Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The essay of immigration australia
Essays on refugees in australia
ESSAYS asylum seekers in australia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The essay of immigration australia
Refugee arrivals on Australian shores, particularly those arriving irregularly by sea, have over the past years been a matter of significant political and public concern. Australia has a long history of accepting refugees for resettlement, however despite this the Australian Government has recognised the magnitude of these global trends, noting that the number of asylum seekers and refugees in Australia are small, at its peak only receiving eighteen thousand people illegally by sea, compared to those seeking asylum in other parts of the world. There is still a large debate on the global stage as to whether the current Australian laws relating to the acceptance and resettlement of refugees and asylum seekers, as a party of the CRC (Convention on the Rights of Children), the ICCPR and the Refugee Convention, is fulfilling …show more content…
According to rights groups the detention centres positioned in Nauru and Manus Island are “totally inadequate, citing poor hygiene, cramped conditions, unrelenting heat and lack of facilities” ().This not only contests with International Policies but also with fundamental human rights such as the Right to Social Security, Right to Education (Child refugees kept in Detention Centre for long periods of time), Right to Standard of living adequate for the health and wellbeing (includes food, clothing, house, medical care), Right to freedom of movement, Right to seek asylum and Right from torture and other cruel, inhuman degrading treatment or punishment. Offshore processing has proved contentious not only due to poor living conditions but also the financial costs, the ongoing concerns about the saftey of refugees, the ongoing concerns about the sustainability of involuntary settlement and the independent oversights. With offshore processing alone costs and average at four hundred thousand dollars per refugee per
An extraordinary 65.3 million Refugees have been displaced around the world. In 2015 Australia took 12,000 of them. But where are Australians placing these Refugees? Australia is deporting these Refugees to a third country, either on Manus or Nauru Island. These Islands have reports of inhumane and cruel treatment towards Refugees For those who aren’t fully aware of what Refugees are; they are people whom come to Australia illegally without the appropriate visas. They cannot obtain these visas because of the reasons they are fleeing their country … their Government. None the less it should be the Australian Government they fear. The concepts of refugees are kept hidden away from us by our own Government in reflection of their Governments own self-interest. This tragedy is classified as a modern day witch hunt.
One of Australia’s biggest moral wrongdoings that has been continued to be overlooked is the providing of safety for refugees. Under the article 14, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it states that everyone has the right to seek and enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. It is not in anyway, shape or form illegal to seek asylum from maltreatment. Australia is obliged under international law to: offer protection, give support, ensure that any individual is not sent back unwillingly to the country of their origin. A report made by
Phillips, J. (2011), ‘Asylum seekers and refugees: What are the facts?’, Background note, Parliamentry library, Canberra.
The United States fails to protect its borders, while Australia sacrifices human rights in order to do so. Traditionally, first-world countries and their citizens assist those in less developed countries. Many of the island nations in the south pacific suffer from poverty and frequent natural disasters. Most would agree that, as the most developed country in the region, it is Australia’s responsibility to advocate for human rights and contribute to humanitarian efforts for the island nations. To its credit, Australia normally satisfies this role. However, when asylum-seekers come by boat, Australia draws a forceful line. The United States is also tasked with protecting its borders, but takes a more appropriate approach. In 2012, the PEW research
Most Asylum Seekers Arrive by Boat: Recent wars have increased the number of asylum seekers arriving by boat; however, an average of thirteen asylum seekers arrives through Australian airports each day. Asylum seeker transport by air is ninety percent more likely than by boat. Australia is simple not being f...
Although, asylum seekers and refugees are given a few options if they feel as though their rights are being breached, like they can apply to tribunals and courts to view their visa related decisions, they can also make a complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission about their human rights being breached in immigration detention centres, yet they do not have control over who enters the country, the government is not obliged to comply with the recommendations that are made. Although the government has made few attempts to comply with the human rights obligations towards asylum seekers and refugees by introducing new policies and prioritising the safety of the children in these detention camps, there are currently still many breaches towards their rights that the government continues to adapt, therefore they are still constituting a breach of international law.
The conditions of Australia’s immigration detention policies have also been cause for concern for probable contraventions of Articles 7 and 10 of the ICCPR. Whilst in Sweden, asylum seekers are afforded free housing whilst their applications are being processed, Australia’s methods are much more callous. Under the Pacific Solution, maritime asylum seekers are sent to impoverished tropical islands with no monitoring by human rights organisations allowed (Hyndman and Mountz, 2008). The UNHCR criticised Australia’s offshore processing centres stating that “significant overcrowding, cramped living quarters, unhygienic conditions, little privacy and harsh tropical climate contribute to the poor conditions of… Nauru and Papua New Guinea” (Morales
In the Pacific, Australia is the most able in providing asylum for international asylum seekers. Australia is currently undergoing reform to its asylum policy. The current leading party is against immigration and supports limiting the number of accepted asylum seekers. Many are pushing policies to expedite asylum seekers to the prosecuting government of origin.
Bhabha, J., & Young, W. (1998) Through A Child's Eyes: Protecting the Most Vulnerable Asylum Seekers. Interpreter Releases 75 (21), pp. 757-791.
As a signatory to the UN 1951 refugee convention, we have already agreed, not to return asylum seekers or to detain them indefinitely. In 2001, the Tampa incident brought disrepute to us as we failed to take the right action. Another wave of backlash irrupted when Indonesian fishing vessel codenamed SEIV X sank in northern waters. The UN is highly critical on the practice of mandatory detention over long periods. As a law abiding nation, we need to keep our citizens well informed of our obligations under UN convention so that we can collectively meet our obligations in true spirit. Once Australians realise that we are providing over 200,000 migrant visas annually and the asylum seekers would occupy less than 2% of it and irrespective of the fears mongered by politicians, almost 93% of asylum seekers who arrived by boat in the have been recognized as “genuine” refugees by Australian authorities and the popular “country shoppers” or “economic migrant” stories do not represent the reality, it is not difficult to develop a national consensus on this ongoing, unavoidable issue in an overpopulated world with a massive imbalance in resource
Some asylum seekers know Australia as a “safe country” and a “humane country” that respect people and refugees, but what did Australia give them back? The Australian Government is trying to prevent asylum seekers from exercising their rights. They come to Australia thinking that their life will shift for the better and that they will be safe if they came here, but little do they know by the time they arrive to the seashore their life is ruined. Asylum chasers such as, children, mothers, fathers, elderly people and pregnant mothers are being sent to detention centres in Australia each year. In 2015 there were 227 children in immigration detention facilities on the Australian Islands, Manus and on Nauru island according to the Asylum Seekers Resource Centre.
The story I have just told you happened to an Afghani refugee named Chaman. You may be thinking ‘Oh no that is such an awful story! He must have the most unfortunate life!’, however, this is just one usual story out of hundreds and thousands of asylum seekers fleeing to Australia. Today I am here to educate you all on the truth about asylum seekers and why we must end the mandatory detention system and allow asylum seekers to come and live in Australia. Australia has resettled nearly 900000 refugees since the end of the 2nd World War, making one of the world’s most successful multicultural societies. However, with today’s government’s policy, those that are suffering in dangerous and hostile environments, those that are deprived of basic human rights and those that are seeking safety and peace, are banned from coming into the country and being sent back home or imprisoned in
It is evident that there is human injustice with refugees and asylum seekers in Australia. Refugees and asylum seekers are seeking safety and protection from the severe circumstance of injustice that they have had to experience. There are over 436 people in offshore detention in Australia
The first chapter of the book provides a highly informative background and history to the concept of refugees, as well as their relevance to the modern international political system. The authors importantly point out that defining a refugee is not simply a matter of academic concern because resulting definitions may mean the difference between life and death for people in conflict zones. Defining a refugee involves political and ethical considerations, inevitably creating disagreement regarding the issue. For example, when refugees are defined in a certain way by the United Nations, research will consequently revolve around such definitions and will help support the status quo of the institut...
Globalisation has increased modern technology all over the world enabling more people, such as globally separated families, to maintain contact. Increased media coverage also draws the attention of the world to human rights violation which can lead to an improvement in human rights. This is not a reflection of all marginalised groups. In Australia, the detention of unaccompanied asylum seeking children (UASC) contravenes the United Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), however the media are prohibited to enter detention centres and report on this issue (Cemlyn and Briskman, 2003).