Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on personal boundaries and space
Essay on personal boundaries and space
Social interaction and influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on personal boundaries and space
Book Task
Personal Space
Topic 2
Robbin Bott
4/12/2016
Thou shall not transgress thy neighbor's personal space. It's among the most sacrosanct rules of social behavior. But how do these invisible bubbles of space surrounding each of us come to exist in the first place , and why does it feel so icky when they overlap?
First, how big are these bubbles? According to the American anthropologist Edward Hall, whose 1960s research on the topic still stands today, you're actually enveloped by bubbles of four different sizes, each of which applies to a different set of potential interlopers.
The smallest zone, called "intimate space," extends outward from our bodies 18 inches in every direction, and only family, pets and one's closest friends may
…show more content…
This bubble is created in our childhood and varies depending on the location you grew up in. For example, someone who grew up in the country side or on a farm is used to having lots of space to themselves, therefore, their bubble would be significantly bigger than someone who grew up in New York or New Delhi where the population is denser and everywhere is more crowded. A few years ago in Spain they decided to add extra seats in class rooms as the population was growing instead of expanding the schools, the result was catastrophic as the students not only could retain less information but became significantly more violent by the invasion of personal space and started fighting each …show more content…
The Intimate Zone is the most important zone of all as it is only reserved for a select few of people, including parents, love partners, children, family and very close friends. The proximity chosen by people is also dependant on who the other person is. Only love partners or our children for instance, would be allowed to engage in close physical proximity (15 cms or less) especially in the hip area as opposed to a distant family member. Anyone who is not meant to be in the Intimate Zone and enters it will cause physiological changes (such as increased heart rate) in our body as we will feel threatened.
• Friend Zone: This is about 45 cms to 1.2 meters (18 to 46 inches). This is the distance that we reserve for social gatherings such as parties, friendly interactions, etc.
• Social Zone: About 1.2 to 3.5 meters (4 to 12 feet) this zoning is reserved for strangers we just met, acquaintances and anyone we interact with that we haven't established a relationship
One of the things Aristotle discusses is the need to limit the number of friends we have. He states: “So the right course is perhaps not to seek to
To Inness, intimacy is the core of privacy. “Intimacy is the sharing of information about one’s actions, beliefs, or emotions which one does not share with all” (Inness 1992). This suggests that to share full intimacy with another person, it requires letting people into their lives. This does not have to be with only someone that you intend on having a loving relationship with. Inness goes on about letting friends into your private life at times can be helpful to someone. Friendships can be just important as relationships to certain people.
The next few observations involve his interactions with Person B. Person A was consistently reaching across the table and holding Person B’s hand. Whenever possible, he was touching Person B in some way—whether holding her hand or rubbing her arm. Another observation was his use of personal space. Upon walking to the table, Person A had his arm around Person B and was holding Person B close. There was no personal space needed for Person A in this instance. A fourth o...
First, we will talk about the kind of friend who we meet every day, the convenience friends. Viorst described them in her book: “these are the neighbor or office mate or member of our carpool whose lives routinely intersect with ours.” (1). That is my good neighbor, George, who always say hello to me every morning. We often talk to each other when we are cleaning up our car on Sunday. We only have casual talks as we do not mention about our own families and personal stories. Besides that, there is nothing between us, just the neighborhood. Base on Viorst opinion, convenient friends is those that we would not have been friend, only cross each other occasionally. These people are not really friends in the sense of it. These are people we get to relate with out of convenience, we would not have talk to them too much about ourselves. Even Viorst admitted that: “But we don’t with convenience friends, ever come too close or tell too much: We maintai...
One big implicit social norm involves personal space. In our society it is implicitly know that you give people enough space when waiting in line or when sitting next to them as not to invade their personal bubble. I thought it would be particularly interesting to see what people did the moment you crossed that “bubble line.” Periodically throughout the day I would intrude upon people’s bubbles. For varied results, this occurred in classrooms, the elevator, the lunch line, the lunch table, and at work. During classes and at lunch I would move my chair really close to that of the person next to me. While in the lunch line and in the elevator I would stand really close to the person, even if there was plenty of space to spread out. At work, again I stood really close to the person when talking to them.
Lingis (1994) indicates that “One exposes oneself to the other-the stranger, the destitute one, the judge-not only with one’s insights and one’s ideas, that they may be contested, but one also exposes the nakedness of one’s eyes, one’s voice, and one’s silence, one’s empty hands” (p. 11). This “other community” comes into being when the stranger is exposed, having no common rational discourse with us. This stranger or intruder disrupts or intentions and makes us question our own cultural coding, “arresting one’s own intentions” during their encounter.
The Interaction Order of Public Bathrooms, written by Spencer E. Cahill, is an article that does a fairly well job at analyzing interpersonal relationships and individual practices in restrooms. Cahill used ideologies of Emile Durkheim, Erving Goffman, Margaret Atwood, Horace Miner, and Lyn Lofland to help construct his perspective on the individual’s expectations of bathroom etiquette through our experiences with others and how we internalize these behaviors.
Marriage could take two close friends far away from each other, but the emotional intimacy continued to be strong, as demonstrated in letters sent to one-another. This was not considered strange, as the gender roles enforced on the men and women included restrictions on intimacy between young heterosexual couples. Men and women were segregated to the point that the lack of the opposite sex within their social circle stunted the emotional intimacy and spontaneity of romantic relationships. A woman 's close friend was a consistent source of emotional intimacy within a relationship, which strengthened the relationship between the two
Personal space, body language, and overall interaction between the participants in the gym was something that I hadn't paid enough attention to in the past, from the distance I could see that their interests. The intimate couples that I noticed in the gym seemed again sought to have created a private space for them by erecting invisible barriers through their private body language directed only at each other, resulting in considerable more space between these couples and other groups of people in the gym. It was a clear and present body language of please do not bother us attitude left a sense of diffused power that would be involved power relationships that operate without covert commands and requests. The dynamics of the couple was something that was very obvious, in that I was able to note the dominant and the submissive person. The person who had a tendency to meet the needs and the one who had the ability to be demanding.
...ercentage of people so long as we have enough "chance encounters" to fill these roles. It does present other problems, however, especially in places with high population density. These situations are so random and diverse that they're nearly impenetrable to ins. It'd probably be very beneficial to randomly talk to people we sat next to on the subway. We could learn about each other and make valuable business or personal contacts with no danger or downside. Regardless, would we even consider doing such a thing? Even if we did, neither the initiator or receiver of the interaction would feel special or consider it could become a real friendship. I could've selected anyone to chat with and you could've been selected by anyone. Interacting with others without an in may only be a faux pas because if it works too often, our dream of a friend-aligning force would be dashed.
Social Penetration Theory uses self disclosure as the starting block that allows couples to form and then become more intimate. They become more committed as the depth (degree of intimacy) and breadth (number of areas) of their communication increases (Regan, 2008). Couples who share many intimate details of their history, life and personality are closer and are able to become stronger units. Couples also participate in a cost/ reward system where actions and gifts are exchanged to keep worth and balance in the relationship. Intimacy Theory further expands on that by including the quality of the communication and the feelings associated with it also makes couple closer. Couples that feel validated, understood, cared for, accepted and nurtured promote the intimacy growth (p 43).
Personal space has many factors that affect how different people react such as their culture, gender, race, age, etc. (The Development of Personal Space in Primary School Children - Springer 195). Personal space is when someone feels uncomfortable in his or her own space or bubble (Personal Space 1). People call their space a bubble so when someone gets to close it might pop (Wells 1). One-person controls how big or small the bubble is (Wells 1). There are four areas that break down space (Igarashi, Stade, and Vriens 4). Internal, mental, physical, and spiritual are the four boundaries that de...
In most cases the boundaries enlarge either through conflicts, invasion, grabbing or even stealing. New boundaries are thus formed through either expansion or reduction of the already existing ones. The minute the boundaries change, the society is automatically confronted with new challenges related to this adjustment. Charles Tilly a social scientist, is convinced that, a lot of related problems regarding the social boundaries shifts arise and become complicated when one really needs to understand their origin and their functions. For instance, when the urge of explaining their origin, motives and the impact they have on the community arises. Secondly, attempting to figure out what manner was used during their formation. Thirdly, transformation processes involved and finally their performative roles and functions when confronted with particular situations. The happenings of these circumstances may occur at a particular time and in a particular place. Boundary incidents may be a result of violent provocation or they can be suppressed to prevent them from
Chapter 7 says, “every person has a complex relational network or web or relationships that connects individuals to one another (HCOM Book, pg. 182).” “A family is a small social group bound by ties of blood, civil contract, and a commitment to care for and be responsible for one another, often in a shared household (HCOM Book, pg 182).” Our first relationships we are introduced to are with family. From there we learn how to communicate with others outside of our family, to create friendships. The book defines friendship as, “a close and caring relationship between two people that is perceived as mutually
Cox, F.& Demmitt, K. (2014) Human Intimacy: Marriage, the family and its meaning (11th ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Cengage Learning.