More handpicked essays just for you.
Review of literature about performance appraisal
Review of literature about performance appraisal
Key functions of a performance management system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Review of literature about performance appraisal
Performance appraisal is a process of analyzing and recording information of an employee’s performance pertaining to his or her present, and to make the employee realize how their performance has been during the rating period. It can be used as a communicating tool performance expectation to employees. I chose this topic to describe the importance of Appraising Performance in employee’s career development, managers, and to the company. Another reason is to explain the benefits of having a performance appraisal system and how this system can have a significant impact in the company. The primary reason for having a performance appraisal program is to evaluate the employees’ performance, improve the company’s morale and motivate the employees. It helps the company to identify its strength and training needs. In addition to monitoring employee’s performance, it is important that the employees understand their expected role and their functions in the company.
One of the most important benefits of having a performance appraisal system in the company is the opportunity to enhance th...
each other, the extremes between them are quite distinct and range from individually tailored to a
At its most fundamental core, quality improvement of healthcare services and resources requires disciplined attention to the measurement, monitoring, and reporting of system performance (Drake, Harris, Watson, & Pohlner, 2011; Jones, 2010; Kennedy, Caselli, & Berry, 2011). Research points to performance measurement as a significant factor in enabling strategic planning processes and achievement of performance goals (Tapinos, Dyson & Meadows, 2005). Thus, without a system of measurement that accounts for the performance behaviors of healthcare professionals, managers and administrative employees, quality improvement remains a visionary abstraction (de Waal, 2004).
The director has a few different roles in the evaluation. One role deals with the center itself evaluating whether or not the program has following its mission and meeting all its goal. From the information gathered they need to figure out what is or isn’t need to improve the program itself. The other role is what they do when dealing with staff evaluations. During staff evaluations, a direction role is to observe and analyze the work of the staff in question. They also need to find ways to encourage that development in that staff member’s strength while working on promoting growth in their weaker areas. If the staff member’s weakness greatly outweighs their strengths, then the director will have to fire them. When doing the evaluation, the director makes sure to inform the staff member that an emulation is being done and what the method of evaluation will be.
DiClemente (2013) stated, “Although no evaluation is perfect, evaluation research can have a high degree of rigor” (DiClemente, Salazar, & Crosby, 2013, pp. 298). The result of a high degree of rigor can lead to the utilization by program planners and policy experts which would in turn could impact public health policy and promotion practice (DiClemente et al., 2013). This is obtained by a step by step, all equally important, process in what is known as the “Nine Step Stairway to Effective Evaluation”.
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
Assessing the environment is the second part of step four in the strategic planning process. The organizational internal assessment is important in identifying the strengths and weaknesses of Brendel Elementary School. By providing an organizational assessment, the planning team can clarify the aspects that help in accomplish the mission and fulfill the mandates in the organization. This part of step four enriches the management information system (MIS) with more qualitative data in order to make MIS more effective. Moreover, the organizational assessment clarifies the organization’s competencies, distinctive competencies, and core competencies. (Bryson 2011, 166)
Based on your view of the objectives of performance evaluation, evaluate the perspectives about performance appraisal presented by the managers.
There is an array of key components and factors involved in making an organization a successful business. One of those elements consists on evaluating employee’s performance; this sole component is critical in determining how effective is the organization’s productivity and which are the necessary steps to ensure proper functioning. “The performance appraisal may be one of the few times during the year where an employee and the reviewer, typically the employee's supervisor, can sit down and have a lengthy face-to-face discussion about all aspects of the job” (Joseph, 2016). Employees’ performance assessment serves as an instrument to gather important information as to which areas of the job description are being performed according to standards
A terrible tragedy occurred on March 25, 1911. There was a devastating fire at the Asch Building. It took 146 lives of the 500 workers that reported for work that day. In fact, it was such a devastating disaster that up to that time, it was considered the worst workplace disaster. Who’s fault was it? Why did the fire occur? Many ask these questions, but none can be sure.
Section 1: The focus of many managers is most often on the wrong things. They focus on appraisal rather than planning. Performance appraisal is not performance management. Managers often focus on a one-way flow of words (manager to employee) rather than dialogue. Performance management and the end of the year appraisal are often seen as a necessary evil. They don’t realize that if carried out properly, performance management has the potential to fix many of the problems they’re facing.
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
The manager communicates with the members of staff individually on a regular basis providing all the necessary information about the employee’s overall performance as it relates to their roles in the workplace. This performance appraisal is beneficial to employees as it allows them to create an outline for their goals with the greatest effort it should not be used to lower the employee’s level of motivation but seek to increase it.
Organization is a group of people brought to gather to achieve specific goals. Goals can be achieved if team member are performing well. Performance is the results of activities given to the employees in an organization to be achieved within specific period of time. Evaluating the current performance of employees against past performances and organizational standards is known as Performance Appraisal (Dessler, 2005). Furthermore performance appraisal helps the company know how individual employees are performing and how to improve their performance thus improving the performance of the company (Grubb, 2007). A performance appraisal is propose in which the performance management system in an organizations set work goals, determine performance standards, provide performance feedback, determine training and development needs and distribute rewards as well as evaluating an employee’s job performance during a period of time. The performance of team member is much more than appraising individuals’ works, it is managing the business, so the performance of an employee is influences by the performance of an organization. It is target to achieve the best results for the planned strategic by managing activities of employees. There are many different opinions on the performance appraisals, some organizations do performance appraisals without any aim just follow others., where some organizations do performance appraisals to make sure they have a record of a piece of paper in the employee’s file – they are careless about do corrective action. But successful organizations understand the importance of combining performance appraisals into their performance management process and strategy plan as the success of any organizatio...
Although performance is a major objective at top organizations, successfully addressing poor performance is also a key focus. Although many employees feel or dread performance appraisals they are directed to enforce clarity with individual employees day-to-day work-load, performance appraisals develops responsibility while making employees accountable for performance expectations, reinforces future career planning, helps the organization with determining training needs, and provides a stem of documentation for legality purposes. Performance management in detail is much broader than many employers, and employees assume and necessitates so much more. Proficient appraisals should represent a summary of on-going dialogue. Focusing only on an annual performance evaluation leads to misrepresentation of the performance management process in its
...ement systems which combines both financial and non-financial measures which are considered more appropriate with the growing market. For instance, the two well-known performance measurements used by wide range of companies: Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Performance Prism.