1.0) Definition of Leadership Leadership refers to the processes of mutual influence that occur between the members of a group and their leader (s) and contribute to their performance, motivation and satisfaction. 1.1) DIFFERENT TYPES OF LEADERSHIP The personalist approaches: This approach tends to define the leader by its own characteristics. It is doomed to failure because no study has been able to reveal any correlation between leadership and physical attributes, age, degree of expertise or social or professional motivations, or even with the commitment or participation of an individual. These characteristics do not make him a leader. Interactionist approaches: Interactionist approaches emphasize the relationship between the leader …show more content…
Cognitive approaches to leadership: Represented in particular by the categorization theory of the leader (Lord and Maher 1991). The members of a group would classify in the first moments of their meeting the other participants in leader and not leader by relying on their implicit theory of leader or prototype of leader. The following theories relate to the effectiveness of the leader: The theory of behavioral styles This theory emphasizes on the one hand the initiative dimension of the leadership (is leader the one who plans and coordinates) on the other hand the dimension consideration (is leader who pays attention to the aspirations and expectations of the members of the group). The management grid of Blake and Mouton …show more content…
The neo-charismatic theories of the transformational leader and cognitive resources These theories emphasize the symbolic and cognitive dimensions of the leader. In this context we note the theory of the transformational leader (Burns 1978). According to him, leadership is a process of influence of the leader on his subordinates that is based on a transactional dimension (the leader considers his relationship with his subordinates as a negotiation of objectives, a contingent reward for support) and a transformational spring (the leader motivates his subordinates in the direction of goals transcending their personal interests). Also in this framework is the theory of cognitive resources (Fiedler 1996) He considers how the leader uses his cognitive resources (experience, intelligence) and based on the assumption that there is no correlation between the leader's cognitive resources and the group's performance, he expresses the principle of adaptation to the pressure situation (stress) or not to favor one of the cognitive
ideals of leadership which could apply in a general case. This model emphasizes the fact that most leadership occurs in interpersonal interaction over an exposition to a large crowd. According to Scholl who performed a study at Jr. Labor Research Center, because leadership is constantly being evaluated by organizational members, superiors, and the public, there are always groups involved in the process as opposed to having a “formal leader” take charge (Scholl, 2003, pp. 2). He goes on to state that even though leadership assigns value to the individual role, there is never a point where the leader in that specific role exerts an absolute sphere of influence without competing claims (Scholl, 2003, pp.3). The process of exercising this type of leadership is inclusive and ethical because it gives an agency to everyone who is a part of the organization (Komives, 2007, p.74). Each person is a part of the leadership process because just be being a follower under a leader there is a relationship attached to oneself. This model is not descriptive but rather prescriptive. It tells one how to act and how to effectively lead rather than simply describe a process which can be observed in nature. The components of leadership involved include inclusivity of others views, the empowerment of those involved, being purposeful with one's goal and aligning others with that goal, and being ethical with good morals. As part of this model each component of this model must be part of a process which includes knowing, being, and doing (Komives, 2007, p.76). Knowing, being, and doing is an interrelated process which influences the leaders thinking and behavior. Knowing i...
The theory reduces the expectations from the leader, instead focuses on matching the leader to a task
Over the course of the module many varying Leadership theories have been discussed. An in depth look in to theories such as Emotional Intelligence, Multiple Intelligence, co leadership and group cohesion, but for the purpose of this essay the two specific Leadership theories will be that of group
Leadership has been defined in different ways, a definitaion of leadership that would be most commonly accepted would be “the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organization…”(House et al., 1999, p. 184 as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 19). After a comprehensive review of different leadership literature, Stogdill (1974, p. 259, as cited in Yukl, 2013, p. 18) concluded that “There are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept." Leadership can be viewed from two different angles one is shared influence process and other as a specialized role. Researcher who view leadership as a specialized role consider attributes as a factor in selecting a designated leader. On the contrast, theorist who emphasises on influence process considers “Leadership” as a social process or a pattern of relationship.
The leader by its meaning is one who goes first and leads by example and then the other will followed him after being motivated. The above diagram can be explain as; with the three combinations, the person or the leader will influence the other people or the follower to achieve the purpose or goal. In order to achieve the goal, the leader must have a deep rooted commitment to the goal that he will strive to achieve even if nobody follows him (Wong, 2007). The follower also can influence the leader in order to achieve the goal.
First of all, in the first Chapter, he made a clear definition about leadership. He wrote, “Leadership is the process of persuasion or example by which an individual induces a group to pursue objectives held by the leader and his followers.” In this precise sentence, he pointed that four indispensable parts in one organization: leader, team member, target, belief. He regarded leader doesn’t refer to an individual, but the leadership team, because no individual has all the skills to solve different difficulties.
The leadership is a privilege and it is such a privilege and an honor which will carry the tremendous responsibility which will inspire others to direct them to accomplish goals and vision of the organization. Leadership is about influencing the people, by producing direction, purpose and motivating in order to accomplish the mission, vision and improving the organization. The leadership philosophy is evolved based on the experiences, both positive and negative, in most of the initiatives and activities that we undertake. It is also one among the collaboration and teamwork within which the team members can utilize each other’s strengths to counter the weaknesses of the individuals. By observing, introspecting and experimenting we can developed a leadership paradigm which is inclusive, collaborative and proactive. We can develop the ability to recognize which will approach in order to reach the productive conclusion. The great leaders know their limitations and are capable at utilize their strengths and also the strengths of others to compensate.
Leadership is that process in which one person sets the purpose or direction for one or more other persons and gets them to move along together with him or her and with each other in that direction with competence and full commitment (Elliott, 2009). Leadership is supposed to guide people to attain a particular set vision. Motivation is fundamental in the process of leadership as if there is no motivation there will be laxity among the people involved. It is also a critical scenario for leadership to have followers; this will infer a relationship between leaders and followers (Frank, 2003).
There are lots of definitions and interpretations for the term LEADERSHIP. One is “A relationship through which one person influences the behaviour or actions of other people” (Mullins, L.J. 2002, Management and Organisational Behaviour, 6th Edition, FT Publishing, p904). Another popular definition would be, “the process of influencing an organization or groups within an organization in its efforts towards achieving a goal” (Johnson, Scholes & Whittington, 2005, Exploring Corporate Strategy, 7th Edition, FT Prentice Hall, p.519)
In my view, people employ certain traits that differentiate us from our neighbor next door, and leadership is no different. The test produced by the University of Kent in the United Kingdom (University of Kent, n.d.) has developed a process that I feel accurately defines what sort of leader you are based on 50 simple questions. I was not surprised by the results and found them to be quite accurate and expected. In this essay, I will explore why I feel the test is an accurate way to determine your leadership style due to my personal experience with
Leadership is a concept that defines the needs of others to be more important. In this perspective, a leader needs to meet certain characteristics to be categorized in a
Leadership is the ability to inspire confidence, support and trust among the people who need to achieve organizational goals. (Chan & Maubourgne 1992) It invariably requires using power to influence the thoughts and actions of other people in order to create new approaches and imagine new areas to explore. This definition has emphasized on influencing people to achieve set goals. In other words, we can say, the objective of leadership is achieving goals, meanwhile, the application is influencing other people to motivate the energy and stimulate the potential towards the goals.
Leadership is a well researched area in social sciences and management sciences. One of the most renowned definitions of leadership includes the definition by Locke (1991) in which he argued that leadership is the ability to include other people in decision making process. This reflects that leaderships is inclined to relations. This is something different from management. Managers tend to solve the problem immediately whereas; a leader will try to understand the problem fully before taking any decision about its resolution.
Many people believe that leadership is simply being the first, biggest or most powerful. Leadership in organizations has a different and more meaningful definition. A leader is someone who sets direction in an effort or task and influences or motivates people to follow that direction. The power point presentation explains leadership is the influence that particular individuals exert on the goal achievement of others in an organizational context.
Leaderis a person who has strong ability to control and direct people in the right ways. There are 10 types of leadership, also there are many differences in skills between leaders and many different ways that each leader uses to treat others. Also Leadership has been described as "a process of social influence in which a person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task". For example, some understand a leader simply as somebody whom people follow, or as somebody who guides or directs others, while others define leadership as "motivating and organizing a group of people to achieve a common goal".