their homes to avoid things such as armed conflict, generalized violations of human rights or natural and non-natural disasters. These two groups are distinctly different but fall ...
This has led organisations such as Refugee councils and Refugee Action
The story I have just told you happened to an Afghani refugee named Chaman. You may be thinking ‘Oh no that is such an awful story! He must have the most unfortunate life!’, however, this is just one usual story out of hundreds and thousands of asylum seekers fleeing to Australia. Today I am here to educate you all on the truth about asylum seekers and why we must end the mandatory detention system and allow asylum seekers to come and live in Australia. Australia has resettled nearly 900000 refugees since the end of the 2nd World War, making one of the world’s most successful multicultural societies. However, with today’s government’s policy, those that are suffering in dangerous and hostile environments, those that are deprived of basic human rights and those that are seeking safety and peace, are banned from coming into the country and being sent back home or imprisoned in
Australia is a democratic country. A principal drawback of a modern democracy is that it often tends to overlook the interests of those least empowered. Among those most harshly dealt with in Australia are the poor, the marginalised and the asylum seeker. Asylum seekers and refugees count among those who remain ‘othered’ by Australian society and continue to suffer through an inability to exercise their rights and an existence that is dehumanised. This essay describes the human impact of Australia’s immigration policy and tells the powerful story of a voiceless girl. In doing so it highlights the general invisibility of asylum seekers in the eyes of the law and the desperate situations they face. What is at stake here is not just the persecution
With the recent Paris attacks and rumors of foreboding ISIS attacks, the topic of immigration comes up quite often in conversations. Topics such as how the immigrants should be dealt with, what exactly are the benefits and/or detriments of immigration, Donald Trump’s immigration plan, et cetera are usually discussed. With immigration gradually becoming a trending issue, various people have expressed their thoughts through means like social media and news sites. Joining this movement, this will be another text on the topic of immigration. The benefits of immigration will be presented, false information will be proven wrong, and why some people oppose immigration will be explained and discussed. Immigration should be widely accepted rather than
Therefore treatment towards asylum seekers are dependent on the way they arrive in Australia. Refuge seekers who come by boat can be detained for their whole life, this policy applies to them only in Australia. Australian judicial system does not prohibits such detention centers therefore, law and court cannot release them from there only because of inhumane treatment and conditions, and harm they are facing inside detention centers. It is believed by the Australian Federal Government that such detention centers are powerful way of stopping illegal
Another casual night: the air is sticky, and the water is scarce, all throughout the country the sound of gunshots are ringing through the air. For most people, this “casual” night is beyond their wildest imagination, but for Syrians it is an ongoing nightmare. Faced with the trauma of a civil war, Syrian refugees seek protection and a more promising future than the life they currently live in their oppressive country. Many seek refuge in other Middle East countries like Turkey and Jordan, but others search for hope in the icon of freedom, the United States of America. However, in America, there is an ongoing debate about whether or not Syrian refugees should be accepted. America needs to accept the Syrian refugees because if they do not, the
This book draws on New Zealand’s unique approach to refugees in helping victims of war and conflicts by offering them a chance to start a new life. The author has extensively discussed the concern of refugees who are obliged to leave their homeland, escape war and persecution because of cultural or religion beliefs. In relation to social transformat...