Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of technology in teaching
The effects of technology in teaching
Role of technology in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of technology in teaching
Teaching is a practical professional knowledge that requires specific competence and expertise in designing and delivering instruction. Shulman (1986) first introduced the concept of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) that entails understanding how to teach subject matter to students, claiming that teachers needed such knowledge to have professional expertise. With the growing influx of various learning technologies into the classroom, teachers increasingly need to wisely integrate technology into their instruction. Mishra and Koehler (2006) thus expanded the idea of PCK to include this attention to technology with the framework of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), claiming that teachers need to develop fluency in each of …show more content…
In response to the increased interest in teachers’ professional competencies, teacher educators and educational researchers have paid particular attention to the issues on how to help pre-and in-service teachers have such an integrated body of knowledge and, by extension, how to ensure whether teachers are armed with to such competencies from the training and/or programs. In particular, evaluating teacher competencies and the quality of teaching have been paid greater attention to all of education communities coupled with the current accountability policies and initiatives. Many teacher education programs, organization, and teacher education researchers have developed evaluation models and systems to measure the teacher knowledge and skills (e.g., National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, National Education Association). Yet, they are by and large based on the individualistic approach to assessment practice, meaning that the central focus of assessment is on the extent to which an individual …show more content…
This study specifically focuses on affordances of games as an assessment tool to measure such situative nature of knowledge. Several studies have already pointed out affordances of games as a good assessment tool (e.g., Chin, Dukes, & Gamson, 2009; Loh, 2008; Shute & Ke, 2012, etc.). Particularly, many learning scientists have pointed to the fact that games are good learning environments as well as assessment tools based on the sociocultural theory and situated cognition perspective (Shaffer & Gee, 2012; Schwartz, D.L., & Arena, D.A, 2013, Young et al., 2012). Drawing on such theoretical foundation, this study will elucidate the underlying mechanism of how games can be used as an assessment tool for measuring interactive and situative body of teachers’ competency with
I can help my teachers be professional learners by using observation and evaluation processes, like those found in Danielson’s model, to promote self-assessment, reflection on practices, and professional conversations with them. The Framework can help me have honest, reflective conversations with the teachers about their instruction and I can use it as a guide to help all involved in professional development decisions. In other words, I can use such teacher evaluation models to promote active engagement and encourage professional growth in all
Charlotte Danielson, an internationally recognized expert in the area of teacher effectiveness, created The Framework for Teaching, which is comprised of four domains of teaching responsibility (Danielson, 1996). Danielson specializes in the design of teacher evaluation to ensure teacher quality and to promote professional learning. Danielson’s framework is based on large amounts of research, including the Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) project, supported by the Gates Foundation (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 2013). Danielson’s framework also aligns with the Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC), which outlines what a beginner teacher should possess in skills. In addition, it is the underlying set of ideas
National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2007). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from: http://www.ncate.org
The Federal definition of a “highly qualified teacher” requires the teacher to have certification for the State, having passed licensing exams. An elementary school teacher who is new to the field is required to have a minimum of a bachelor’s degree, has passed State testing, subject knowledge and skills in reading, writing mathematics and other areas of basic elementary school curriculum. A middle or secondary school teacher who is new to the field has the same requirements; however they must also demonstrate high levels of competency in each of the academic subjects they intend to teach. Academic standards have been established for each state. The idea is to prepare students for college and “the real world”. This also creates an accountability system that recognizes student growth and school progress (ESEA Reauthorization, 2010).
Core knowledge is a psychological theory that proposes the idea that children have innate cognitive abilities that are the product of evolutionary mechanisms, called nativism. The theoretical approach of constructivism also includes that children have domain-specific learning mechanisms that efficiently collect additional information for those specific domains. The core knowledge theory is primarily focused on whether our cognitive abilities, or capacities, are palpable early on in development, or if these capacities come up during a later developmental phase (Siegler 168).
A competency specifically teaching competency is determined as the level of integration of skills, wisdom, and behaviors. It is servered as a standard on how teaching should be performed within a particular measure of passable level. However, often studies about teachers' competency are being extremely examined today. Since, imposing student learning to identify how efficient the instruction among student targets depend on how competent a teacher is. In addition, possessing this kind of standards for teachers prepared higher quality performance of right classroom assessment. Ergo, awareness of deliberating students' advancement and teahers enhancement of their teaching can be developed. (Magno, 2013; Stoof, Martens, & Van Merrienboer,
There comes a time in person’s life when their must make decisions that will further go on to impact their life vastly. For many, that decision is whether to further their education or not. For those who do decide to further their education, they must choose which type of schooling is best, college or vocational schooling. Vocational schooling may appeal to those who are looking for an alternative and less expensive form of education. College, the more standard form of education, gives students the ability to have more flexibility since a variety of careers can be open to them from the major they choose. Both forms of education have its advantages and disadvantages, while benefiting the future of the student in the long run.
To effectively teach place value (PV), teachers must understand why it is important and how children best learn about it. This requires teachers to have pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of PV to effectively teach and assess children on their mathematical content knowledge (MCK) of PV. Educators must be knowledgeable of the stages that PV needs to develop, and the important things children need to understand about PV. Teachers must be familiar with the typical experiences needed to help children learn PV concepts, how specific ideas about PV develop from earlier ideas and how they underpin what children learn later. Teachers should use common resources, manipulatives, and equipment to help children develop a conceptual understanding
Professional development is critical to success in a teacher’s career. Teachers need to be opened to continuing their education and consistently reflecting on lessons and interactions with students. At the expert stage of teaching, “the teacher’s practice is characterized by fluency, automaticity, and efficiency” (Garmston,1998). In order to achieve this level of teaching practice, the educator must continue to learn new teaching strategies, understand the curriculum, recognize students and their differences, and conduct self-reflections. A teacher who is dedicated to professional development and wanting to improve their teaching, will make a stronger impact on students. I believe that I am in the Proficient level of performance according to the Framework for Professional Teaching Practices (Danielson, 1996).
Everyone knows that when it comes to making a difference in a child’s academic and life achievements, their teachers play a large role. A teacher’s ability to relate to their students, and teach them to achieve both socially and academically contributes to how effective they are. What does it mean to be an effective teacher? Overall there seems to be an emphasis on teacher effectiveness related to how well their students are performing on standardized testing. As teachers we know there is more to being an effective teacher then just teaching our students based on tests. This paper will identify different definitions of an effective teacher along with how to assess teachers on being effective.
“Educational technology for educators includes any media that can be used in instruction,” (Lever-Duffy & McDonald, 2008). These individuals view educational technology as items like; audio, video, and digital media items. Educators that are more computer-oriented see educational technology as computers and related software used for teac...
The teacher was rated using a rubric with specific criteria in four domains including planning and preparation, the classroom environment, instruction, and professional responsibilities (Hillsborough County Public Schools, 2012). Within each of these domains are components which are the performance factors that are relevant to classroom teachers. In domain one the components include: demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy, demonstrating knowledge of students, setting instructional outcomes, demonstrating knowledge of resources and technology, designing coherent instruction, and designing student assessments. The components for domain two include: creating an environment of respect and rapport, establishing a culture for learning, managing classroom procedures, managing student behavior, organizing physical space. In domain three the components included are: communicating with students, using questioning and discussion, engaging students in learning, using assessment in instruction, and demonstrating flexibility and responsiveness. There is only one component that was rated for domain four which is reflecting on teaching.
The state’s new evaluation system was in response to administrators who produced, “superficial and capricious teacher evaluation systems that often don't even directly address the quality of instruction, much less measure students' learning” (Toch, 2008). Too often, the “good-ol-boy” attitude would insure mediocre educators would remain employed. Realizing this was often more the rule then the exception, the governor created educational mandates to focus, “on supporting and training effective teachers to drive student achievement” (Marzano Center, 2013). Initially, they expected the school districts and the teachers would have issues and experience growing pains, but in the end the goal was, “to improve teacher performance, year by year, with a corresponding rise in student achievement” (Marzano Center, 2013).
The introduction of technology into education has revolutionized the teaching quality and learning outcome in the last ten years. The integration of technology into lectures by teachers in classroom has become so natural that both teachers and learners consider computers and their related applications for instruction are “a routine component of the classroom and educational processes in general” (Nuldén, 1999 cited in Buzzard et al., 2011, pp.131-139).
For teachers to be effective in ways that increase students’ academic achievement, teachers must have the competency needed to teach in their respective content areas. For the purposes of this paper, teacher effectiveness and competency will be discussed in terms of a teacher’s ability to improve student’s academic achievement. Teacher competency is associated with the teacher’s readiness to teach their subject. According to the National Research Council (NRC), an estimated 10-20% of math and