Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion in the Tinker v. Des Moines case
What was the response to tinker v. des moines
Negative effects of dress codes in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion in the Tinker v. Des Moines case
Nowadays, clothing is a key necessity for daily life. Clothing can be personal, and used to signify an outward expression of an individual’s inner self and uniqueness. It also helps people portray a certain persona or prestige by the clothing they choose to wear. In today’s fashion-forward society, most often idolized, are the newest trends from magazines, popular department stores, and what celebrities are wearing. The fashion industry, delivers clothing geared towards age, gender, and social groups of people, by offering various subculture fashions. The “Preppy” look, the “Grunge” look, and the “Vintage” look are a few examples of these social groupings. With countless options to choose from, people easily express their individuality, religious …show more content…
Then again, wearing half-shirts and leggings is just as fitting to people. Is one or the other less appropriate, and how do they decide? To refrain from enforcing the dress code on an individual basis, and confronting each student for improper clothing, the schools decided to generate a policy for all students and forbid certain attire for cohesion. The dress code policy originated because the schools did not want sexual harassment or inappropriate behaviors to emerge on campus. They want an environment where students can receive their education and feel safe in a conducive setting. They are concerned that, if the students dress too provocatively or wear offensive clothing, it will be a distraction to others and hinder the education of those around them. The U.S. Supreme Court enforced the first dress code law in 1969. The case, known as Tinker vs. Des Moines Independent School District, involved several high school students who wore black armbands to school in a planned protest against the Vietnam War. In a far-reaching decision, the Court essentially decided that schools may limit student expression (such as enforcing dress codes) if there is a legitimate concern that such expression will be disruptive to the learning environment or violate the rights of others. (FindLaw,
In the 1960s, some Americans were against sending troops to Vietnam because of the many lives risked; others were against sending troops because of the money it would cost. In 1965, a group of Des Moines high school students met up and agreed to wear black armbands that following week to protest against the Vietnam War. Rumors got around to school principles. School Principals passed a rule forbidding armbands to be worn at school to prevent disruption in the classrooms. In December, five students wore armbands ignoring the school’s new rule. They were asked to take off the armbands, and they refused resulting in suspension ("Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist"). Then the parents of those complained that the first amendment rights of those students were violated. This case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled that students still have their rights of freedom of speech and expression in school in a 7-2 vote in favor of Tinker (“TINKER v. DES MOINES INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT”).
Student court cases against schools, or vice versa, are not as uncommon as they may seem. Tinker v. Des Moines was a court case that ended in 1969 regarding students protesting the Vietnam War. The three students involved in the trial wore black armbands to school, which was prohibited, and were suspended. Since the students felt that their First Amendment right was abused by the school therefore they took the issue to a local court, then eventually the Supreme Court. The case has left a mark on First Amendment rights for students since then. The Tinker v. Des Moines court case impacted the United States by questioning the First Amendment in public schools, spreading awareness of student rights, and by challenging future court cases using
One main reason public schools have uniforms / dress code is because in 1996, President Clinton allowed the school uniform movement and said, “If it means teenagers will stop killing each other over designer jackets, then our public schools should be able to require their students to wear school uniforms.” This gave schools the power to control the students with dress code. A few pros about having dress code in public schools are prevention from formation of gangs, identify intruders, resist peer pressure, and take away social barriers. But the cons give more reasons on why not to have dress code. Some are violation of freedom of expression, “Band-Aid” on school violence, bully targets, financial issue for certain families, and difficult to enforce. Dress code can vary from a button down solid polo with a tie, to solid colors, navy / khaki pants, to any polo shirt without offensive print / sayings and unholy jeans. Dress code also can exclude tattoos, baggy clothes, holes, scarves, leggings, strapless garments, and visible piercings (except in ear).
In the 1969 case of Tinker vs Des Moines, one of the most well-known student rights cases it has considered, the US Supreme Court ruled that students had a constitutional right to wear a black armband to school to protest
Fashion in the 21st century is a big business, as its production employs millions of people and generates billions of dollars in revenue. Fashion has for the past century been, and is still today, used as an indicator of social change and progress, as it changes with the social norms of the society and the political changes of the world (Finkelstein 3). Works Cited Finkelstein, Joanne. A.S.A. & Co. Fashion: An Introduction to Fashion. New York: New York University Press, 1998.
One of the greatest controversies that is spreading throughout high schools in the United States is parents and their children against the enforcement of their school’s uniform policy. More schools have been adopting uniform policies within the past decade. Rules contained in the policy that are implemented range from wearing certain types of tops (shirts) in specified colors to students being required to tuck in their shirts. In the past, uniforms were exclusively for students who attended private schools because they were “well-off”, but now uniforms are being seen more frequently in public schools on students of all economic levels. Having gone through a school system that considered adopting a uniform policy, I would have to press against the issue of mandated uniforms, because it is simply un-American and unjust.
Dress code, probably one of the most talked about topics by teenagers. Most teenagers believe that dress code is “witless” or “incompetent”. Why do we think this? Well, most adults believe that keeping a strict dress code keeps us educated because apparently our clothes are “distracting”. Now I can see how wearing booty shorts and a tank top would be distracting, but how is wearing sweatpants distracting? If anything wearing sweatpants keeps us comfortable, because I know that being uncomfortable is way more distracting than wearing sweatpants. When I wear sweatpants I can lay back and relax while the teacher talks, but if I am uncomfortable I am more likely to move around and fidget with my clothes rather than listen to the lesson.
The first amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition (law.cornell.edu). Expressing ourselves is a big part of modern society. We express ourselves by our feelings and the way we dress. This is when the dress codes play a big role. When we are getting dressed we dress for ourselves to be comfortable and sometimes we even dress to impress people. “You only have one chance to make a first impression(unknown)” so why are schools limiting students by how they dress. In
Destruction of Dress Codes She wears short shorts, she wears T-shirts, she’s cheer captain, they are both in the office for violating dress code. Most schools around the nation enforce a strict dress code, mostly directed at the girls, but they claim to be for the benefit of all who attend. However, a recent story about a 17-year-old female student who was disciplined for neglecting to wear a bra suffered through a scenario of shame and embarrassment implemented by her dean, which goes to dispute the usefulness or necessity of a code. School dress codes should be abolished nationwide because they target young female bodies, cause unnecessary repercussions, and force young men to be seen as villains who are unable to control themselves.
Have you ever seen a more provocative generation of women than today’s? Women these days are starting to dress completely out of hand. The majority of clothing women, especially teens these days are showing more and more skin than ever before. This distracts men from what is important, as well as making them lose their moral direction. Women need to know it is their responsibility to dress appropriately to keep from distracting men.
The first dress code was sent to be decided by the Supreme Court. The problem was that students were protesting against the Vietnam War by wearing black wristbands which educators thought to be disrupting to the classroom. However, these codes help prepare kids for the real world where they must dress to the appropriate attire. Research shows, that students learn better when there is a dress code in place and the staff says many students are less worried about what they are wearing and focusing more on completing their school work. Dress codes also introduce a healthy learning environment for kids and help reduce violence. Other statistics have changes as well. Attendance has gone up and gang violence has gone down. Some students are feeling uncomfortable and are saying students are going to have to start dressing the same due to the dress code. On the same note, students also feel that their individualism has gone down because there are so many restrictions on what they can and cannot
Some believe that the dress code was made to keep the students safe (Student 15/16). Some schools require a strict dress code while others have specific uniforms that each student must wear (“School”). Uniforms are rare in the U.S however, they are very popular in areas such as Africa, Asia, and South America (Buggs). Dress code also prevents bullying. Many conclude that in less wealthy places it doesn’t make the rich stand out and look better than the poor if
The final reason, and possibly the most important of the three to change the dress code is that by telling a students that they have to change, a teacher or administrator is putting the value of the other students’ education above the dress code offender. Most often, the reason a student’s are told to change because their outfits are too distracting. a pair of shorts isn’t harming anyone, nor is it offensive. Are shoulders and legs so arousing that it completely stops anybody from being able to focus at all? Then, what will the suspect think? He or she can’t wear what she wants to because the education of the male students in her class is more important? It puts a student in a very tough spot because they are forced to make the decision between wearing what they want or wearing something that takes who they are away from
Have you ever considered why students should wear a school uniform? For a long time, scholars have debated worldwide, whether students should wear a school uniform or not. After a lot of research, I can evidently see that people still have diverse opinions about this subject as some people think school uniform is essential, some are just fine with its existence, and some think it is useless.
Fashion is a controversial issue in society nowadays. We live in a consumerism advanced era in which whether following fashion trends or not has become a debatable point. Many people believe that it is important to follow fashion trends. For example, Lord Chesterfield once said, “If you are not in fashion, you are nobody.” The question is why fashion should be an essential matter of concern to all of us. As far as I am concerned, each person should be able to decide if one wants to follow a trend or not.