Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Painting analysis of edward hopper
Edward hopper art analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Painting analysis of edward hopper
Who knew a painting by Edward Hopper could have so much of a meaning behind it. So much thought put into such beautiful, elegant artwork. In this essay, I am going to analyze the painting People in the Sun. This simple piece of artwork has a complex story behind it. The contrast, lighting, and the people all emphasize his piece of artwork. Each person has a different reaction to the scenery set by Edward. Edward tries to portray what the world is like through this group of five people. The painted scenery represents our lives and the opportunities we have every day. Can you look at a painting and get the meaning instantly? Looking at any painting is a challenge, but I was able to look through the painting and find the real meaning. Edward Hopper did a wonderful job with this piece of artwork. The meaning behind it was genuine, it was a perfect connection to today’s world.
The painting was set in an extravagant scenery. A group of five people surrounded by mountains, hills, blue skies, the
…show more content…
sunshine, and the perfect weather. Each and every person had a different expression on their face. Every person’s facial expression and reaction to the view in front of them set the mood of the painting. Every face makes the mood, quiet, peaceful, concentrated, but yet mysterious mood. The people in the painting are so hushed and motionless, which sets the mood. Each person’s facial expression is a mystery to the viewer. Edward Hopper wanted the viewer to really look deep into the painting. He wants you, the viewer, to think beyond the paintbrush strokes and realize which person you would be. It is very interesting because everyone sees the same scenery, but seems to be in their own world. This group of people seems too careless of what is actually in front of them. The people in this painting all have one thing in common and that is how they are dressed. They all seem to be dressed in business attire or clothes that are too fancy to be sitting outside in the sun. The lady in the red scarf is sitting straight up, she seems uptight and apprehensive. The man reading is concerned with what is in his hands, the book. He seems anxious but disturbed. One man is laid back in the chair he looks slightly relaxed but still careless. The man with the mustache looks more drawn to the scenery than any of the others. He looks very sophisticated. Lastly, the hidden woman, who is a mystery to the viewer. It is hard to say something about her. Edward Hopper painted this woman and hid her face for a reason. Edward made the group of five people different. Edward wanted to connect the people in the painting with people in today’s world. Now to focus on what is not seen, which is the meaning. Edward Hoppers painting People in the Sun, I think tries to tie his piece of artwork with human feelings. Edward uses a sense of landscape and scenery to represent things with today’s world. Each person’s reaction to the scenery and beautiful landscape has a powerful meaning. He painted each individual person distinctly for a reason. I think Edward’s meaning of this painting is to show what the world is like today. Many people do not realize what it is in front of them. They are always doing “better things” or caught up in the world. The world is a beautiful creation created by God, so many people overlook it just like the people in the painting. Today the world is not appreciated enough. Edward Hopper is trying to reach out to his viewers and get them to understand that you could be one of the people in the painting. Each person viewed the scenery differently. The lady in the scarf, she seemed so uptight and apprehensive. The lady looked like she was too good to notice the scenery. It was almost as if she had a negative attitude towards the scenery. This shows the viewer that this was a type of lady that does not appreciate what is in front of her. The man reading was interesting to me. The man was reading a book he looked distressed, but focused on not the scenery, but whatever he was reading in his hands. The viewer should pick up that this a type of person in today’s world that are too busy to take time away from their busy schedule to notice the world and opportunities in front of them. The main laid back in the chair shows the viewer the type of people who are careless. These type of people may enjoy the world, but they could care less about it. The man with the mustache looks like the only one to actually the take time to look at what is in front of him. He seems to be concerned, unlike any of the others. The man actually appreciates the view. This shows the viewer that there are types of people like the man with the mustache in today’s world. Lastly, the hidden woman is a mystery to not only me, but I think every viewer. Edward’s idea of hiding the woman’s face makes the viewer think deeper about the piece of artwork. To me I think the hidden lady is there for you, the viewer, to get an idea if that was you sitting there looking at the scenery. It does make the viewer think which type of person you would be. Would you be the apprehensive, negative lady in the red scarf, the man too busy for the world, the careless man or even the man who actually takes his time to look at the view in front of him? Today’s world is so messed up.
People are just too careless these days. In Edward’s painting, I feel as if he is trying to describe the ignorant people in today’s world. People in the Sun is a painting that connects with many people. Most people have the “I do not care” attitude, just like people in the painting. There are not many people in the world like the man who actually seemed to appreciate the view in front of him. It is sad what the world has become and it will only continue to get worse. Edward Hopper did a great job trying to connect with his viewers.
People in the Sun is a piece of artwork that is challenging but has a great meaning behind it. Edward Hopper connected the painting with the messed up world we live in. It does make the viewer think which person they actually are. It is a mystery to figure out the people in the painting and to figure out which person you are. The question Edward Hopper would want to know is, which person in the painting are
you?
Wayne, transforms this painting into a three dimensional abstract piece of art. The focal point of the painting are the figures that look like letters and numbers that are in the front of the piece of art. This is where your eyes expend more time, also sometimes forgiving the background. The way the artist is trying to present this piece is showing happiness, excitement, and dreams. Happiness because he transmits with the bright colours. After probably 15 minutes on front of the painting I can feel that the artist tries to show his happiness, but in serene calm. The excitement that he presents with the letters, numbers and figures is a signal that he feels anxious about what the future is going to bring. Also in the way that the colors in the background are present he is showing that no matter how dark our day can be always will be light to
As Hirsch intended, the painting is meant to teach a lesson in judgement and retribution. Hirsch’s painting showed the how we as human are susceptible to greed and it is something we need to overcome or we will be judged and punished.
A consistent imagery in “Notes” that has a political implication is the sun. Universally, the sun represents warmth and the energy that gives life; however in this poem, the sun represents Mao Zedong. According to McDougall, the sun was commonly used to “signify Mao Zedon...
As members of a first-world nation, we are disrespectfully quick to point out the flaws and downfalls of impecunious societies and use the societies like mere scenery, even though we walk together on this earth. In “Sun and Shadow," Ray Bradbury manipulates Ricardo to convey to the reader the impertinence from outsiders and the responses from Ricardo and his fellow townspeople. A photographer is encountered doing a photo shoot on Ricardo’s property, and Ricardo becomes unhappy with his presence and angrily tells him to leave. After Ricardo’s increasingly sharp comments and attitudes augment, the photographer becomes satirical and facetious, poking fun at the lifestyle in which Ricardo lives. The short-tempered townsman reveals his defiance through actions projected towards the photographer. Through the use of characterization, Bradbury defines the fine societal line between Ricardo, the penurious dweller of the village, the inconsiderate photographer, and the sympathetic townspeople.
A old sandy color bridge is cast upon the middle of the painting, which is crumbling apart and crashing into the water. The water in this painting is dark blue and white showing the choppiness of the water. In the middle of the painting is a white statue with its head broken off, but still standing, holding a black shield leaning forward towards the center of the painting. In the background fire and gray and black smoke cover the landscape. The gray skies linger over the town with a dark depressing tone. While the river banks are roaring with fire. In the lower center of the painting is a woman dressed in white jumping to off the river bank with a warrior behind her. In the lower portion of the painting ships are on fire. Throughout the whole painting you will see thousands of people, some enemy warriors some townspeople. The enemy warriors are wearing red. While the townspeople are dressed in typical daily life clothing
Though people can look into color and composition, others can still even look into the source of the art itself. Cole goes deeper, delving into the source of the art, looking in particular into the idea of cultural appropriation and the view a person can give others. Though it is good for people to be exposed to different opinions of a group or an object, sometimes people can find it difficult to tell the difference between the reality and the art itself. Sometimes art can be so powerful that its message stays and impacts its audience to the point where the viewer’s image of the subject of the art changes entirely. Cole brings up an important question about art, however. Art has become some kind of media for spreading awareness and even wisdom at times, but in reality, “there is also the question of what the photograph is for, what role it plays within the economic circulation of images” (973). Cole might even be implying that Nussbaum’s advertisement can sometimes be the point of some media, and that sometimes the different genres of art can just be to make someone with a particular interest happy. One more point that Cole makes is that “[a]rt is always difficult, but it is especially difficult when it comes to telling other people’s stories.” (974) Truthfully, awareness and other like-concepts are difficult to keep going when a person or a group is not directly involved.
..., the broader feel of the scene. He wants us to take in the entirety of the painting but have a moment to catch the individual scenes within it, like the couple dancing, the man in the corner rolling his cigar, or the women in the front talking to the man. We do get places where our eyes can rest, but in general your eye takes in the swirl of modern life and pleasure.
This is an interpretation I simply cannot accept, for I have always regarded the sun as symbolic of the superego - the force of society within Meursault.
Along the far left bank you see a single brick red chimney with a low roof as light wafts of smoke drift toward the left. In the bottom right corner, we see a bit of the bank the perspective is from and bits of grass are also leaning to the left, so one is given the picture of a nice day with at least slight breeze. Towards the center of the painting, you can see large boulders, smoothed, rising out of the river. Far into the distance, past the bank of the river, onto a higher level of the valley area, you see small gathers specks and shapes that represents a small mountain village.
When first approaching this work, one feels immediately attracted to its sense of wonder and awe. The bright colors used in the sun draws a viewer in, but the astonishment, fascination, and emotion depicted in the expression on the young woman keeps them intrigued in the painting. It reaches out to those who have worked hard in their life and who look forward to a better future. Even a small event such as a song of a lark gives them hope that there will be a better tomorrow, a thought that can be seen though the countenance by this girl. Although just a collection of oils on a canvas, she is someone who reaches out to people and inspires them to appreciate the small things that, even if only for a short moment, can make the road ahead seem brighter.
Painted by Vincent Van Gogh during a final burst of activity in Auvers before his suicide in July, Houses at Auvers features many of the characteristic elements typical of Van Gogh; the experimentation with color, texture, and thick brush strokes. This painting depicts the view and landscape in early summer, highlighting the patchwork of houses and the rolling greenery. Van Gogh’s unique, thick brush strokes lead the eyes through the painting, create texture and patterns and also highlight and shadow objects in the early summer sun, while his experimentation with color creates contrast and a bright, vibrant image.
The Passing of the Eclipse just kind of jumped out at me. The darkness in this painting has an ongoing effect to it making the composition open in the picture. There are closed lines that outline the telephone post and trees. Also, I see soft and blurry lines in the reflection of the telephone poles and trees. The painting is more realistic because you can make clearly make out objects such as trees, poles, darkness and eclipses do happen. The tone in this picture is cool in color and very dark. The sun has a dark square inside of it reflecting the eclipse that is happening. Although the square is not as big as the sun it still appears to be night. The sun itself is more of a warm tone with orange-yellow tones. The sun also appears to have rays of light coming from it. The rays of light almost create a stable square shape.
The sunset is the death of the day and the birth of the, reveled for their initial beauty, and soon feared for the darkness that ensues. These ostensibly opposite situations appear when the Gladney family find themselves unsure of how to react to the beautifully terminal sunset: “Certainly there is awe, it is all awe, it transcends previous categories of awe, but we don't know whether we are watching in wonder or dread, we don't know what we are watching or what it means, we don't know whether it is permanent, a level of experience to which we will gradually adjust, into which our uncertainty will eventually be absorbed, or just some atmospheric weirdness, soon to pass” (DeLillo, 308). Death exists as this a foreign yet familiar concept you go throughout your entire life knowing the inevitability of. It inspires you to live your life to the fullest while concurrently indicating that eventually none of it will matter. There is no correct way to endure or confront it. The only way to truly come to respect death is by forming a crowd, a shield, to ward off irrelevant extrapolation. The sunset scene demonstrates the validation of death through crowds. Jack and his family realize that only by being together, the mysterious concept no longer has control over them. By validating the existence, you
Uniquely, Camus' usage of the sun opposes its warmth and beauty in The Stranger. The sun is a symbol for feelings and emotions, which Monsieur Meursault cannot deal with. There is a sun motif present throughout the novel, which perniciously characterizes the usual fondness towards the sun. The sun is a distraction from Meursault's everyday life and he cannot handle it.
The painting was of a river flowing from a lake, surrounded by very tall grass. On each side of the river there are people standing. What was interesting is they were painted all black. They looked like shaded figures. They were all shaped differently but you can tell they were all men. On the top left side of the river there were five men. On the right bottom side of the river there were four men. On each side it looked as though the men were trying to cross over to the other side. They looked tired and scared. It looked as though they were hiding, and getting across the river was the only way to get to that safe haven.