Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the Asylum seekers
Similarities between asylum seekers and refugees in australia compared with uk
Essays on the Asylum seekers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the Asylum seekers
Picture this; you’re a seventeen year old boy in Afghanistan. You belong to a minority ethnic group that is constantly persecuted by the Taliban. Your brothers went missing and your father was taken to prison by the Taliban and was tortured so badly that he died in prison. You have nightmares every night, you’re scared and worried if the same is going to happen to you. You hide for many years in Pakistan. And now you want to escape for safety and welfare, so your family sells everything they have to make enough money for a boat trip to Australia. You go on a risky and dangerous journey through Malaysia, Thailand, China and finally you arrive at a dock. You board on a packed fishing boat with 100 other people for countless days and you spend the nights dreaming about living in Australia. However, when you arrive, you’re locked up in a dark jail with hundreds of people, waiting for the government’s decision on whether to let you stay in the country or to make you leave. …show more content…
Good morning Miss Loxton and class.
The story I have just told you happened to an Afghani refugee named Chaman. You may be thinking ‘Oh no that is such an awful story! He must have the most unfortunate life!’, however, this is just one usual story out of hundreds and thousands of asylum seekers fleeing to Australia. Today I am here to educate you all on the truth about asylum seekers and why we must end the mandatory detention system and allow asylum seekers to come and live in Australia. Australia has resettled nearly 900000 refugees since the end of the 2nd World War, making one of the world’s most successful multicultural societies. However, with today’s government’s policy, those that are suffering in dangerous and hostile environments, those that are deprived of basic human rights and those that are seeking safety and peace, are banned from coming into the country and being sent back home or imprisoned in
jail. We must allow these desperate, pitiful and hopeless individuals to let them start a new life. Don’t we as Australians pride ourselves on looking after the needy, disadvantaged and the vulnerable? By allowing asylum seekers into the country, we are inviting them to experience freedom; freedom from the horrors that have dictated their entire lives. These people seek a new life, and the Australian government needs to allow asylum seekers to enter the country, to give them this opportunity. If we just let our politicians and media to continue this unethical and inhumane plan of stopping the asylum seekers, these needy individuals as well as their next generations, will have to go on with their unfortunate and pitiful lives. Imagine you are in the shoes of one of the asylum seekers. They travelled by boat with their family to get to Australia because they are facing a threat to their lives; would you do the same thing? If you had any common sense the answer would probably be a yes because you want a better life for your family and yourself. How would you feel if people from Australia did not let you into their country and turned their backs on you? How would you feel if you were treated like a prisoner and called a ‘criminal’, a ‘terrorist’ and a ‘queue jumper’? Also, the system of mandatory detention must stop. After escaping from violent, dangerous environments majority of the asylum seekers often arrive with very serious mental scars. They come to Australia expecting freedom from war and terror, but instead, they are locked in a facility bounded by barbed wires, just like prisoners. The poor facilities of the detention centres can cause even more detrimental impact on the mental health of the asylum seekers. In 2012-13 there were more than 800 reported incidents of self-harm across Australia’s detention network. In 2011 there were more than 10 reported deaths in detention centres across Australia with seven of them being suicides. According to a report released in 2006, it revealed that out of 100 children surveyed, more than 80 children suffered major depressive disorder and had developmental and emotional difficulties. These facts clearly prove that the mandatory detention centres have significant harmful impact on the asylum seekers. Therefore Australia must stop the policy of mandatory detention to ensure the mental wellbeing of asylum seekers and allow them to live in our country. Every week when you turn on the news you see politicians crying about the “refugee epidemic,” and how we must “stop the boats!” Politicians often refer to asylum seekers as “illegal immigrants” Do you think they are here illegally? They aren’t. We are a signatory to the United Nations Refugee Convention, meaning it is legal to seek asylum in Australia, even if you arrive by boat without a visa. Some say that we should not be accepting asylum seekers with the degree of leniency that we do because we are unaware of whom these people really are and may misjudge their character when in actuality they may be terrorists. It is quite bogus to see that some Australians are willing to generalise all of the asylum seekers as terrorists because there have been absolutely no cases of reported terrors caused by the asylum seekers so far. By locking asylum seekers in detention we let the community view them as prisoners who need to be locked up because they have committed a crime. By ending the practice of mandatory detention the stigmatisation of refugees in the community would be reduced as images of refugees in a ‘jail’ would not be seen most nights on the news.
Today on the Australia issues podcast with nick is the issues on asylum seekers that then treatment towards them.
Australian people should be opening arms to the Face of Mercy and to the Refugees that are
An extraordinary 65.3 million Refugees have been displaced around the world. In 2015 Australia took 12,000 of them. But where are Australians placing these Refugees? Australia is deporting these Refugees to a third country, either on Manus or Nauru Island. These Islands have reports of inhumane and cruel treatment towards Refugees For those who aren’t fully aware of what Refugees are; they are people whom come to Australia illegally without the appropriate visas. They cannot obtain these visas because of the reasons they are fleeing their country … their Government. None the less it should be the Australian Government they fear. The concepts of refugees are kept hidden away from us by our own Government in reflection of their Governments own self-interest. This tragedy is classified as a modern day witch hunt.
One of Australia’s biggest moral wrongdoings that has been continued to be overlooked is the providing of safety for refugees. Under the article 14, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it states that everyone has the right to seek and enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. It is not in anyway, shape or form illegal to seek asylum from maltreatment. Australia is obliged under international law to: offer protection, give support, ensure that any individual is not sent back unwillingly to the country of their origin. A report made by
The United States fails to protect its borders, while Australia sacrifices human rights in order to do so. Traditionally, first-world countries and their citizens assist those in less developed countries. Many of the island nations in the south pacific suffer from poverty and frequent natural disasters. Most would agree that, as the most developed country in the region, it is Australia’s responsibility to advocate for human rights and contribute to humanitarian efforts for the island nations. To its credit, Australia normally satisfies this role. However, when asylum-seekers come by boat, Australia draws a forceful line. The United States is also tasked with protecting its borders, but takes a more appropriate approach. In 2012, the PEW research
I ask you now to imagine such a life. It is impossible for us to imagine having to flee our homes and family simply because our beliefs or lifestyle are not deemed suitable. Furthermore, paying thousands of dollars to travel across treacherous oceans in shabby boats. The fact that asylum seekers are prepared to remain locked up in detention centres and be deprived of their freedom must surely tell us of the horrific circumstances from which they have fled. ******** PUT IN CLOSING PARAGRAPH.
The 2002 Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act abandoned the dispersal policy and voucher scheme and introduced warehousing accommodation in the form of a camp that’s like a prison to house asylum seekers with a separate education and healthcare provision, these finally excludes them from normal community life (Bochel et al, 2009:388). This was highly criticized by NGOs, refugee council, refugee organization and several charitable organizations for refugee and this sometimes led to riots in the detention centre. The 2004-2006 Act further tightens the asylum system and speeded detention and removal by the withdrawal of legal rights (Bochel et al, 2009:388). The home office insist the dispersal policy is going on well whereas on the ground opinion is mixed (Guardian, 27 June 2001) this came up due to the case of some 14 asylum seekers on hunger strike in protest against the poor living condition in the privately run Liverpool tower block. The refugee council has serious concern over the dispersal policy especially as unaccompanied minors are being dispersed alongside adults with no proper resources and support service put in place. Chief executive Nick Hardwick mentioned that for dispersal policy to work government department need to develop proper support services for asylum seekers in dispersing areas and that dumping asylum seekers on poor estate blocks where they cannot access basic services like healthcare and education is leaving them abandoned and vulnerable (Guardian, 27 June 2001). In some situation asylum seekers refused to be dispersed and decide to
Although, asylum seekers and refugees are given a few options if they feel as though their rights are being breached, like they can apply to tribunals and courts to view their visa related decisions, they can also make a complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission about their human rights being breached in immigration detention centres, yet they do not have control over who enters the country, the government is not obliged to comply with the recommendations that are made. Although the government has made few attempts to comply with the human rights obligations towards asylum seekers and refugees by introducing new policies and prioritising the safety of the children in these detention camps, there are currently still many breaches towards their rights that the government continues to adapt, therefore they are still constituting a breach of international law.
The conditions of Australia’s immigration detention policies have also been cause for concern for probable contraventions of Articles 7 and 10 of the ICCPR. Whilst in Sweden, asylum seekers are afforded free housing whilst their applications are being processed, Australia’s methods are much more callous. Under the Pacific Solution, maritime asylum seekers are sent to impoverished tropical islands with no monitoring by human rights organisations allowed (Hyndman and Mountz, 2008). The UNHCR criticised Australia’s offshore processing centres stating that “significant overcrowding, cramped living quarters, unhygienic conditions, little privacy and harsh tropical climate contribute to the poor conditions of… Nauru and Papua New Guinea” (Morales
As a signatory to the UN 1951 refugee convention, we have already agreed, not to return asylum seekers or to detain them indefinitely. In 2001, the Tampa incident brought disrepute to us as we failed to take the right action. Another wave of backlash irrupted when Indonesian fishing vessel codenamed SEIV X sank in northern waters. The UN is highly critical on the practice of mandatory detention over long periods. As a law abiding nation, we need to keep our citizens well informed of our obligations under UN convention so that we can collectively meet our obligations in true spirit. Once Australians realise that we are providing over 200,000 migrant visas annually and the asylum seekers would occupy less than 2% of it and irrespective of the fears mongered by politicians, almost 93% of asylum seekers who arrived by boat in the have been recognized as “genuine” refugees by Australian authorities and the popular “country shoppers” or “economic migrant” stories do not represent the reality, it is not difficult to develop a national consensus on this ongoing, unavoidable issue in an overpopulated world with a massive imbalance in resource
Hook: "I will build a great wall -- and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me --and I'll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will makge Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words." Introduction: the Presidential elect Donald J. trump has proposed and promised to build a large reinforced wall along our southern border with Mexico. If successful, it could have a tremendous effect on the U.S economy.
a. The National Human Trafficking Resource Center has made an effort between the Departments of State, Justice and Homeland Security created the Human Smuggling and Trafficking center to centralize information.
If you are an immigrant or just want to live in one of the best counties in the world illegally, with no penalty if you get caught come to Americana. They will welcome you with open aims Just like (Fred Reed) – said in “Why Blame Mexico” (we say to impoverished Mexicans, “See this river? Don’t cross it. If you do, we’ll give you good jobs, driver’s licenses, citizenship for your kids born here, school for said kids, public assistance, governmental documents in Spanish for your convenience, and a much better future. There is no penalty for getting caught. Now, don’t cross this river, hear?” How smart is that? We’re baiting them. It’s like putting out a salt lick and then complaining when deer come. Immigrant parents would be irresponsible not
“A guy sends you a friend request. You don’t know him, but he’s got a cute profile picture, so you accept his friend request. It’s your baby girl’s first day of school. She looks SO cute in her new outfit you just have to take a picture and put it on Facebook so all your friends and family can see. You’re so excited dropping her off that you ‘Check in’ to her school on Facebook. Meanwhile, the mystery guy whose friend request you hurriedly accepted earlier this morning is saving that picture you posted of your daughter in her cute new outfit to his phone and texting it to 60 other grown men across the world with the caption –‘American Female, Age 5, Brown Hair, Black Eye, $5,000. Not only did you provide a picture of your little girl to a
In relation to social transformation I have gathered materials that focusses on programs provided for ‘refugees’ living in New Zealand. The purpose of my findings are based on the societies support for ‘refugees’ in terms of human security and directions of life before settling in their new destination. There are stories about ‘refugees’ that need to be shared and stories that need to be forgotten, because it can produce controversy within the society or the universe. But where can these ‘refugees’ go if the place they call home is unsafe or too risky for the lives of their families and for themselves. It’s hard enough to migrate into a new country, but it is devastating for refugees who have experienced the loss of homes and loved ones.